RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 16-05-2018 17:27
credit where its due ,the first 45 minutes of last nights show (10 pm start i refer to) has to be the best ive seen in a long time ,in fact i cant remember a show starting with with so much on show (scarlett jones) ,amazing stuff
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - southsidestu - 16-05-2018 22:59
Saskia Jade is on right now and looking amazing, I doubt she will take that bra off but her movement is really good for a first timer
She is quite the sexy little minx
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babefan2012 - 16-05-2018 23:45
Yeah Saskia is most definitely not shy which is what makes the restriction so stupid, but it is her first show which is guaranteed non topless for every single new babe. Just hope she progresses and is allowed to progress.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - southsidestu - 17-05-2018 00:17
We've been here before though with Chloe, you were absolutely adamant that she was never going to be topless and that her tease shows were lacklustre and boring. Then she jumped in the shower naked and you actually apologised to her on the forum
You were also adamant that BS plan was that all new babes would be topless on cam only but Bella and Dixie also started as non topless and progressed to topless
Do you not just fancy embracing a bit of optimism for the sake of your own welfare, think of yourself man
say it with me Chloe, Bella and Dixie are all topless so there are good odds that Saskia can be too
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babefan2012 - 17-05-2018 08:44
(17-05-2018 00:17 )southsidestu Wrote: We've been here before though with Chloe, you were absolutely adamant that she was never going to be topless and that her tease shows were lacklustre and boring. Then she jumped in the shower naked and you actually apologised to her on the forum
You were also adamant that BS plan was that all new babes would be topless on cam only but Bella and Dixie also started as non topless and progressed to topless
Do you not just fancy embracing a bit of optimism for the sake of your own welfare, think of yourself man
say it with me Chloe, Bella and Dixie are all topless so there are good odds that Saskia can be too
My welfare is perfectly fine thank you. I never said Saskia won’t be, I just said for someone who isn’t shy and is clearly naughty restricting her makes little sense.
I believe that that was the initial plan but maybe the some of the babes were more adamant about being topless so the plan didn’t work out, because some were highly adamant about not being topless.
Chloe’s shows were lacklustre and boring, she looked like a rabbit caught in a cars headlights in those first few shows and very unsexy. Now its way way better. Maybe Chloe just told BS to let her go topless.
About Dixie and Bella I just said how long is it going to be before they are allowed of the reigns. Both we’re clearly wanting to.
I’m a cynical pessimist so I don’t look at things from an idealistic positive view point. Yeah Saskia will no doubt be finally allowed to go topless if she wants but you got the inevitable BS amount of shows before she’s allowed to unless she demands to. It’s just pointless and not a great watch.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 17-05-2018 09:52
^ I think the 'plan' is that new babes are kept non-topless adlong as BS's automated spreadsheets say they should be kept non-topless. In other words as long as it's making more money from them on cam than they would make topless on the phone. That dynamic is alwys likely to shift as the impatient guys (going on cam to see the denied puppies) dwindle off.
Then the babes settle into the more familar pattern of whether they are better at cam or phone and are nominally split accordingly.
Some babes undoubtedly moan about this. (Scarlett has been remarkably vocal on this very forum about such things.) But largely I think it's 'computer says no' until it doesn't.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - southsidestu - 17-05-2018 10:52
I'm guessing this is due to the fact that they are in so much debt and they're just trying to make as much money as possible to pay it off
It's better to have the show under these circumstances than not have it all
Of course even if they had a budget surplus they would probably do it this way, remember when you were told that love makes the world go round? It doesn't, it's money
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 17-05-2018 11:13
We all get why bs do it with new girls, the issue is that they keep at it for to long, you talk to girls about it who have been restricted and they tell you that after the first handful of shows the number paying to see boob drops off a lot, and more interesting they get more cam traffic once they become topless girls, add the increase in calls and you can see why some girls have got frustrated when it's dragged on and ended up saying they would stop doing nights unless things changed,
The hole Macie fiasco shows that she could already be at that point where it's starting to hurt her stats as she did not go private very much last night and wasn't on the phone all the time,
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - southsidestu - 17-05-2018 11:18
money over common sense
money over staff welfare
money over viewers
money over everything even if it spites them
These are the golden rules to running a business
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 17-05-2018 12:56
Shortermism. It's what you get when you rely too much on computer predictions.
There computer can't know how many guys are reacting badly to what they do. Any predictions are only as good as the data it has. The data has limits so the predictions have limits. You'd hope BS realise that.
|