RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 07-01-2018 16:06
(07-01-2018 09:05 )HannahsPet Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:01 )Nadam Wrote: (07-01-2018 08:19 )HannahsPet Wrote: doubt shes even gone to the police after she was slagging them off in the press after her £1000 fine for Using her mobile while driving
I didn't know that she'd done that too. She seems like such a lovely person...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5121145/Glamour-model-35-caught-mobile-wheel.html
she was bragging that the money she had got because of the headlines from onlyfans subscriptions would more than pay the fine
dannii is only 35? wow musta had a hard paper round as a kid.
honestly i thought she was 40-43
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Nadam - 07-01-2018 16:17
(07-01-2018 16:06 )HEX!T Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:05 )HannahsPet Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:01 )Nadam Wrote: (07-01-2018 08:19 )HannahsPet Wrote: doubt shes even gone to the police after she was slagging them off in the press after her £1000 fine for Using her mobile while driving
I didn't know that she'd done that too. She seems like such a lovely person...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5121145/Glamour-model-35-caught-mobile-wheel.html
she was bragging that the money she had got because of the headlines from onlyfans subscriptions would more than pay the fine
dannii is only 35? wow musta had a hard paper round as a kid.
honestly i thought she was 40-43
Yes, I was thinking the same. She seems to have been around forever.
All those Twitter feuds and rants must put ages on a person!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babefan2012 - 07-01-2018 16:25
(07-01-2018 09:27 )Rammyrascal Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:25 )Nadam Wrote: Imagine being related to one of these vacuous, self centred money grabbers?
No thanks!
Not all babeshow babes are like this, please don’t tar them all with the same brush. Plenty of good ones out there who aren’t “vacuous, self cantered money grabbers”
But be honest there’s more like that than not.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Nadam - 07-01-2018 16:36
(07-01-2018 16:25 )babefan2012 Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:27 )Rammyrascal Wrote: (07-01-2018 09:25 )Nadam Wrote: Imagine being related to one of these vacuous, self centred money grabbers?
No thanks!
Not all babeshow babes are like this, please don’t tar them all with the same brush. Plenty of good ones out there who aren’t “vacuous, self cantered money grabbers”
But be honest there’s more like that than not.
Bang on the money sir.
Also, when certain babes have a go at something they've seen on this forum they call us "free loaders" and "pathetic wankers" and other babes are quick to chime in with their agreement. You don't hear them rushing to defend us or saying "don't tar all forum members with the same brush".
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babefan2012 - 07-01-2018 17:03
True. Collectively the vast majority of babes dislike and distain for this forum is pretty clear. A few do come and see positive comments and remark on them, the ones who have distain and dislike are the exact same ones who think we’re all pathetic, free loading sados. Hardly surprising really.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 07-01-2018 17:30
Some of these girls are on at least 3/6d an hour
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-01-2018 08:39
Bs needs to get its stints & breaks better organised throughout the night because at several occasions last night bs had one show being shown/simulcast on 3 channels. One example being bs had the Olivia & Sophie Hart shower show on 3 channels & Lilly Roma on the other.
Meant certain babes last night didn’t get much screentime on sky which to me were Charley Green & Kiki Daniels
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 08-01-2018 12:54
(04-01-2018 05:48 )Kevin555 Wrote: Hi
The Share price is interesting lost around 40% of its value in the last 9 weeks.
See attached
According to this article, this was, at least in part, due to Cellcast's continued difficulties in getting hold of 3/4mil investment monies they are claiming: http://www.lse.co.uk/AllNews.asp?code=0fcc42jf&headline=Cellcast_To_Make_Provision_For_Holding_In_Lexinta_Fund_In_2017_Results
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - eoinindahouze - 08-01-2018 13:09
(08-01-2018 12:54 )ShandyHand Wrote: (04-01-2018 05:48 )Kevin555 Wrote: Hi
The Share price is interesting lost around 40% of its value in the last 9 weeks.
See attached
According to this article, this was, at least in part, due to Cellcast's continued difficulties in getting hold of 3/4mil investment monies they are claiming: http://www.lse.co.uk/AllNews.asp?code=0fcc42jf&headline=Cellcast_To_Make_Provision_For_Holding_In_Lexinta_Fund_In_2017_Results
So does that mean they are in financial difficulty?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 08-01-2018 14:38
^ No. Last we heard (November time) they were back making a profit again. That's why they are expanding the web side of things, that they say has forged the turnaround.
Cellcast's public statements are at pains to point out too that they have plenty cash reserves to cover while they wait for this cash. The markets just don't like any uncertainy. That's all we can see anyhow.
|