(16-05-2015 00:05 )Mellie D Wrote:  Speculate to your hearts content.

(16-05-2015 00:53 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  The clock is ticking Rammy because of the lack of calls and therefore the lack of income for SIN TV

(15-05-2015 23:38 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  

(15-05-2015 23:28 )DB83 Wrote:  ^^ Tried to keep it simple if Rammy does not do economics

It is pretty obvious to most that currently costs exceed income. That will be the case with most start up companies. The critical thing here is how big the channel's working capital is (I am also a retired accountant) and how long they have budgeted for these losses. In accountancy-speak there is an important document called a cash-flow forecast which predicts when income will at the very least cover costs so that working captital is not decimated. I prepared many of these in my time and I always told the client to err on the side of caution and not expect income to be optimal for some time. If you have followed 'The Apprentice' you will see how the business plans of these budding entrepreneurs are regularily savaged by the experts because the sums do not add up. Still waiting for someone to propose setting up a babe-channel

Sorry DB83 I did not realise you were also a retired accountant. Perhaps we should join forces to visit SIN TV to give them such badly needed financial and commercial advice on how to run a new company. We may even be able to sign up some of the babes as our accountancy clients !!!!!

(15-05-2015 23:35 )Mellie D Wrote:  MDTV - it even has a ring to it. Seriously though, I do hope they sort themselves out. I always flick through the channels out of curiosity and it's all cringeworthy. Not just Sin but all the channels. I so miss the days when it was fun to be a babe channel babe and when the callers/viewers were happy campers. It's still possible to make it happen, but no one is even trying anymore. Again, that's why I was so excited to have a channel that could put the others to shame without the hefty fines. It is possible to put on a horny show without breaking the rules. I managed to produce top shows at RLC and I never got an OFCOM complaint as a producer. Girls used to argue when the rota got changed and I wasn't their producer anymore, because they knew they would do well with me. I am competitive whichever side of the camera I am on and I always like to come up trumps. There is NO excuse for poor production and NO reason to have bored girls. There is certainly no reason for Paige to be advertised as Louise on the streams. Seriously, WTF? It's just a case of ticking a box lol

(16-05-2015 04:18 )babelover48 Wrote:  

(15-05-2015 23:38 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:  

(15-05-2015 23:28 )DB83 Wrote:  ^^ Tried to keep it simple if Rammy does not do economics

It is pretty obvious to most that currently costs exceed income. That will be the case with most start up companies. The critical thing here is how big the channel's working capital is (I am also a retired accountant) and how long they have budgeted for these losses. In accountancy-speak there is an important document called a cash-flow forecast which predicts when income will at the very least cover costs so that working captital is not decimated. I prepared many of these in my time and I always told the client to err on the side of caution and not expect income to be optimal for some time. If you have followed 'The Apprentice' you will see how the business plans of these budding entrepreneurs are regularily savaged by the experts because the sums do not add up. Still waiting for someone to propose setting up a babe-channel

Sorry DB83 I did not realise you were also a retired accountant. Perhaps we should join forces to visit SIN TV to give them such badly needed financial and commercial advice on how to run a new company. We may even be able to sign up some of the babes as our accountancy clients !!!!!

Whoever gave them the cash to start up the channel is surely sometime going to pull the plug. If they are incurring losses it is their own but they should have made sure that there was enough to cover any losses to keep the plan going. But atm I can only see one very big plug hole opening up for sin TV

(16-05-2015 04:01 )Joey 27 Wrote:  lets be honest Sin TV would be bringing in more calls if all of us on here phoned the babes including myself, the question is do the casual viewers who call the Sin TV babes on the sky channel care enough about Sin TV to bother looking for the X streams?

(16-05-2015 06:41 )Bandwagon Wrote:  

(16-05-2015 04:01 )Joey 27 Wrote:  lets be honest Sin TV would be bringing in more calls if all of us on here phoned the babes including myself, the question is do the casual viewers who call the Sin TV babes on the sky channel care enough about Sin TV to bother looking for the X streams?

I think it's fair to assume that most people these days are internet savvy and will realise there is a website to visit.
So once Joe Bloggs does find the website it would be helpful if the streams were actually working or had a schedule to attract custom. I'm still at a disbelief that this hasn't been implemented yet.How many people have turned away thinking that the streams just don't work at all or can't be arsed to wait?
They should have called this show 'Lottery Girls TV' because there's no apparent organisation to anything that happens. I would imagine people just get fed up and fuck it off (I know I do )

I do sometimes pick up the phone but never to Sin TV, why? Because their selection of girls doesn't suit my needs since I like natural busty girls like Tammy Taylor and Kandi Kay etc. If I'm spending money then I'm either pissed, or the show is blowing me away.
The girl needs to spark that initial interest though else it ain't happening.