Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150) +--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 |
RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - babestation - 05-10-2011 10:23 (05-10-2011 09:41 )sceptic Wrote: so what your saying is new studio but: same old shitty (cut to bits) films, that no one wants to watch, and more repeats of live shows. Oh and i hope you keep the camera angle were by the viewer can't see what the girls are doing between the legs. Thus keeping up with 'liestations' standards. If no one wanted to watch them, no one would buy Xtreme and we'd stop broadcasting it, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc and the rest. You don't want to watch them. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - babestation - 05-10-2011 10:25 (04-10-2011 18:38 )m100 Wrote:(04-10-2011 09:22 )babestation Wrote: I can hear a lot of grinding and drilling coming from downstairs Haha yeah I didn't notice that until after I'd posted it. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - blackjaques - 05-10-2011 11:16 (05-10-2011 10:23 )babestation Wrote:(05-10-2011 09:41 )sceptic Wrote: so what your saying is new studio but: same old shitty (cut to bits) films, that no one wants to watch, and more repeats of live shows. Oh and i hope you keep the camera angle were by the viewer can't see what the girls are doing between the legs. Thus keeping up with 'liestations' standards. But, surely, those that DO want to watch them would watch more often if you told Ofcon where to shove their ridiculous rules? I know I would be prepared to spend if your product was full R18. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - babestation - 05-10-2011 15:07 (05-10-2011 11:16 )blackjaques Wrote: But, surely, those that DO want to watch them would watch more often if you told Ofcon where to shove their ridiculous rules? Maybe, maybe not. I don't think it matters what licensing laws we broadcast under; sometimes it's just good to not bring an extra attention on yourself. I'm not saying 100% that's the reason, it's mere speculation by me, but probably has something to do with it. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - blackjaques - 05-10-2011 19:24 (05-10-2011 15:07 )babestation Wrote: Maybe, maybe not. It's not good to" bring an extra atention" because we have an organisation like Ofcon creating a culture of fear amongst you, as broadcasters. FFS, this is the 21st century and our neigbours in Europe, including the country where you hold your licence, have been broadcasting proper adult entertainment for years, no fear of retribution or censure. It is pathetic and you, as a collective of broadcasters which includes TVX and the Playboy Group, are a bunch of pathetic fannies. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - JulianC - 05-10-2011 23:07 (05-10-2011 11:16 )blackjaques Wrote: I know I would be prepared to spend if your product was full R18. The question is, would you be prepared to spend enough for the station to pay the fines for infringing broadcasting regulations? RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 06-10-2011 10:14 (05-10-2011 23:07 )JulianC Wrote:(05-10-2011 11:16 )blackjaques Wrote: I know I would be prepared to spend if your product was full R18. They wouldn't get any fines from Ofcom mate , freeview Ch 96 is regulated by NICAM not Ofcom . NICAM stands for "Netherlands Institute for the Classification of Audio-visual Media" , it's not clear what BS if they choose to can actually show using this Dutch adult licence , but there's one thing for sure it's not regulated by Ofcom and Ofcom can't give BS any fines , Ofcom have said themselves that the BS channels with a Dutch licence are NOT regulated by them . RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - blackjaques - 06-10-2011 21:28 (06-10-2011 10:14 )mr mystery Wrote:(05-10-2011 23:07 )JulianC Wrote:(05-10-2011 11:16 )blackjaques Wrote: I know I would be prepared to spend if your product was full R18. Wherever they hold their licence, they still are abiding by Ofcon's "No Penetration Must be Seen" ruling. Ofcon still win. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - elgar1uk - 07-10-2011 14:26 I thought Freeview was owned by the BBC and ITV, so anyone showing R18 would surely be kicked of the air immediately, regardless of what any regulator thought about it or did about it. RE: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 07-10-2011 16:53 (07-10-2011 14:26 )elgar1uk Wrote: I thought Freeview was owned by the BBC and ITV, so anyone showing R18 would surely be kicked of the air immediately, regardless of what any regulator thought about it or did about it. To be honest i've never thought about it like that before , you could be right , whatever is or is not allowed by various regulators from different country's the owners of the tv networks such as Sky , freeview , Cable etc probably have a say as to what content is shown on their tv platforms , this could also answer the question that some people have asked as to why the feeview unencrypted babe channels seem to be at times tamer than the Sky only shows , maybe the owners of freeview don't want the content to be quite so explicit as the Sky owners ? . |