+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 01-11-2012 09:47
(01-11-2012 09:17 )shankey! Wrote: i dunno about anyone else but it has enraged me reading this, bloody shocking
It is, whilst it also shows the desperate levels channels will go to in order to try and hurt one of their rivals. Such a desperate situation, 'cause instead of being part of the solution the babe channels are clearly nothing more than a major part of the problem, and happily continue on the same path.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 01-11-2012 09:59
not shocking for me, most of the babechannel complaints come from other babechannels. if they stopped complaining about each other and combined forces, they could probably get the rules changed for the better
bangbabes though brought about their own demise constantly ignore ofcom warnings etc so wasnt a surprise that they got their licences revoked
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 01-11-2012 11:43
Well it's shocked me , yes it's been generally assumed that some complaints come from rival channels, but i always thought it was just a channel boss or employee pretending to be a outraged member of the public and making a occasion complaints, i never imagined a fellow babe channel operator would go to such lengths or sink so low as to have your staff record numerous hours and over several weeks the Bangbabes shows in order to provide Ofcom with evidence of wrongdoings, this low life channel even offered to send DVD's they had recorded to Ofcom by courier of Bangbabes breaking the rules, did this Ofcom nark channel by Licking Ofcom's ass think they would get in Ofcom's good books by turning informer ? .
I don't know which channel it is that went to these lengths to provide Ofcom with this evidence but i wonder if Bangbabes did know, i don't think any of the channels can be ruled out as the super grass, but i tend to rule out SEL , SEL were in the shit themselves around that time and couldn't provide Ofcom with recordings of their own channels, so i can't see SEL telling Ofcom we can't record our own channels but have recorded Bangbabes instead . RLC/Playboy can be ruled out as well because RLC used to be part owned by Bangbabes and Banbabes used to lease a channel from Playboy , so what channel is the super grass rat that helped cause the demise of Bangbabes ? .
Talking about Bangbabes breaking the rules, most of the channels were also breaking some rules at that time, probably not quite so blatant has Bangbabes but they were still doing it, with pussy flashes and see through knickers being worn by some girls , but maybe this low life Ofcom ass lick channel wasn't sending the recordings of other channels to Ofcom so they fell under Ofcom's radar .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 01-11-2012 16:35
It should be easy to deduce which channel it is if the business's post code (or that of their stooges) is detailed in the complaint. I couldn't read much of the complaint list as I was getting too angry!
Chilly flagged up a post yesterday from a channel owner (posted last year) and suggested he was the one. I agree, in fact I'd put money on it.
The use of language is the same in the post as in the complaint to Ofcom. Furthermore, it's known that there was no love lost between BangBabes and the person in question. This person also used to run BangBabes.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 01-11-2012 22:00
The 2 month delay is really odd. What triggered the complainant to write in after 2 months? Were they holding it in reserve?
It was almost at the limit for retention of recordings.
(01-11-2012 07:11 )oklahoma001 Wrote: ... 3 Business complaints reported all on the same day, March 11(nearly 2 months passed since the first offense) within a 2 hour timespan. If they didn't feel compelled to report the channel the following day, or even within the same week, then really how offended were they?
Quote:11/03/2010 12:09
Bang Babes, Tease Me 3 (Channel 959) 16 January 2010Quote:11/03/2010 12:23
Bang Babes, Tease Me (Channel 912) 17 January 2010, 00:38Quote:11/03/2010 14:17
The Pad, Tease Me 3 (Channel 959) 27 February 2010, 12:00
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 02-11-2012 21:05
Now i dare say someone far knowledgeable will no but i have a few questions that i would like to ask.
1. If the main tv broadcasters want to do away with the 9pm watershed, does anyone have an idea how long this would take to implement?
2.How many countries still have a watershed? or is the UK one of the last remaining countries with a watershed?
Thanks guys
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 03-11-2012 03:30
(02-11-2012 21:05 )continental19 Wrote: 1. If the main tv broadcasters want to do away with the 9pm watershed, does anyone have an idea how long this would take to implement?
If it was down to Ofcom it would take them 3-6 months to discuss the matter internally, draft a consultation and get it signed off by the Ofcom board, plus any time for discreet cosultations with main broadcasters. They would also have to coordinate with the advertising bodies and possibly ICTIS (premium rate phone regulator). They would then publish a consultation - I think they typically allow 3 months for replies. Depending on the number of responses they could take a further 3 months to digest the response. If the consultation went their way they would then publish their findings and new rules typically take immediate effect.
Say 6-9 months.
If instead Parliament decided to legislate, no idea but at a guess the DCMS would have to draft a law, it would usually be announced as an aspiration for the next session of Parliament, then would have to go through debates in both houses. Watch out of career sharks tabling amendments to please the gutter press. Laws dont usually take immediate effect, it is considered polite to give several months warning. Ofcom would then need to update the Broadcasting Code, but might be able to shortcut the procedure. Say 1 year minumum.
Dont know about the watershed in other countries, but I suspect most have controls on free to air channels until the evening. (Except the French who have a slightly different attitude to nudity, as well as pissing in the street). Might be different for encrypted channels.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 03-11-2012 03:33
Things take way too much time in general
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 03-11-2012 03:34
(02-11-2012 21:05 )continental19 Wrote: Now i dare say someone far knowledgeable will no but i have a few questions that i would like to ask.
1. If the main tv broadcasters want to do away with the 9pm watershed, does anyone have an idea how long this would take to implement?
2.How many countries still have a watershed? or is the UK one of the last remaining countries with a watershed?
Thanks guys
This link gives all the watersheds,,i knew about Americas safe harbour through twitter discussions with other folk pissed off to high heaven with oftwats sexism.If it was not for talking to like minded folk i would be in prison now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watershed_(television)
PS i have had a skim through but Italy bans 18 + vids altogether.
edit,,also found from The Independent which hope will get rid of this VAGINA TABOO for good,
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/men-women/why-have-vaginas--which-were-once-worshipped--become-taboo-8092761.html
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 03-11-2012 12:35
Many thanks to Eccles mrmann and fedup for replying to my questions, thankyou all