+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - arron88 - 01-01-2013 16:11
There is a new licence with a company associated with Babestation and it was issued at the end of November 2012. The name of channel is similar to that of the broadcasting company, maybe it will be renamed or the list doesn't reflect a name change yet.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 01-01-2013 16:18
As luck as it i recorded BS1 on freeview Ch 172 last night, i have only just had a look through it, and to back up what SB say's Tiffany came on the mic at around 4.20am and announced that they had now got a new licence for this channel and said what SB quoted she had said ie "we can now touch, we can now lick", Freeview 172 used to have the Ofcom licence so it does look like they have given up the Ofcom licence and are now using a Dutch licence .
PS, Ofcom do not list in their bulletins any new licence's granted by any overseas regulatory body's , they only list licences granted by themselves, If BS on freeview Ch 172 has got a new non Ofcom licence then it will not be in Ofcom's bulletins, but if they have given the Ofcom licence up for this channel then that will be mentioned as "handing back the licence" .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 01-01-2013 16:26
(01-01-2013 16:18 )mr mystery Wrote: As luck as it i recorded BS1 on freeview Ch 172 last night, i have only just had a look through it, and to back up what SB say's Tiffany came on the mic at around 4.20am and announced that they had now got a new licence for this channel and said what SB quoted she had said ie "we can now touch, we can now lick", Freeview 172 used to have the Ofcom licence so it does look like they have given up the Ofcom licence and are now using a Dutch licence .
Sounds about right. Just wish it was another babe channel that had a Dutch licence.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 01-01-2013 16:26
(01-01-2013 16:18 )mr mystery Wrote: As luck as it i recorded BS1 on freeview Ch 172 last night, i have only just had a look through it, and to back up what SB say's Tiffany came on the mic at around 4.20am and announced that they had now got a new licence for this channel and said what SB quoted she had said ie "we can now touch, we can now lick", Freeview 172 used to have the Ofcom licence so it does look like they have given up the Ofcom licence and are now using a Dutch licence .
This is really quite interesting. I wonder to what degree they're talking about regards touching? Are we finally going to see some of this rumoured 'freedom' the Dutch license permits?
Will be watching tonight with interest (not something I say often about BS).
(01-01-2013 12:16 )mr mystery Wrote: There is also the fact that why should BS push things on the regular channels for free when they can charge a fiver for people to watch BSX encrypted, so you're not likely to see much more on the regular BS channels whatever licence they have because it could have a impact on revenue for BSX or pic/vids that people buy .
Agreed, but surely a double Dutch will make a slight difference, if only it being the cameramen not crapping themselves everytime one of their girls accidentally flashes minge. I don't think the odd flash of pussy - intentional or not - and a bit of nipple licking is going to pull the BSX viewers away.
For a change, I'm going to look optimistically at this one. As far as the babeshows are concerned my pessimism has always come to fruition - maybe it works the other way round too
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 01-01-2013 16:41
Just wanted to know if its possible for all uk babechannels to be Dutch regulated or is it too costly.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 01-01-2013 16:57
(01-01-2013 16:41 )jimmyt73 Wrote: Just wanted to know if its possible for all uk babechannels to be Dutch regulated or is it too costly.
Dutch licenses are only awarded to dutch companies. Cellcast's parent company is based in Netherlands, hence they can get the dutch license, all the other UK babechannels are UK companies.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 01-01-2013 17:09
(01-01-2013 16:57 )munch1917 Wrote:(01-01-2013 16:41 )jimmyt73 Wrote: Just wanted to know if its possible for all uk babechannels to be Dutch regulated or is it too costly.
Dutch licenses are only awarded to dutch companies. Cellcast's parent company is based in Netherlands, hence they can get the dutch license, all the other UK babechannels are UK companies.
I think Playboy has a presence in the Netherlands too. They would possibly qualify I think if they wanted to go that way...
RE: Ofcom Discussion - winsaw - 01-01-2013 17:20
(01-01-2013 17:09 )shylok Wrote: I think Playboy has a big presence in the Netherlands too. They would qualify too I think if they wanted to go that way...
you are spot on mate playboy is Playboy Tv UK/Benelux Ltd (for anyone who don't know Benelux = Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg), so would guess all it would take is playboy to put their name on the top of all the paperwork and tell ofcom there office is now in amsterdam
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 01-01-2013 17:26
(01-01-2013 17:20 )winsaw Wrote:(01-01-2013 17:09 )shylok Wrote: I think Playboy has a big presence in the Netherlands too. They would qualify too I think if they wanted to go that way...
you are spot on mate playboy is Playboy Tv UK/Benelux Ltd (for anyone who don't know Benelux = Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg), so would guess all it would take is playboy to put their name on the top of all the paperwork and tell ofcom there office is now in amsterdam
Yes indeed even though much of their operation is UK based they DO have an office in NL. The presence on NL soil would help them qualify...
I'm hoping this episode will encourage the rest of the channels to be 'more inventive'... I'm hoping for a 'domino effect'... so to speak...
Even the channel who shall not be named has 2 NL licenses in their back pocket for a rainy day....!
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 01-01-2013 17:29
So if Babestation have this new licence.
Does that mean there is the possibility of proper 2 4 1s again like a few years ago?
