Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347) +---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 |
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 15-05-2015 11:35 It's a good job you don't write books, Rammy, your entire bibliography could easily be summarised in one short paragraph within the foreword of your first book. Everything else is just tinder of astronomical proportions. Thank fuck it's deletable and the rain forests can sleep at night. RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 15-05-2015 11:41 (14-05-2015 23:47 )Scottishbloke Wrote: So just to confirm one thing Rammy, you love all the babes on that channel equally brushing all technical issues to one side Such as dictionary definitions of the word naked . Or is the dictionary only full of opinions based on interpretation of definition rather than fact? The Louise Porter Naked v The Dictionary Naked. Clearly needs to be referred for an independent adjudication . The adjudication will need to take place at night so that the adjudicator can accurately assess the state of nudity or not on each of the channels. In doing so the adjudicator will be ensuring he/she has a good solid night and can suitably refresh him/herself with a cold shower afterwards . I'll get my coat making sure I don't trip up on the surrounding tubs of paint . RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 15-05-2015 12:33 Perhaps we should call it 'naked in all the right places', to appease the pedants RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - DB83 - 15-05-2015 13:04 The channel needs to think again about their background music. They repeat two songs but one of these has a near expletive. Did not think that was allowed whatever the time of day. RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 15-05-2015 14:20 Kerry Louise has joined Storm so they have Kerry Louise and Stevie Louise RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 15-05-2015 14:37 Is this the start of the Exodus I predicted ? RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 15-05-2015 15:07 (15-05-2015 12:33 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Perhaps we should call it 'naked in all the right places', to appease the pedants Only if we can have another adjudicator to determine where 'all the right places' are . Oh no but wait that would be a matter of opinion and not fact . RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 15-05-2015 16:51 (15-05-2015 08:58 )Broncobilly Wrote: It sounds to me like your here to say everything is great. Problem is that it's not all great. Being objective is important credit the good bits and point out the bad/mistakes. I've never said sintv don't make mistakes and everything is great. I know sintv has its problems, including a lack of organisation behind the scenes, problems with the phone lines and the xstreams. Hope these are all sorted out soon. As for Kerry-Louise leaving to join storm being the start of an exodus from sintv, too early to say I think, mainly because she isn't the 1st night babe over the years to join a channel, only then to leave soon after, I remember Savannah Mai doing 1 night on s66 having joined from bs, only to then go back to bs. Think it was the exactly same with tori-lee, she joined s66 from bs, did 1 night on s66 and then went back to bs. Have to see if anyone else leaves sintv over the next few weeks and how many babes leave. If quite a few leave, then yes can probably say it's an exodus, especially if no babes are joining sintv. But sintv do have a few babes joining next month though according to ree petra, that's not including karina currie, holly mcguire and paige turnah. RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 15-05-2015 17:16 (15-05-2015 16:51 )Rammyrascal Wrote: I've never said sintv don't make mistakes and everything is great. I know sintv has its problems, including a lack of organisation behind the scenes, problems with the phone lines and the xstreams. Hope these are all sorted out soon. I think you know exactly what answer we were looking for and all this technical talk wasn't that, nice try mind you but your get out of jail free card has expired I think RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - nilford - 15-05-2015 17:36 Why have people got Rammy pegged as Sin's apologist? He's just a viewer like anyone else; he's not answerable. |