+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312)
+------ Forum: Charlie O'Neal (/forumdisplay.php?fid=286)
+------ Thread: Charlie O'Neal - Babestation: Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=12306)
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - Moorey - 22-03-2010 13:24
We can have our opinions one way or the other, and obviously we are all entitled to them. But at the end of the day it is the choice of said person (I'm not accusing anybody, but people can forget that these models are people too!) whether they have their boobs enhanced or not.
This seems to be a constant topic over most, if not all, of the naturally breasted women on these shows. Sure we can all get passionate (for want of a better word) about it either way, but the topic of boobjobs is getting kind of stale in my opinion.
I usually stay pretty quiet on these forums, but I've been around a bit and seen a lot of these types of discussions. Either way, Charlie and all of the other girls will hopefully do what they feel is right by them in the end. Boobjob or no boobjob, I'll still be a fan of Charlie O.
Hope people don't see this post as trying to stifle the general posts that are going on, that truly wasn't my intention. Just wanted to give my 2 cents on the boobjob discussions as a whole.
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - PersonaNonGrata - 22-03-2010 14:38
(22-03-2010 13:24 )Moorey Wrote: We can have our opinions one way or the other, and obviously we are all entitled to them. But at the end of the day it is the choice of said person (I'm not accusing anybody, but people can forget that these models are people too!) whether they have their boobs enhanced or not.
This seems to be a constant topic over most, if not all, of the naturally breasted women on these shows. Sure we can all get passionate (for want of a better word) about it either way, but the topic of boobjobs is getting kind of stale in my opinion.
I usually stay pretty quiet on these forums, but I've been around a bit and seen a lot of these types of discussions. Either way, Charlie and all of the other girls will hopefully do what they feel is right by them in the end. Boobjob or no boobjob, I'll still be a fan of Charlie O.
Hope people don't see this post as trying to stifle the general posts that are going on, that truly wasn't my intention. Just wanted to give my 2 cents on the boobjob discussions as a whole.
Yes, all very reasonable and well thought out, but bad things happen while others waste time debating and trying to appear rational and reasonable.
No, I'm afraid I'm not with you on this. I think it's best to be blunt - Charlie, DON'T do it, bad idea!
RE: Charlie O'Neal - mrmann - 22-03-2010 15:10
DO NOT GET A BOOB JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can't understand why a PERFECT young woman with PERFECT breasts would want to cheapen her look. I could understand it if she had no breasts, or was a bit flat chested, but her breasts are the PERFECT size. Boob jobs have gone way out of style these days, and I for one have never liked them, unless they are used in moderation for flat chested women, which Charlie is not.
I think she will actually lose a bit of viewers if she does this. Her sweet untouched look is what sells, not having fake breasts and looking like most of the women from Bang Babes
Camilla is still hot though!!!
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - Moorey - 22-03-2010 15:12
Eh, I didn't put all that much thought into it!
Well, I respect your opinion, one that seems to be shared among quite a few people. The point I was mainly trying to make is that boobjob or no boobjob, she'll always be a favourite of mine.
I feel like I'm repeating myself also, from the Camilla thread when she eventually got hers done. Pretty sure I said something similar there too!
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - PersonaNonGrata - 22-03-2010 22:31
Perhaps if we replace the phrase "cosmetic surgery" with "mutilation", some people might finally get it!
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - Moorey - 22-03-2010 23:39
(22-03-2010 22:31 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Perhaps if we replace the phrase "cosmetic surgery" with "mutilation", some people might finally get it!
Was this directed at me?
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - PersonaNonGrata - 22-03-2010 23:52
(22-03-2010 23:39 )Moorey Wrote:(22-03-2010 22:31 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Perhaps if we replace the phrase "cosmetic surgery" with "mutilation", some people might finally get it!
Was this directed at me?
No mate, not you in particular - it was to enlighten anyone who thought boob-jobs were a good thing and "improved" a babe's appearance.
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - Moorey - 22-03-2010 23:56
(22-03-2010 23:52 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote:(22-03-2010 23:39 )Moorey Wrote:(22-03-2010 22:31 )PersonaNonGrata Wrote: Perhaps if we replace the phrase "cosmetic surgery" with "mutilation", some people might finally get it!
Was this directed at me?
No mate, not you in particular - it was to enlighten anyone who thought boob-jobs were a good thing and "improved" a babe's appearance.
Fair enough.
Given my 2 cents on the whole discussion now so I think I'ma bow out of this thread, that is until a non-boobjob discussion arises!
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - Dan Volatile - 23-03-2010 00:03
Just watching Ree and Lori on BS1.
Personally I wouldn't mind having a suckle on either.
RE: Charlie O'Neal - chat - vila - 23-03-2010 01:20
Given the amount (and nature) of discussion which has taken place on here subsequently, I would appreciate it if the moderator who deleted my reply to Josh187 would let me know what I did wrong.