+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - HenryF - 03-11-2012 23:34
(03-11-2012 03:30 )eccles Wrote:(02-11-2012 21:05 )continental19 Wrote: 1. If the main tv broadcasters want to do away with the 9pm watershed, does anyone have an idea how long this would take to implement?
If it was down to Ofcom it would take them 3-6 months to discuss the matter internally, draft a consultation and get it signed off by the Ofcom board, plus any time for discreet cosultations with main broadcasters. They would also have to coordinate with the advertising bodies and possibly ICTIS (premium rate phone regulator). They would then publish a consultation - I think they typically allow 3 months for replies. Depending on the number of responses they could take a further 3 months to digest the response. If the consultation went their way they would then publish their findings and new rules typically take immediate effect.
Say 6-9 months.
If instead Parliament decided to legislate, no idea but at a guess the DCMS would have to draft a law, it would usually be announced as an aspiration for the next session of Parliament, then would have to go through debates in both houses. Watch out of career sharks tabling amendments to please the gutter press. Laws dont usually take immediate effect, it is considered polite to give several months warning. Ofcom would then need to update the Broadcasting Code, but might be able to shortcut the procedure. Say 1 year minumum.
Dont know about the watershed in other countries, but I suspect most have controls on free to air channels until the evening. (Except the French who have a slightly different attitude to nudity, as well as pissing in the street). Might be different for encrypted channels.
Nail, head. Nice post, bud.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 04-11-2012 17:07
I no we've touched on this before, however I was thinking why don't they do the same like Babestation x, and have a secure pin where you have to give your e mail address and your credit card details exactly what Babestation uses?
I mean If there was a 241 all action leg spread full frontal action on redlight TV for example, I'd pay a fiver depending who'd be on of course?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 04-11-2012 17:48
(04-11-2012 17:07 )continental19 Wrote: ...
why don't they do the same like Babestation x, and have a secure pin where you have to give your e mail address and your credit card details exactly what Babestation uses?
...
It cost money to run an encrypted feed like that. A lot of the existing girls won't go 'all out' on such shows (read the complaints on the BSX threads) which means employing other girls to provide the content to keep people subscribing to recoup the costs etc
Logistically it becomes a big investment, and I guess the other channels simply don't feel it's an investment worth making.
Bear in mind as well that the BSX encrypted channel only runs on freeview. I think the discussion around the time it was launched was that to run such a channel on Sky would require paying a hefty premium to Sky for the encrypted feed, which would make the whole thing economically unviable.
Why pay a hefty cost for an encrypted tv feed which is still subject to broadcasting restrictions, when you can run an anything goes webcam show on the website for a whole lot less?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 05-11-2012 16:09
Ofcom's latest bulletin came out today issue number 217 and dated 05/11/2012 only one babe channel gets a mention as far as i can see , Ofcom have decided to launch a new investigation into a complaint made about Studio 66 for something that occurred on the night show on 10/10/2012 on Studio 66 4 , Ofcom don't mention what it is about .
There aren't any complaints made against any other babe channel as far as i can see, there doesn't even seem to be any complaints made that Ofcom think are not worth investigating either.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 05-11-2012 17:21
Pretty sure I know which moment this complaint is referring to.
Likely a rival producer, babe or non fan who is doing this, as usual.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 05-11-2012 18:17
(05-11-2012 17:21 )mrmann Wrote: Pretty sure I know which moment this complaint is referring to.
Likely a rival producer, babe or non fan who is doing this, as usual.
i cant recall seeing anything on studio/elite that would have given reason for complaint in a long time how cautious they are
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 05-11-2012 18:41
yeah agree shankey, studio66/elite have been cautious for quite a while now. every since ofcom started strictly enforcing the rules the babeshows elite/studio66 have toned the shows down to comply with the new rules. i think they did that from when the babeshows got reclassified
i expect like with most complaints studio66 have been getting, it will either be thrown out with no further action, or s66 will get a slap on the wrist
good news that the babeshows arent really getting any complaints at the moment
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 05-11-2012 19:32
The reason there are fewer complaints is the lack of adult content in any of these shows simple as that.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-11-2012 20:10
I'd personally like to complain to ofcom about the tame shows, they are failing to meet my expectations. Also since when did watching very attractive women on the telly putting on a sexy show become a crime. I must have been taking a shit when that was decided
Tonight is Guy Fawkes tonight, I wonder if in the future we'll have our own bonfire night and call it ED Richards night
Both he and ofcom could be thrown into the fire because in the future when we reflect on the babe channels past and present Ofcom will be a name that will forever be infamous and the ones who almost destroyed the babe channels so long as they are still here by which hopefully we will have such threads such as which babe has the best pussy lips
I might just make up a banner in the meantime with ofcom on it and throw it into the fire as a statement of my disgust towards these fascists.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 05-11-2012 20:15
(05-11-2012 19:32 )jimmyt73 Wrote: The reason there are fewer complaints is the lack of adult content in any of these shows simple as that.
Definitely.
It's like living under Orwell's 1984 scenario.
People snitching on each other to gain favour with the authorities.
(Present company excepted, of course).