+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17445)
(09-09-2018 09:01 )Robot Devil Wrote: ...Just focus on the fucking TV product and forget that vanity project shite magazine. Stop wasting money taking various 'babes' abroad on fancy photo shoots. Just focus on your bread and butter products - the TV and website. It's not hard.
(09-09-2018 10:36 )ryuken Wrote: And the same thing is happening again with OnlyFans, where BS are playing catch up with BSFans and S66 are even further behind by trying to resurrect a clone of Playboy magazine in a digital era.
(09-09-2018 11:57 )Superhans95 Wrote: I'm purely speculating but I imagine the magazine (again who buys magazines in 2018) has taken up a lot of the creative decision making from the guys. The video section on the website hasn't been updated since July, nothing new added to the shows. But the magazine!!!! oh the magazine!!
Speaking of the magazine, what do they do with all the footage shot on these photo-shoots abroad?
Seems like a massive waste of time/prep/money for the end result to be what? 4 or 5 pics per girl or 1-2 minute vids on the site (some don't even feature any nudity, not even topless) or 10 second promos to post on twitter.
Would it not have been a better idea for them to start a subscription site with 10+ minute videos and picsets of 50-100+ pics?
(09-09-2018 15:09 )830ResAtDorsia Wrote: Speaking of the magazine, what do they do with all the footage shot on these photo-shoots abroad?
Seems like a massive waste of time/prep/money for the end result to be what? 4 or 5 pics per girl or 1-2 minute vids on the site (some don't even feature any nudity, not even topless) or 10 second promos to post on twitter.
Would it not have been a better idea for them to start a subscription site with 10+ minute videos and picsets of 50-100+ pics?
That makes perfect business sense, and it highlights how much potential income they've lost.
They could've easily made a profit by selling 10+ minute videos of Demi Rose Mawby, Bianca Gascoigne and Megan Barton-Hanson on an individual basis for the same price as the magazine itself.
Taking all those pictures and videos to then only make a 200 page magazine is highly negligent from a business perspective.
CASTING
STUDIO66 TV is known for having the best girls on our channels. We won't let our viewers settle for anything less.
Our casting team is always on the lookout for fresh talent to work in our London studios. You could be an established model/presenter or a completely new face.
Are you sexy, fun? Do you have the looks to be on TV? If you think you have what it takes to be one of the STUDIO66 TV Girls, then get in touch with your picture and a contact number at casting@studio66tv.com.
Please note that you must be over the age of 18 and able to work in London.
(08-09-2018 22:21 )interzone Wrote: Why does Caty insist on having the camera so far away? It looks like its in the next postcode tonight
Caty is self conscious about her height (so I've been told), so she has the camera above her, or below her. Although having it further away like she did last night doesn't help.
(09-09-2018 11:35 )Rake Wrote: S66 Days are in rude health, but nights are in need of life support.
Echo that sentiment, the day time shows are the best in the business in my view generally, but nights are, most of the time, pretty average to poor. Of course, there are exceptions, but for me mainly S66 for days, BS and Xpanded for nights