+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - madjack - 14-11-2010 04:40
Great to see most of my favourite girls returning, Lucy Summers,Vixen,SJ,Mel Rook.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RCTV - 14-11-2010 08:25
It is illegal to smoke in the work place, which includes TV studios, unless it is for a specific role which requires it and not just for entertainment, which usually if it's in a theatre or tv studio it won't be a real one, it will be a fake one.
I do smoke, but not a huge amount anymore.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - RCTV - 14-11-2010 08:34
I'm going to bring up the channels going downhill again, *ducks for cover*
The channels are, as there is a very small pool of girls, which has got slightly bigger, BUT the majority of the people phoning are the same people more than once, and usually there is core people that phone and text, and there is some 'new blood' phoning and texting, but no where near as much as there used to be because they channels quality has gone down hill, and in some channels, actually most, are pushing the regs right to the limit, and it is because one channel does it another channel does it.
Are the Channels to Competative? - RCTV - 14-11-2010 08:39
Are the Channels to Competative? One thing I've noticed is the massive swamping of channels from a few big companies, who seem to be competing amongst each other, and the smaller channels aren't approved to broadcast, and often having to team up with another company/companies to even attempt to broadcast so they can compete. Also where girls stay loyal to only one channel and one channel at a time (I know about Charmain Sinclear, but generally).
Thing which made me think was how different other countries are and how channels run by different companies willl often work alongside each other and share girls and studios.
Do you think the channels have becom to competative for viewers?
RE: Are the Channels to Competative? - Winston Wolfe - 15-11-2010 19:05
I think you'll find this is the case in most industries. It generally makes sense to do business deals and work alongside the main players in the industry, as they have a foothold on the marketplace.
This strategy worked well for me in the Horse Racing industry, and I see no reason to change that approach in this business. Sometimes, it's better to accept a smaller piece of a big pie than try and get the whole lot (something a certain company tried to do unsuccessfully in recent months).
RE: Are the Channels to Competative? - ledders69 - 15-11-2010 19:28
Wouldn't label bs as competitive as they seem to stick to same old, same old. Whereas tvx and elite tv are more adventureous and gamble a bit more. BS seems to have a format that suits pornstars and for glamour types it's like stuff you basically. Also I reckon ofcom poke their nose in when it's not wanted down to silly censorship rules. That hurts the channels deeply and makes them more tame than usual. As mrmann says the channels go through the motions. Next year I'd love for more liberalism within the channels because they deserve it.
RE: Are the Channels to Competative? - RCTV - 15-11-2010 22:43
(15-11-2010 19:05 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: I think you'll find this is the case in most industries. It generally makes sense to do business deals and work alongside the main players in the industry, as they have a foothold on the marketplace.
This strategy worked well for me in the Horse Racing industry, and I see no reason to change that approach in this business. Sometimes, it's better to accept a smaller piece of a big pie than try and get the whole lot (something a certain company tried to do unsuccessfully in recent months).
I know, but they don't have to do to even attempt to satisfy another company to allow them to broadcast?
(15-11-2010 19:28 )ledders69 Wrote: Wouldn't label bs as competitive as they seem to stick to same old, same old. Whereas tvx and elite tv are more adventureous and gamble a bit more. BS seems to have a format that suits pornstars and for glamour types it's like stuff you basically. Also I reckon ofcom poke their nose in when it's not wanted down to silly censorship rules. That hurts the channels deeply and makes them more tame than usual. As mrmann says the channels go through the motions. Next year I'd love for more liberalism within the channels because they deserve it.
I agree about ofcom, although i agree with the censorship rules to an extent. I don't think it does tbh, as i think it makes them push the boundaries more, so ofcom are more likely to. I personally think spain has gone way to far the other way, as if I wanted to I could have a girl topless at 1pm on normal tv (which i have done several times) and no one would really moan and i wouldn't be investigated. In spain there are regs, but they are not inforced, especially in the babe industry as it is so small.
RE: Are the Channels to Competative? - mr williams - 17-11-2010 13:48
(15-11-2010 19:28 )ledders69 Wrote: Also I reckon ofcom poke
But that's just the problem - they don't have a poke - I reckon they don't have a sex life of their own so they want to spoil everyone else's - if they poked a bit more they might be a bit more chilled out! Perhaps we should send Zarwood around to their offices to tell them how naughty they've been!
RE: Are the Channels to Competative? - ledders69 - 17-11-2010 20:46
(17-11-2010 13:48 )mr williams Wrote:(15-11-2010 19:28 )ledders69 Wrote: Also I reckon ofcom poke
But that's just the problem - they don't have a poke - I reckon they don't have a sex life of their own so they want to spoil everyone else's - if they poked a bit more they might be a bit more chilled out! Perhaps we should send Zarwood around to their offices to tell them how naughty they've been!
Ofcom spoil the party of the babe channels, thats why bs camerastaff moves from side to side to ensure that babes don't go full frontal or get in their desired positions.
BS also think they are in the comfort zone with the current pornstar format, what they don't see is we like girl variation. There are a couple of girls from daytime who would suit the darkside really well. Unfortunately bs seem to have this current policy of babes who they believe make the most money as oposed to pleasing the viewer.
This channel needs some sort of reform somewhere in the near and distant future. We want to see great shows instead of the stale stuff, the babe channel industries have a lot of talent on the market, yet the producers can't always grasp that talent.
Dirty Talk - do girls audition? - mikeboob - 20-11-2010 14:07
Just had this thought, when stations are looking for talent one supposes they use their eyes first but clearly it helps if the model can make ones ears burn so do they have to do an aural audition if they have no previous checkable history?