+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 28-12-2014 17:39
(28-12-2014 15:49 )winsaw Wrote: i can see some are finding it hard to believe
Surprise surprise!
It's so far out and ridiculous that even the dimmest person would find it hard to believe.
Take Babestation as an example, since their accounts are published and their costs are known. Cellcast paid in the year 2013 a total of £1,148,189 in staff running costs, separate to £880,525 they paid for their 21 standing salaried staff and which included £296,000 paid to their directors. Now take the staff running costs and divide the total by 365 and you arrive at the average daily running cost for Babestation of £3,145. That's for 5 or 6 night girls, 3 day girls and 4 unleashed girls.
If even one established girl a day could earn £2,000 a shift as winsaw claims, that would leave about a dozen girls on around £100 a shift each. Surely winsaw can't seriously expect anyone to swallow that?
Pay to the girls did not go up that year either. The figures for the previous year show that 2013 saw less paid to the girls - a cost saving of 3.14% on what the girls received in 2012.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - hairbald - 28-12-2014 18:42
Admiral - stop ruining debate with proper financial analysis
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 28-12-2014 19:39
I remember an article in Esquire in 2013 stating that the girls earn on average between £4000 and £10000 a month which for girls who are on 3 or 4 times a week is less than £1000 a show.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Goodfella3041 - 28-12-2014 20:19
(28-12-2014 18:42 )hairbald Wrote: Admiral - stop ruining debate with proper financial analysis
Seriously. You are making the rest of us look bad.
And after I spent all afternoon working on my proof of what I called the Leigh Darby Theorem, which clearly demonstrates the folly of a girl earning >£200k per annum also moonlighting in hardcore porn for £1,500-a-scene.
Fortunately, you posted your analysis before I could send it off for peer review. That would have been awkwaaaaaaard...
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 29-12-2014 01:16
(28-12-2014 12:31 )winsaw Wrote: when 66 go hand held these days i tend to switch over as the camera moves around so much the picture becomes a blur, also why keep turning the camera sideways it just looks bad
I think the hand held camera is the best thing on the babe channels.
I agree about turning the camera sideways though - I don't like that and I don't know why anyone thinks it's a good idea.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - tony confederate - 29-12-2014 01:32
(29-12-2014 01:16 )bigglesworth Wrote: I agree about turning the camera sideways though - I don't like that and I don't know why anyone thinks it's a good idea.
I guess that someone at Studio 66 sees himself as the Federico Fellini of the babe channels.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 29-12-2014 01:43
^ Whoever he is, he's got to compete with the babestation camera operator who thinks that zooming very quickly in and out repeatedly is the height of dramatic erotic cinematography.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - elgar1uk - 29-12-2014 01:58
(27-12-2014 14:45 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: ^^^ I was weirdly just thinking that myself. It actually does surprise me that the babeshows are on at all on Christmas Day and New Years Eve.
The show must go on. The babe channels are part of the entertainment business after all.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 29-12-2014 03:55
(29-12-2014 01:43 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: ^ Whoever he is, he's got to compete with the babestation camera operator who thinks that zooming very quickly in and out repeatedly is the height of dramatic erotic cinematography.
Yes good point, that's definitely worth a mention too, almost as bad as the camera held sideways.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 29-12-2014 04:29
admiral yet again you have not read what i have wrote,
(28-12-2014 15:49 )winsaw Wrote: an established main night girl
i will try to make my self clearer for you, at no point do i say the hole roster is on top wrack, a channel has 1 "main" night girls ie the girl who is at the top of the company who will work 1 or 2 shifts a week, below that you have a wide spread of wage from girls on £200 to a lot more than that,
i hope this is clearer i just assumed people would know what i meant