+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Cams (/forumdisplay.php?fid=374)
+--- Forum: Babestation Cams (/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+---- Forum: Kandi Kay (/forumdisplay.php?fid=270)
+---- Thread: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion (Only) (/showthread.php?tid=61167)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - Regenerated - 02-08-2014 10:59
(02-08-2014 09:13 )Rammyrascal Wrote: can I request that the ultimate babe 2014 be cancelled and just give it to kandi please
No.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - jimmyt73 - 02-08-2014 11:06
Great show from Kandi last night,my only negative was although it was great to see her in the shower it was hardly ever switched on,i mean if they are going to put a babe as good as Kandi in there they have should allowed her to get soaped up,the decision not to meant that the stint was shortened due to only being allowed to use oil which you dont need the shower for.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - Snooks - 02-08-2014 11:55
(02-08-2014 11:06 )jimmyt73 Wrote: Great show from Kandi last night,my only negative was although it was great to see her in the shower it was hardly ever switched on,i mean if they are going to put a babe as good as Kandi in there they have should allowed her to get soaped up,the decision not to meant that the stint was shortened due to only being allowed to use oil which you dont need the shower for.
Having spoken to Kandi the reason why the stint was cut short was actually lack of calls. If people don't call in then stints in sets like that will get cut short.
A lot of the babes take the view that they are not just going to give non callers a free thrill without calls.
It seems that many people requested a shower stint but that very few of them called in.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - southlondonphil - 02-08-2014 12:06
(02-08-2014 11:55 )snookered147 Wrote: Having spoken to Kandi the reason why the stint was cut short was actually lack of calls.
Yes, lack of calls. I have known similar things happen on other occasions. It should be obvious to everyone by now that if they want a certain scene to continue they need to call in.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - Snooks - 02-08-2014 12:27
(02-08-2014 10:59 )Regenerated Wrote:(02-08-2014 09:13 )Rammyrascal Wrote: can I request that the ultimate babe 2014 be cancelled and just give it to kandi please
No.
This years tournament is going to be very competitive imo.
I look forward to starting proceedings in early December
.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - jimmyt73 - 02-08-2014 15:58
(02-08-2014 11:55 )snookered147 Wrote: Having spoken to Kandi the reason why the stint was cut short was actually lack of calls. If people don't call in then stints in sets like that will get cut short.Though i dont expect to get a free show,when one caller makes a request within the rules it should be enough for any babe to act upon it,after all its supposed to be an adult interactive show,for example you have spoken to her alot recently and been happy with her responces to your requests to get naked but how would you have felt if she told you she would not do it unless she had multiple other callers requesting it.
A lot of the babes take the view that they are not just going to give non callers a free thrill without calls.
It seems that many people requested a shower stint but that very few of them called in.
What we have seen recently is an increase in this webcam type mentality from quite a few babes who dont like the idea of people watching who are not paying,as ive said before every viewer is a potential customer and some need at least some visual incentive to call ,especially for a channel that has seen quite a decline which its only recently recovering from,im not sure it can afford to use a babe who seems ill at ease with the reality of what she is doing and how and where its available.
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - broncobilly10 - 02-08-2014 16:43
It should not be the girls choice to cut a set short
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - hairbald - 02-08-2014 16:45
(02-08-2014 15:58 )jimmyt73 Wrote: SNIPJimmy - you make a good point.
What we have seen recently is an increase in this webcam type mentality from quite a few babes who dont like the idea of people watching who are not paying,as ive said before every viewer is a potential customer and some need at least some visual incentive to call ,especially for a channel that has seen quite a decline which its only recently recovering from,im not sure it can afford to use a babe who seems ill at ease with the reality of what she is doing and how and where its available.
With Webcam you have less of a "shop window" so there is no ability to freeload; therefore every interaction is paid for by us the punters and nothing is free (though there is one girl (who will remain anonymous) who told people on a cam session with S66 behind the pay wall that they had to tip because they weren't getting it for free, totally oblivious to the £1.50 per minute she was getting off the 10 people on line
:rolleyes
With the TV shows you have the ability to entice the punter to call which you don't get on cam so much (girls rarely stay in freeview on S66 and I can't recall the last girl I saw on AW using free chat). MFC is different but that really shows the UK girls up for being a bit thick when they sit there looking mardy waiting for someone to take them private (why would you when you've got a load of freindly and bouncy US girls who know how to grab an audience. Only UK girl I've seen on MFC with any savy is Sophia Knight.
Having had to tolerate a few of the Mary Portas shows (wife likes them) she has a simple mantra which is that the shop window has to make you want to go in. If a few more girls twigged that (and I think to be fair to Kandi she's in no way the worst - far from it) then they will get more people to call. You get some horrors (like Mica and Hannah) who look miserable between calls and then you get a few who think they may need to call to entice (Delia, Danni H, Lori, etc); you know the brighter ones
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - HannahsPet - 02-08-2014 17:31
All she did what cut the shower set short because no one was calling guessing when she went back to the bed she obviously got more callers so was in the best interest for her and the channel to put her back on the bed
obviuosly people were to busy wanking to call
for those complaining why dont u spend 30 mins cold naked covered in babyoil in the cold shower with it not being on
and see if its any funand Jimmyif the line she uses i want 5 callers on the line and i will go naked is not motivation for anyone to stop wanking for a min and pick up the phone then i dont know what the hell is !!!!
RE: Kandi Kay - Studio 66 - Chat and Discussion - The Silent Majority - 02-08-2014 18:09
(02-08-2014 16:43 )Broncobilly Wrote: It should not be the girls choice to cut a set short
A girl with Kandi's experience will know when a set's not working for some reason.
A producer who ignores that and makes her carry on regardless is just stupid.