RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - aaron - 10-09-2018 12:28
(10-09-2018 11:04 )GreenMachine Wrote: I've not seen that sort of thing before so it was different to me. I realise seasoned hacks here feel it is same old, same old but to others it may well be new-we're not all as cynical as some people on here.
The Nicole POV was very good. I hope you liked it as much as I did.
I think you should ignore the cynics, because they will say that everything is bad no matter what's broadcast.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 10-09-2018 13:03
I did Aaron I suppose I've become a PoV fiend and when it's done well it can be great but I admit some are fairly boring especially when done every night and by the same girl-a bit of variety is good at times but I could do without the girl bigging up the Mr P's as some Adonis or godlike person -half the time he shakes it so much the picture breaks up-not sure they were ever designed to mimic earthquakes Nicole seemed very at ease with the Mrs P this time.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 10-09-2018 16:23
(10-09-2018 12:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote: (10-09-2018 11:55 )winsaw Wrote: she's not the first woman to work a camera on a babeshow lol,
Megan used to be pretty good. If only they'd persuaded her to stay on.
Maybe a producer who's also had experience in front of the camera would make a difference.
Oh yes, a hot girl like Nicole deserved someone like Megan shooting her. She handled that roaming cam like a pro alright.
Just watched some of Nicole POV before my recording cut out, and more or less lived up (or is that down ) to my expectations. What gets me is she was wearing her panties yet the camera still tried to keep her top half in frame Are BS afraid of actually roaming her full body? As I say, predictable stuff.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 10-09-2018 19:11
(10-09-2018 12:28 )aaron Wrote: (10-09-2018 11:04 )GreenMachine Wrote: I've not seen that sort of thing before so it was different to me. I realise seasoned hacks here feel it is same old, same old but to others it may well be new-we're not all as cynical as some people on here.
The Nicole POV was very good. I hope you liked it as much as I did.
I think you should ignore the cynics, because they will say that everything is bad no matter what's broadcast.
im sorry but did i miss something during her pov,?she was naked a lot of the time on normal cam but from what i saw she wore panties throughout the pov and it was very limited to a lot of above waist shots
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 10-09-2018 20:01
Yes indeed she did wear panties for that but as the old song goes by Jermaine Jackson "we don't have to take our clothes off, to have a good time..." Anyway I liked it even if you didn't.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 10-09-2018 20:24
(10-09-2018 20:01 )GreenMachine Wrote: Yes indeed she did wear panties for that but as the old song goes by Jermaine Jackson "we don't have to take our clothes off, to have a good time..." Anyway I liked it even if you didn't.
where? and i quote in what sentence did i mention the words "i didnt" like it ?,
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 10-09-2018 20:36
Chill out man for gawds sake you take things too seriously. I'm not having a go at you.
Who is MR P?
Sarge?
No!
Rosemary the telephone operator?
No!
Penry the mild mannered janitor(who is secretly producing a television programme as a side line?)
COULD BE!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dan Volatile - 10-09-2018 20:47
(10-09-2018 12:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote: (10-09-2018 11:55 )winsaw Wrote: she's not the first woman to work a camera on a babeshow lol,
Megan used to be pretty good. If only they'd persuaded her to stay on.
Maybe a producer who's also had experience in front of the camera would make a difference.
Dear old Megan and her trusty wobblicam. You're right, in those days povs were not just pervecam adverts, they were actually worth watching in themselves - which is precisely why they stopped them.
I doubt if they could have persuaded her to stay on given that she's now a young executive in a multinational company.
In her bio on their website it says that in her previous job "she forged a successful career in media and sales" which made me chuckle. Nothing about "Image analysis and assessment" or rating the wangs as it was called.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 10-09-2018 20:48
(10-09-2018 20:36 )GreenMachine Wrote: Chill out man for gawds sake you take things too seriously. I'm not having a go at you.
Who is MR P?
Sarge?
No!
Rosemary the telephone operator?
No!
Penry the mild mannered janitor(who is secretly producing a television programme as a side line?)
COULD BE!!
dont try to put words in my mouth then or refer to my posts as if they include something thats not there ,i suggest its your fingers chill on the keyboard and on practically every thread and post on here you comment on ,in fact i would much prefer it if you can refrain from replying to anything in future i post on here and ill do like wise with your crap
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tumble_Drier - 10-09-2018 21:03
(10-09-2018 20:01 )GreenMachine Wrote: as the old song goes by Jermaine Jackson "we don't have to take our clothes off, to have a good time..."
That was Jermaine Stewart
|