RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 18-08-2017 10:13
Everyone will probably disagree with me, but if it's a case of ultra tamed POVs where we see nothing, or less tame ones where areas are briefly blurred, I'll take briefly blurred any day of the week. Then again, I'd rather brief glimpses fully shown
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-08-2017 10:17
^ People will probably disagree with me, but, POVs are better these days if they are not nude.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-08-2017 10:32
Another 'development' of 'new' MTB seems to be babes going private, as winsaw pointed out the other day - at least, I assume that's the explanation, given the regular, quite frequent 'here one minute, gone the next' that's now happening - if so, then the 'babe on two channels simultaneously' is not just 'break covering'.
BTW, do they still offer a listen in option for this channel?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 18-08-2017 11:55
^^^^ Strangely enough those caps seem to be of the same image quality as a lot of the pervecams! More subliminal advertising?! 
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 18-08-2017 13:00
^ So, roving POV cam (which is of noticeably poorer quality than the main cam), plus 'Blurovison' = pervcam 'quality'?
Perhaps that's the benchmark they were aiming for with their premium priced product? Yep, that sounds like Lamestation 'logic' to me. 
(or, it could just be my caps to blame! )
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 18-08-2017 14:01
so what have we learned about the new MTB this week, other than its shit 
it seams that if there are no "new" girls in like last night then its just used like the other 2 channels just with the girl disappearing from time to time when she is took off into private,
we have also learned that a girl is decided to be "new" by the producer on the night so some girls like Maisie who only have a few shows under there belt get to do normal shows on all 3 channels (thank god) but other girls like Scarlett with 10 months and lots of night shows are now "new"
so there is now way of knowing which girls are now going to be required to keep there outfit on and show nothing,
all this is turning MTB into a total bodge job of a channel thats very unwatchable some nights,
it will be interesting to see how many calls Mia gets on the 21st when she dose her next non-nightshow on MTB will people still call now they now there is no payoff to that call, will she get so much private action to get the amount of money she makes upto what a girl doing a normal nightshow on the other channel will, i dont think so
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - trains55 - 18-08-2017 14:34
^
Yes it seems like a BS bodge job! I used to enjoy MTB when it was on FV BUT I'm ALMOST glad that it's not on! As you say it's so variable without consistency! It also seems to be on FV from 3.00 despite what the EPG says!
Next Monday will/could be "interesting" as we have Mia Middleton and Jasmine Marie on (both "new" girls) who haven't gone topless plus ONLY Sophie Hart and Olivia Berzinc! So unless BS add extra girls? they will have to go on the "MAIN" channels and show more! Or will they??......................
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 18-08-2017 18:41
Is "new" this guy's (or BS's) euphemism for 'girl of the night with lowest average stats to date'?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 18-08-2017 23:12
There's a weird effect on Lynda's microphone, every time she speaks her voice vibrates like someone is repeatedly slapping her on the back (you know the wawawawa sort of noise)
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - marlowe - 18-08-2017 23:12
(18-08-2017 14:01 )winsaw Wrote: so what have we learned about the new MTB this week, other than its shit 
If you liked Olivia you'd agree that MTB was the best channel on Thursday night.
|