+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Headgear - 22-05-2015 11:47
What a boring night sat night - waited up until midnight for Tori to go in x streams with no joy - I don't know if she went on later but sin TV should remember some of us have to get up in the morning to go to work!
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - DB83 - 22-05-2015 12:19
^^ But would you have called in ?
The reason why the stream(s) are not being used is because few are calling in. Not getting at you personally but that is a simple fact.
So while guys do not like seeing more than one gal on-screen at a time, their possible saviour will be if both get calls. Only problem there is that the sets are not really designed for more than one girl so it then becomes a game of sardines.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - nilford - 22-05-2015 15:40
(22-05-2015 12:19 )DB83 Wrote: The reason why the stream(s) are not being used is because few are calling in.
Initially, for some of the time, Sin was using some of the streams to show alternate views of the same babe(s) on one set (the double bed set and the large bar/dance pole set, mainly or entirely). Far be it from someone who has staked nothing personally in order to bring the channel into being to condemn the decisions of the channel's producers, but if this feature has been abandoned, then has it not been abandoned too soon? I thought it was a quality innovation. Lacey fans, say, who liked boobs best could enjoy a more frontally-oriented show on Stream 1, while those who loved her legs could get an eyeful of the latter via an angled camera on Stream 2. Terrific!
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 22-05-2015 17:43
(22-05-2015 11:47 )Headgear Wrote: What a boring night sat night - waited up until midnight for Tori to go in x streams with no joy - I don't know if she went on later but sin TV should remember some of us have to get up in the morning to go to work!Nope Tori wasn't on the x stream at all last night, Tiffany went on the x stream at about 5am what was the fucking point of that when they struggle for calls at 11pm and 12am?
Tbh Sin TV has massively gone down hill since i last watched it properly 2 weeks ago, The picture quality on the stream isn't as good, the lighting isn't as good, too many annoying OSG's that do my head in when they flash across the screen every 2 minutes, too many ad breaks and Tori and Tiffany were swapping over every 20 minutes, plus im not one to really moan about sets but the laundry room set looks terrible
Plus Tori was pretty poor compared to her recent shows, the trouble is when she goes from putting on some of her best ever shows a couple of weeks ago to doing a Louise Porter type show then its a massive step backwards, even Tiffany was wearing less clothes than Tori last night, i can accept crap/average shows from her as she is my favourite babe but not when she is wearing a bra and stockings all night
Maybe im overeating but last night was really poor, if they are only going to use one channel from now on then there is no point in having more than 2 babes on a night, its not so bad watching 2 or 3 babes share one channel if you have sky but watching it on a average quality stream is pointless its almost as bad as watching xxpanded, hopefully tonight is better and i can sing their praises tomorrow
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - moron50 - 22-05-2015 17:54
The channel is rapidly becoming irrelevant for me. The original model was somewhat innovative, particularly the X Streams, but there's nothing to attract me to it now. Whether they're allowed to pimp the X Streams on T.V, I don't know, but the T.V format offers nothing new. A few popular girls, with the same limitations as all the other channels & whilst Tiff was regularly 'complaining' about the producer not letting her do her thing on BS, which in wrestling terms was always a 'work' (for those who get the reference), that's since been confirmed by her lack of nudity when given the opportunity on the X Stream...we know she ain't gonna do that anyway.
Multiple girls on screen at the same time doesn't work imo & never has, with a few exceptions & they were all years ago, like 2007 & it usually leaves the X Streams vacant. If SIN think people are going to continually check the X Streams on the off-chance that someone will appear, they've got another thing coming. I'm pissed off with that malarkey already. It seems neither one thing, nor the other.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - amy1 - 22-05-2015 18:23
They need a set time for the x-tream, 10pm every night, that way everyone that sees the channel knows that theres potentially something harder on their site.
"10pm x-stream special show, naughty hour" flash it across the screen it aint difficult.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 22-05-2015 19:26
(22-05-2015 17:54 )moron50 Wrote: ...If SIN think people are going to continually check the X Streams on the off-chance that someone will appear, they've got another thing coming. I'm pissed off with that malarkey already. It seems neither one thing, nor the other.
Nailed on there I think. I have previously made the case for variety on the xstreams - the hotness of the girl supplanting what they do in terms of content levels. But I am beginning to get the feeling that my terms need to be better defined.
What works best for me, and what I think looks to bring in the most caller/viewers on webstreams (Sin could definitely use the viewer payment model for their streams at some point let's not forget), is one of two things:
1. Hot girls that you would normally only see doing day-type shows revealing quite a bit more than they would on TV. Full nudity is not an essential on this one.
2. The full monty - i.e. open legged but not necessarily any more than that - preferably with a fit girl I recognise and like from the TV. If not, then the girl probably needs to go a little further in her content levels.
The third category (i.e. all points in between) is far more difficult to pull off long-term. To me it requires a very hot girl who is very good at tease. (Tori has been excelling in this category recently.)
IMO, too many of Sin's girls fall someway short in this middle ground on the streams atm. Sorry to say but just falling short of revealing the goods on webstream is often simply not encouraging to those watching.
Whilst it looked, initially, like Sin might have had the answer to the currently moribund babe show format with their xstreams. I now think they could do worse than to look towards what s66 are doing with their new daytime studio cams.
Like nilford says Sin have not utilised their potential for second angle cams nearly enough. If they are struggling to find high calibre girls that will work to the levels needed for the established type streams... then I can't think of many better ways to raise awareness of your website and your xstreams capabilities than promoting the prospect of staring at Kara's arse (or similar) for many an early evening hour!
Why even start the streams after 9 anyhow? I can see there being little market for them during they day but, surely, from say 7pm there are enough guys settled down for the evening looking for their regular babe fix? Get a march on some of your rivals Sin. The right content at the right times will build the xstreams audience given time I'm sure.
Expecting everyone to jump on board from the get go was always going to be a big ask. It is no coincidence that the more successful webstreams in the babe show sphere have been built upon already known brand names. If they are to pick themselves up from this faltering start at all, Sin still have some way to go to get to that point... .
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - richpk - 22-05-2015 20:07
if they want to stand out from the rest and move babeshows forward, they need to start recruiting new talent and expand the variety. if this isnt possible, then there is no point of SINtv and the ladies will end up move back to where they came from
instead of something new and fresh we have ended up with something worse than we already have. not the ladies fault i'm sure, but whoever is behind the scenes running this joint is wasting some serious cash right now
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 22-05-2015 20:36
(22-05-2015 20:07 )richpk Wrote: if they want to stand out from the rest and move babeshows forward, they need to start recruiting new talent and expand the variety. if this isnt possible, then there is no point of SINtv and the ladies will end up move back to where they came from
instead of something new and fresh we have ended up with something worse than we already have. not the ladies fault i'm sure, but whoever is behind the scenes running this joint is wasting some serious cash right now
I'm beginning to wonder if one of the backers is a certain Mike Ashley....
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 22-05-2015 20:57
Can't wait until Caty Cole joins this channel