+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17445)
^Urgh, DEFINITELY not. She has a terrible attitude - the thinnest skin this side of Cali Garcia - and was prone to snapping on here, repeatedly. Fewer divas needed on these channels. How about instead of bringing back x,y, & z, 66STD's actually try finding fresh talent?
(14-11-2017 14:38 )Robot Devil Wrote: ^Urgh, DEFINITELY not. She has a terrible attitude - the thinnest skin this side of Cali Garcia - and was prone to snapping on here, repeatedly. Fewer divas needed on these channels. How about instead of bringing back x,y, & z, 66STD's actually try finding fresh talent?
(14-11-2017 14:38 )Robot Devil Wrote: ^Urgh, DEFINITELY not. She has a terrible attitude - the thinnest skin this side of Cali Garcia - and was prone to snapping on here, repeatedly. Fewer divas needed on these channels. How about instead of bringing back x,y, & z, 66STD's actually try finding fresh talent?
^ Absolutely... Look at what almost always happens when a big name returns to the shows - they slot right into the staid, minimal poses, minimal movement, way of working. The vibe is essentially: 'Happy for another pay day'.
Then consider the feeling that the best hungry newcomer, such as Nicole Snow say, can bring to the shows.
If you want change on the babeshows it'll require a change in the predominant attitude. Outside of regulation relaxation, virtually the only viable way I can see that happening is via a large influx of new talent with strong enough minds to pursue their own course within the operators' strictures. Imagine if 15 or 20 started with Nicole's ethic. A commercially successful, strength in numbers, group is something the old guard haven't yet had to face or have not yet allowed. They convert any ones and twos that stick to their way double quick.
(14-11-2017 14:38 )Robot Devil Wrote: ^Urgh, DEFINITELY not. She has a terrible attitude - the thinnest skin this side of Cali Garcia - and was prone to snapping on here, repeatedly. Fewer divas needed on these channels. How about instead of bringing back x,y, & z, 66STD's actually try finding fresh talent?
I don't know why such lovely looking women would have such horrible attitudes.
(14-11-2017 14:38 )Robot Devil Wrote: ^Urgh, DEFINITELY not. She has a terrible attitude - the thinnest skin this side of Cali Garcia - and was prone to snapping on here, repeatedly. Fewer divas needed on these channels. How about instead of bringing back x,y, & z, 66STD's actually try finding fresh talent?
I don't know why such lovely looking women would have such horrible attitudes.
Because they get away with it because they are pretty. If they were ugly people wouldn't kiss their asses and massage their egos. An ugly girl would be told to pull her shit together!!
About time S66 we get to see a new girl on nights Chanel Valentino who IMO looks amazing with very little one just need a couple more to get rid of the OLD guard