Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - KerrAvon - 20-11-2012 14:02 The worst thing about Ofcom is they full well know these complaints are malicious rather than genuinely well motivated. Funny how complainers always happen to be on the 900 number channels at the precisely moment of incident. There should be change to the conditions for investigation, a minimum number of complaints such as 10 or 20. A single complainer out to get a channel would at least have to work harder. RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 20-11-2012 15:52 (20-11-2012 14:02 )KerrAvon Wrote: ... Thing is, it doesn't even need one complaint, some of the infringements are investigated following Ofcom's own monitoring, so having a minimum number of complaints is a no-go. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 21-11-2012 00:54 Ofcom do seem to have been lenient with Storm over the audio recording failure. They could have thrown the book at them. What is annoying is that adult channels are allowed no leeway when there is a minor visual breach of the rules. Every single time channels are found in breach, and often warned that a repeat could lead to a fine. Even if they admin the offence, put new procedures in place, send staff on training, sack people, even if they report themselves like Playboy did a while back. Other channels make similar noises and the case is marked "Resolved" meaning they are weally weally sowwy and it wont happen again, honest. Some channels make far more serious breaches, quoting religious rules about killing people, broadcasting blatant onesided material during elections or encouraging people not to take anti cancer medicine, and they get treated leniently. RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 21-11-2012 05:49 can you imagine it if ofcom were to rule the roost in the house of commons and fine mps for every "breach" they get up to ? the amount in fines would pay the nhs bill for a year,how they expect a live tv channel not to make mistakes is beyond reason ,being investigated for a reaction by one of the models swearing or a slip of a costume is a joke,especially when compared to other live tv shows , who practically get away with it on a daily basis RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 22-11-2012 14:03 Well, big-ED has missed out on the BBC job for a second time, so looks like we are stuck with him for a while longer : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20441887 RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 22-11-2012 14:19 (22-11-2012 14:03 )munch1917 Wrote: Well, big-ED has missed out on the BBC job for a second time, so looks like we are stuck with him for a while longer : One word that springs to mind " SHIT "!!! It might not be the most constructive post I've posted, but that sums up what I think about it RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 22-11-2012 15:30 Well once again the door had been slammed in our faces one again due to the fact that Ed Richards, didn't get the job at the BBC!! Just when we all thought there was light at the end of the tunnel only for the end of the tunnel to cave in So where does that leave us all? Well as far as I'm concerned 2012 is a year I want to forget in a hurry, after ofcoms interference, I'm just hoping that 2013 will be a more positive step in the right direction concerning our babe channels, when is Ofcom going to allow us the freedom to choose what we want to watch in our own homes, instead of acting like bloody dictators!! I just have this gut feeling that while the Dictator Ed Richards is sitting behind his desk over looking the Thames at Ofcom HQ nothing much is gonna change, however we must never give up hope we must all keep the faith RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 22-11-2012 17:08 (22-11-2012 15:30 )continental19 Wrote: Well once again the door had been slammed in our faces one again due to the fact that Ed Richards, didn't get the job at the BBC!! Just when we all thought there was light at the end of the tunnel only for the end of the tunnel to cave inhe must not want the ofcom job himself after applying and not getting two vacancies , lets hope something else pops up what floats his boat , he could always aplly at comet RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 22-11-2012 17:47 (22-11-2012 17:08 )shankey! Wrote: he must not want the ofcom job himself after applying and not getting two vacancies , lets hope something else pops up what floats his boat , he could always aplly at comet If he took over Comet he'd probably ban the sale of TVs because children might see naughty things on them. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 22-11-2012 17:52 First up my first reaction to ED not getting the BBC job is oh fuck, but I will look at the positives on this. ED has obviously got pissed off wielding the axe at ofcom and clearly no longer has the appetite for the job anymore and is wanting out. I wonder enough to turn a blind eye to perhaps a really good uncensored show. Christmas time and I also believe a lot of places are looking for extra staff. For example Tesco's and Asda's. On a more serious note surely his position at ofcom should be looked at, he clearly has no loyalty anymore. Maybe they should demote him to coffee boy. To answer continental's answer what 2013 brings is anybodys guess. Who knows the amount of money ED has anyway could prompt him to hand in his resignation, I mean he's hardly going to be at ofcom forever, he will be replaced if this organisation isn't scrapped before then. Another theory could be that ofcom are in their last days and all have been given notice, I mean with the UK under constant scrutiny from the rest of Europe scrapping this miserable censor might have already been decided for 2013. Let's not let this latest letdown defeat us or leave us feeling pessimistic. More twists and turns will surely follow in our fight for greater freedom. In a democracy anything is possible and hope is something that ofcom can never take away from us. |