+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 27-12-2014 11:53
i though it was a pretty good xmas on the shows, i really liked that we got to see some different girls,
props to RLC for bringing Lucy Kemp back for a one off show and for getting Mikayla to do a full night show again,
XF also had a really good xmas night with there 2 best girls in and getting naked and oiled up,
and lastly 66 had a good boxing night paticuly liked Jade getting naked
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 27-12-2014 12:10
I'm always grateful that the babes and behind the camera guys are prepared to work over the Christmas period.
So I say a big thanks to them.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 27-12-2014 13:44
(27-12-2014 09:26 )Davy Crockett Wrote:(26-12-2014 03:39 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: The tease hours on S66 are dressed up as some sort of "event"
In order to maximise revenue that's exactly how they should be promoted.
Exactly. As I said previously, this is precisely what they should be doing if they think they have got the tease/night balance right.
But that doesn't mean the truth of the situation shouldn't be acknowledged.
If people are complaining that whatever babe channel is 'poor' in some way, in their eyes, at the moment I don't think it's a waste of time look at why (beyond this or that bad performer or that "its all Ofcom's fault"). Looking at the likely reasons, it can, at least, then be seen if there is any chance of general improvement in the future!
Anyway, I don't think it's much of a stretch to say that the s66 tease hour thing is systematic of what is happening with some at the channels at the moment. Some involved in the industry are using the Ofcom situation as an excuse to reign in (to an extent that goes beyond what is required by the regulator) what was previously offered visually to the caller in a given timeslot. When the channel exec's do it, it can only really be to cut overall costs. (For instance, the use of daygirls in tease slots is surely cheaper than nightbabes; provided they can keep call rates the same the results are obvious.)
Now this may suit some who tune in. I'm not averse to tease shows myself, but they are more tricky to perform satisfactorily I think overall. So it is more problematic to get the right girl who knows what she's doing... As a channel, you are going to get more disappointed punters going down that route. At least until expectations are changed. But how much does that actually matter? Will it affect the channel's turnover adversely in the end?
To my mind, if anyone wants the channels back as they were ca.2010 that is what you have to hope for, along with Ofcom's fall/neutering. Why should a channel bother otherwise?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 27-12-2014 14:01
(27-12-2014 13:44 )ShandyHand Wrote: the use of daygirls in tease slots is surely cheaper than nightbabes
No way!
It costs a bomb to persuade day girls to do tease slots.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Goodfella3041 - 27-12-2014 14:45
^^^ I was weirdly just thinking that myself. It actually does surprise me that the babeshows are on at all on Christmas Day and New Years Eve.
It's like there is a list of "essential services" somewhere in a Whitehall department. Things that absolutely cannot be interrupted by the holidays.
Police
Fire department
National Defense
Babeshows
A&E
Airports
There is a screenplay in here somewhere. Something along the lines of The Day After Tomorrow or Deep Impact -- a proper disaster movie scenario. A nuclear bomb goes off in London. The best and the brightest gather in a bunker somewhere. And at some point, someone slams his fist on the table: "The babeshows must go on, damnit! Don't you get it!? There are guys out there - thousands of guys - trying to have a wank. We won't let them down!"
Too much?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 27-12-2014 15:09
Do you have evidence of that? I was thinking of the non-topless ones. I would have thought it was the nudity that costed more. But I bow to your superior knowledge if so.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - steviebaby - 27-12-2014 21:53
Quote:To my mind, if anyone wants the channels back as they were ca.2010 that is what you have to hope for, along with Ofcom's fall/neutering. Why should a channel bother otherwise?
The only way to get the shows back to the way they were or at least to some kind of level that pushes against OFCOMs straightjacket is for punters to stop phoning, simple as that.
Now I don't pretend to know how everyone's mind ticks, but personally speaking, I just can't fathom why anyone can get off spending a fortune talking to a fully clothed babe allegedly "teasing" or a bored-looking naked one making no real effort to be "sexy" or turn her caller on etc etc.
This is supposed to be "phone sex" after all!
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 27-12-2014 21:54
Several girls have said that they only did tease shows or night shows because they were offered a ridiculous amount of money to do do. Lucy Anne said it quite recently.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 27-12-2014 23:56
(27-12-2014 21:53 )steviebaby Wrote:Quote:To my mind, if anyone wants the channels back as they were ca.2010 that is what you have to hope for, along with Ofcom's fall/neutering. Why should a channel bother otherwise?
The only way to get the shows back to the way they were or at least to some kind of level that pushes against OFCOMs straightjacket is for punters to stop phoning, simple as that.
Now I don't pretend to know how everyone's mind ticks, but personally speaking, I just can't fathom why anyone can get off spending a fortune talking to a fully clothed babe allegedly "teasing" or a bored-looking naked one making no real effort to be "sexy" or turn her caller on etc etc.
This is supposed to be "phone sex" after all!
no, the only way the shows will get back to how they were in their heyday or close to their best is if Ofcom relax their rules for the babeshows, which I can't see happening. even if people (punters) stopped calling, it wouldn't change the rules the shows have to operate under
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Phonebook - 28-12-2014 00:28
Stop making excuses Rammy.