Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mikeboob - 13-10-2012 14:32 (11-10-2012 17:28 )elroyticklestab Wrote: Somewhere in Ofcom there is a Harriet Harman wannabee who sees the 900 channels as disgusting. Last night's shows were pathetically tame so it is obviously the producers who are running scared of Ofcom as many of the models do hardcore, open leg or at least tasteful nude. I suggested something similar a few years ago http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=24756 now things are even milder and nothing changes on any front. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 14-10-2012 02:03 Ofcom have got all this what is harm and offence the wrong way round. When I was a kid I'd have many a nightmare which is very common at that age. I will list you a few examples here. Back in 1985 I went to the cinema to see Return To Oz, the follow up to the Wizard Of Oz and much darker than anybody had anticipated at the time. Certain scenes stick out to me, the men on the wheels chasing Dorthy and the wicked Queen who had a variation of different heads in a cabinet. That's just a few of the scenes that scared the living shit out of me, believe it or not this movie was made by Walt Disney. Also I remember seeing various similar type programmes, some were even on childrens telly. Not once did the sight of a naked body on the telly however give me nightmares. I should know because Channel 4 was showing some quite racy stuff during the 80's and 90's. So my argument basically says that if a child were to accidently get up in the middle of the night and stumble across the 900 channels just what kind of harm would it do. I'd imagine stumbling across the Horror channel would likely have an effect on a child whereas naked flesh just wouldn't. Ofcom need to get their research and facts straight. It's a no brainer just what is offensive to a minor and what isn't and nudity just isn't one of them. RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 14-10-2012 22:28 (14-10-2012 02:03 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Ofcom have got all this what is harm and offence the wrong way round. When I was a kid I'd have many a nightmare which is very common at that age. I will list you a few examples here. Same here the bad things i hated on tv from childhood was Jaws when Jaws bit into the person on the boat and blood come out of his mouth made me feel ill..Alien when the thing come out of his stomach and Salems Lot scared me to bits..I remember twice seeing a baby being born properly on tv, not pixellated crap on One Born Every Minute and disliked the blood but not the vagina...Ofcon are anti-vagina with no valid reason for this,,not one valid reason at all.. RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 15-10-2012 20:59 So what's the endgame for Ofcom? Does Ed Richards want the complete annihilation of the babe channels? Or does he want to tame them down so much that they'll collapse because of lack of content and the viewing public will get fedup watching and don't bother to call up? Well i dare say other more knowledgeable forum members will shed more light on this, however in my opinion if Ofcom really wanted to close the babe channels they would have done this long ago. Now apart from the so called complaints about storm it's been pretty much quiet on the western front. Now i might be wrong, however i really think Ofcom have realistically pushed the channels as far as they can regarding content. I think if the channels get any tamer we might as well be watching cartoons I would be interested to see what you guys think? My Main question is what's the endgame from Ofcom? that's the $64000 question i would like to no? whether anyone of us really knows the answer is open for debate RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 15-10-2012 21:20 Does anybody know when Ed Richards takes his holidays, would be interesting to see if it is him that is spouting all this bullshit about the 900's being offensive to children, well offensive or not they are quite clearly labelled as Adult Chanels although to go along the same lines as Continental, maybe they should just stick them in the 600's next to all the childrens channels. Afterall as ED and the gang put it, they must not cause any offence to the children. If we are using children as a pond to play then Babestation and co should now be placed next to CBBC and The Disney Channel. What a choice now The Flintstones followed by some Babestation and then rounding up the nights entertainment with some Blue Peter directly after watching feel or no feel on Televison X. Maybe Richards should do another research and send out a survey around all the primary schools asking the kids if they reckon Lucy Summers should get a boob job or not. I mean as he appears to think that they watch the channels then I'm sure any feedback Miss Summers get from a large part of the viewing audience is vital in order to keep all the customers happy RE: Ofcom Discussion - Shady - 15-10-2012 21:49 (15-10-2012 21:20 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Afterall as ED and the gang put it, they must not cause any offence to the children. If we are using children as a pond to play then Babestation and co should now be placed next to CBBC and The Disney Channel. Maybe this is why Alex Salmond is courting school children as prospective voters in 2014. Vote for me kids and I'll give you tea time porn It might explain why Ed's being such a knob! RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 22-10-2012 11:58 Ofcom's latest broadcast bulletin came out today, issue number 216 and dated 22/10/2012 . No babe channels were mentioned as being found "in breach" or "not in breach" , so i presume the investigation launched into Studio 66 mentioned in their last bulletin is still ongoing . Ofcom broadcast bulletin mentions that they received complaints about three babe channels , Ofcom received a complaint about sexual material shown on STD 66 on the 25/09/2012 , Ofcom assessed the complaint but decided not to investigate further. Ofcom also received a complaint about RLC 4 for something shown/done on the 12/09/2012 , Ofcom also decided not to investigate this complaint further . Ofcom received a complaint about something done/shown on Storm nights on the 29/9/2012, but this time Ofcom have decided to launch a investigation into this complaint . RE: Ofcom Discussion - jonnyalpha - 22-10-2012 16:00 (15-10-2012 21:20 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Does anybody know when Ed Richards takes his holidays, would be interesting to see if it is him that is spouting all this bullshit about the 900's being offensive to children, well offensive or not they are quite clearly labelled as Adult Chanels although to go along the same lines as Continental, maybe they should just stick them in the 600's next to all the childrens channels. Good points and a well put forward argument but pls pls no suggestion that the awesome Lucy Summer should get a breast job not even joking pls she is perfection personified not having a go SB as I do agree with your OFFCOM views but pls not Lucy changing that awsome body. RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 22-10-2012 16:30 Well you'll have a laugh at this I emailed Ofcom a few months back about there ridicules stance on the Adult channels. When I mentioned about the 9pm watershed there response to me was that they don't believe children don't go straight to bed at that time!! In otherwords they are saying that the watershed really means nothing to them at all? I also mentioned about the farce concerning the classification of the adult channels being classed under the umbrella as shopping channels. The answer they gave me was not convincing at all to say the least. You talk about double standards, when the clock strikes 9pm a woman can bare all for a medical programme, yet when it's for sexual pleasure the 9pm watershed doesn't mean the same thing!! What a load of Bollocks!! It's one rule for one programme and one rule for another it's a bloody joke!! These guys couldn't regulate bath water let alone programmes RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 23-10-2012 00:04 (22-10-2012 16:30 )continental19 Wrote: Well you'll have a laugh at this I emailed Ofcom a few months back about there ridicules stance on the Adult channels. When I mentioned about the 9pm watershed there response to me was that they don't believe children don't go straight to bed at that time!! In otherwords they are saying that the watershed really means nothing to them at all? I also mentioned about the farce concerning the classification of the adult channels being classed under the umbrella as shopping channels. The answer they gave me was not convincing at all to say the least. Yes you can see a vagina lips open wide at 8pm Embarrasing illness thing yet you can never,ever see this any other time after watershed ever,ever,ever..SEXIST ,HYPROCRITAL AND ,WELL ,,,,SEXIST. |