Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - elroyticklestab - 18-11-2012 09:36 Fining Chatgirl? Eh? Cbeebies and Disney will be at risk next. RE: Ofcom Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 18-11-2012 14:51 (16-11-2012 18:28 )Chilly Wrote: That's an insane amount of complaints. I know the channel is question happily provides daytime wank material for guys with a foot fetish, but surely that can't be it. Also, the channel is fairly shite, so what the fuck justifies that amount of complaints is just bizarre, even more so if it was missed by the forum. Missed by the forum, are you being serious Chilly. When did you last see anyone comment of anything risque being shown on any Babe channel. There is a definite paranoia among'st members when there may have been a glimpse of lady parts broadcast, the elephant in the room syndrome kicks in and everyone keeps schtum for fear of alerting big bad Ofcom, "do me a favour". And saying that did anyone notice Sophia Knight flashing her fanny in her see through knickers last night. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 18-11-2012 15:14 I still get updates regarding 'incidents' from some on here via PM, but the channel in question doesn't really get much attention this forum. So, the only people who know what happened are the rival channels. RE: Ofcom Discussion - HoneyRocks - 18-11-2012 18:22 (18-11-2012 09:36 )elroyticklestab Wrote: Fining Chatgirl? Eh? Cbeebies and Disney will be at risk next. Nah, that'll be the BBC's new adult TV channel 'CBoobies' lol! RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 18-11-2012 18:25 ^^^ Sometimes certain women are given leniency, from my point of view, and I think sometimes channels tend to ease up on the censorship here and there. Why mention this openly though if you feel it could attract Ofcom, or attract people who want to bring down certain channels? I hate to be that guy, but usually when something is mentioned, the shows become tame again for a bit. RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 18-11-2012 20:42 (18-11-2012 18:25 )mrmann Wrote: ^^^ Sometimes certain women are given leniency, from my point of view, and I think sometimes channels tend to ease up on the censorship here and there. Reading that gives the impression that the UK is run by the Stasi or KGB. Sex crimes? It's not surprising this culture of fear has emerged, though. Ofcon encourage it by welcoming quislings snitching on their colleagues. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 18-11-2012 21:04 (18-11-2012 20:42 )blackjaques Wrote:(18-11-2012 18:25 )mrmann Wrote: ^^^ Sometimes certain women are given leniency, from my point of view, and I think sometimes channels tend to ease up on the censorship here and there. True, but when I see Tweets from angry fans of women who've been unfriended, mentioning how they will complain to Ofcom about them, to get back at them, it does kind of make me wonder if they will use this forum to their advantage. I just don't see why it's so difficult to stick to PMs when mentioning slips, flashes etc, or to not post revealing caps, and only leave them in the videos. Is it so hard to say "Awesome night from so and so!!!", as oppose to "Great pussy flash from so and so! What a night!!!? RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 19-11-2012 03:12 (18-11-2012 15:14 )Chilly Wrote: I still get updates regarding 'incidents' from some on here via PM, but the channel in question doesn't really get much attention this forum. So, the only people who know what happened are the rival channels. True, but if Chatgirl can get in trouble so can the ones aimed at a more mature audience. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 20-11-2012 12:40 Ofcom's latest broadcast bulletin came out yesterday, issue number 218 and dated 19/11/2012 . Just had a quick look through to see if any babe channel get a mention and they do . Storm Nights has been found "in breach" concerning a incident that took place on the 29th of September 2012, someone alerted Ofcom that a girl was show on screen that could be heard shouting obscenity's, Ofcom requested Storm supply them with a audio recording of the incident, Storm failed to do this as they said they had got technical problem that night so couldn't supply the audio of the incident , so Ofcom found them in breach for failing to keep and supply audio recordings as required by law . Other babe channels that get a mention in the part that details complaints received but not thought to be worth investigating are:. Storm Nights for something done shown on the 25/09/2012 RLC 3 got a complaint for something done/shown on the 09/10/2012 Playboy TV Chat got a complaint for something done/shown on the 10/10/2012 Chat Girl got 3 separate complaints, a complaint for something done.shown on the 28/08/2012 and a separate complaint was made about a different incident on the same date , and another complaint was made about Storm on the 29/08/2012 I may have missed some as i have only had a quick look up to date . RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 20-11-2012 13:24 (20-11-2012 12:40 )mr mystery Wrote: Ofcom's latest broadcast bulletin came out today issue number 218 and dated 19/11/2012 . Ah, that old excuse. Easily the most lame excuse to Ofcom these channels consistently make. What's even more clear now is the simply fact that someone is going after ChatGirl TV big time, even if those three complaints didn't warrant being investigated. Yet we know there's still more to come for them. On one hand it's good to see complaints not being investigated, however, it's sad that even though the channels are seriously tame now, they're still being put under Ofcom's scrutiny. Really is a sorry state of affairs. |