+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: BABESTATION TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Thread: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61550)
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 06-09-2014 02:43
I actually think it's an excellent thing to do, it now opens the door rather than restricting the babes to just the one channel.
As opposed to Studio66 Babestation has proper choice, Studio66 earlier on had Delia broadcasting on 3 channels at the same time, not Babestation, it has enough babes to cover all 4 of them
Stick that in your pipe Studio66 and smoke it
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 06-09-2014 02:47
(06-09-2014 02:27 )Joey 27 Wrote: i think it's time to scrap the name starlets
Too late. I only watched the channel for 10 seconds tonight and still saw 3 references to "BS2" on the screen.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - trevor format - 06-09-2014 03:08
(06-09-2014 00:23 )mr mystery Wrote: So what's going on with Starlets ?
It's gone. Another channel experiment bites the dust. I'm surprised it was only given a month though.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 06-09-2014 03:13
No it hasn't gone Trevor, gone means the channel no longer exists on the EPG, it has been rebranded and not because it was a failure, the exact opposite, it never bit the dust, it was a success unlike Studio66 USA, that channel bit the dust
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 06-09-2014 03:21
(06-09-2014 03:08 )trevor format Wrote:(06-09-2014 00:23 )mr mystery Wrote: So what's going on with Starlets ?
It's gone. Another channel experiment bites the dust. I'm surprised it was only given a month though.
It was just a very silly piece of branding which clearly hadn't been thought through. A genuine starlets channel within the Cellcast stable could have worked, but this wasn't it.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 06-09-2014 03:30
(06-09-2014 03:08 )trevor format Wrote: I'm surprised it was only given a month though.
I'm a bit surprised it wasn't given longer too, but the call stats obviously told their own story.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 06-09-2014 03:37
(06-09-2014 03:21 )Digital Dave Wrote: It was just a very silly piece of branding which clearly hadn't been thought through. A genuine starlets channel within the Cellcast stable could have worked, but this wasn't it.
Well summed up and exactly right. Hit the nail on the head.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - trevor format - 06-09-2014 04:05
(06-09-2014 03:30 )BarrieBF Wrote: the call stats obviously told their own story.
I'm not disputing that the call stats must have been poor, but having started the channel I thought Babestation would have given it more time to establish itself.
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 06-09-2014 04:26
Another reason why they should have put it on freeview which only has 4 channels to wade through compared to skys 7,435 and it was right at the end of the sky daisy chain......
RE: Babestation Starlets - General Chat & Discussion - whizzer - 06-09-2014 04:57
Wow, I didn't see that coming. Axed so soon.
I thought the channel had potential.