+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Gibbs Luvs Dani O - 26-11-2012 18:35
I'm not for Ofcom,but doesn't South Park have parental warning before the show starts.
I think i know the episode your on about.I can also mind an episode when they had a counter on screen for every time they used a certain curse word,which i can't remember what it was.
They must have said the word about 500 times if i remember right. The amount of times i have watched South Park showing the gang going to Raisins,(A Hooters piss take) which is a diner full of 3rd/4th graders,Or Family Guy showing Peter lusting after Connie DiMeako who is one of Megs schoolmates. And whats the excuse they always use,That it's a cartoon and not real.
They maybe right,but the subject matter is very real.
But we never hear about Ofcom hounding them for any breaches of regulations.
It's one rule for some and f#*koff to the rest.
B#stards
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-11-2012 02:51
This is fucked up. Just watching the sex education show just now on more4. And guess what they are showing practically a hardcore porno movie to the youngsters at the school. It's fucking wrong.
I'm seeing open leg pussy on here. Something the babe channels which is aimed at an adult audience isn't allowed to show.
In year's to come we'll all look back at this moment in history with utter disbelief. It's not so much double standards but downright fucking madness.
The whole of ofcom need to be carted off to the nearest looney asylum.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 27-11-2012 08:23
(27-11-2012 02:51 )Scottishbloke Wrote: This is fucked up. Just watching the sex education show just now on more4. And guess what they are showing practically a hardcore porno movie to the youngsters at the school. It's fucking wrong.
...
I always found that show highly dubious for that very reason. Yes we should teach our kids about sex, but is it really neccessary to show them close-ups of male and female genetalia, or have live naked models in the classroom to do so. This just seemed like illicit titillation to me in the guise of being 'educational'.
Bear in mind that this is the same team that occupied WHSmiths in protest at Lads Mags being on shelves where they are accessible to kids! Now that is double standards.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 27-11-2012 10:17
(25-11-2012 23:19 )fedup Wrote: Whats happened to jimmyt73,,it says sin binned? Means nothing to me but he is a good chap.hi im back nice to know someone misses me on here
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mido - 27-11-2012 18:42
Cant you all see what your doing?
Scottishbloke is working himself into a wreck trying to get Ofcom to go easy on the shows for us and you know why? because we are ALL letting him!
We need to share the burden from him, not every man can carry the weight of the world on their shoulders alone, when was the last time any of the rest of you spoke to Ofcom for him rather than each other? Your leaving it all to this one man to do and as a result he is no longer enjoying the shows or the forum.
Scottishbloke I will make the start and put the complaint to Ofcom, I think others here need to stop talking at start acting.
Come now brothers, let us back this man rather than fight among ourselves!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-11-2012 18:58
Thanks for that post mido. It really was comical genious
I wouldn't go as far to say I no longer enjoy the shows or this forum. Thanks anyway but I really don't need a spokesman even though your intentions were good 
Also I'm not too upset to post either 
But for me it's all about collective responsiblity. I think a lot of us on this forum have done our bit. Eccles and the petition last year was a really good idea. A few of us have also sent e-mails to ofcom but as expected we seldom get a responce. Fed up is fed up because of the sexest mentality of ofcom. Ok to show penis's and not the vagina. It's all about us all pulling together in the right direction. continental is too angry to post and eccles is too busy disecting a frog as we speak and fuck knows what's happened to Stan lately
I am ofcourse only joking Keep up the fight well into 2013 and beyond and one day we'll have the bastards eating humble pie. That I promise you
RE: Ofcom Discussion - The Truth - 27-11-2012 19:12
No disrespect intended here,but once people start regurgitating the same speeches over & over,pretty much means that the voices of discontent aired on the forum regarding ofcom have not yielded results,therefore the whole anti ofcom rhetoric is nowt but a way to vent rather than having any significant meaning.
If people are really serious about tackling ofcom's iron rule,they need to change tact,less talk more action. Banners on the streets of London outside Parliament,seek an audience with their local MP's,More direct emails to ofcom themselves,that sort of thing.
And before anyone accuses me of anything,I signed the petition twice and as far I know that avenue is now closed.
I'm not saying people shouldn't vent their frustrations but this thread is now starting to loose it's credibility.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 27-11-2012 21:22
(27-11-2012 18:42 )mido Wrote: Cant you all see what your doing?
Scottishbloke is working himself into a wreck trying to get Ofcom to go easy on the shows for us and you know why? because we are ALL letting him!
We need to share the burden from him, not every man can carry the weight of the world on their shoulders alone, when was the last time any of the rest of you spoke to Ofcom for him rather than each other? Your leaving it all to this one man to do and as a result he is no longer enjoying the shows or the forum.
Scottishbloke I will make the start and put the complaint to Ofcom, I think others here need to stop talking at start acting.
Come now brothers, let us back this man rather than fight among ourselves!
I have spent most of this year complaining to ofcom/bbfc/channel 4/channel5/daily star via text message.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 27-11-2012 21:45
(26-11-2012 18:10 )elroyticklestab Wrote: Fear not SB South Park can go for as many Christians, Sikhs, Jews, fat people, ugly people etc as it likes. Now Muslims could be another matter........
The single biggest annoying factor is double standards. Male nudity is fine, female nudity is utter filth.
Fantastic post and as female nudity(down below) is banned the babe channels cant go any further..
There are lots of double standards on UK tv too long to list which does not make sense..Ok from now on any double standards i see i will email ofcom for a response...You cant let your son have a games console but deny your daughter one cause she is female...Ofcom allow some programmes to break rules and others not..i will start to point this out but unless a large amount of others complain ofcom give themselves an easy ride by just saying not investigated..If they have to investigate its work for them which at 67 grand a year is disgusting.
So ofcom dont do their job for which they are extortionatly paid for so you go to Graham Howell who also does not do his job,,what next go to police?? They all stick up for each other this government and the amount wasted by them is pure sickly evil but they still keep their jobs when they should be in jail..This MP lost the taxpayer 45 million quid on West coast Mainline fiasco yet gets to keep her job.Now she managing famine relief,ha,taking piss or what if i lost my company money i would be sacked..Arggghhhh its like how to infiltrate these idiots in charge with their big wages and protection.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-11-2012 22:41
The only thing is fedup is that you should be very careful what you wish for. As much as it is very honourable for you to e-mail ofcom or complain to them and highlight their inconsitencys knowing the twisted bunch they are. What next - Ban South Park
I'm in favour of the 9 O'clock watershed and programmes before that of an adult nature should be pin protected. At the moment there is a proposal by the mainstream channels to lobby ofcom for change into allowing for more adult content to be shown pre watershed. However to date it's still unknown or clear whether such a proposal has taken place regarding the 900+ channels.
It's really an awkward one to call at the moment. But certainly fedup you are 100% correct in your conclusions based on what they really ought to be doing. Genrerally accepted standards should apply to all, not just ones that ofcom deem to be easy targets.