+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bluebird TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=165)
+---- Thread: Bluebird TV - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=19210)
RE: Bluebird TV - RRROGER - 14-05-2010 00:43
(14-05-2010 00:32 )Mister Gummidge Wrote: Just a guess here, RRROGER but in any relatively small niche industry, such as the "call TV" industry, gossip spreads like norovirus round a cheap hotel. I live in a small village and can tell you what most of my neighbours are up to and the relative fiscal status of most of them. The business community is no different. People get together, then gossip like fishwives...
No problem with that, but that's why the Romans invented the forum, to provide a stage for windbags like me & BluebirdOfficial to stand up & spout about nothing really important, a tradition continued to great effect in the House of Commons.......
RE: Bluebird TV - RRROGER - 14-05-2010 02:08
BEWARE PLAYBOY TV....
RE: Bluebird TV - admiral decker - 14-05-2010 09:55
(14-05-2010 00:32 )Mister Gummidge Wrote: You know who Mr Bluebird is, right? Owner of a pretty major porn studio, soon to be proprietor of one of the larger 900 channel companies? A man who's hired women and most likely behind the scenes staff who've worked for one or more of the various other companies?
Yes I think Mister Gummidge has hit the nail on the head there. BluebirdTalent appears to have been employed by Cellcast in the past, but I would think that there are a number of Bluebird TV empoyees which have worked for other channels sometime in the past. Forget any theory about Cellcast and Bluebird being the same company. They are linked because Bluebird are leasing a Cellcast channel and that's really all, no need for conspriracy theories.
RE: Bluebird TV - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 14-05-2010 10:35
(14-05-2010 00:24 )RRROGER Wrote: For attention of Bluebird Official, for the benefit of the forum, can you explain what your relationship is with Cellcast & if your debut in this sector will be rebadging Cellcast programming as well as any of your own new content?????
Check out my FutureStatusPredictions thread & note reference to thread "Casting for girls",posted by BluebirdTalent, talent manager for Bluebird, touting for girls to join Bluebird; nothing odd about that, but I think it odd that most of his other posts have been informative & sometimes seemingly inside information about Cellcast shows over the last 18 months.....suggesting he's more than just a fan of the shows; everything I see suggests Bluebird & Cellcast are the same company or in coalition........anyway let's chill out & let's get on with the show, these forums can get a bit heavy sometimes....
Bluebird and Cellcast are completely different companies.
We own all our channels. We don't lease any.
We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
There's lots of information about our owner Paul Chaplin on our Bleubirdfilms.com blog: http://www.bluebirdfilms.com/wordpress_new/?p=2442
RE: Bluebird TV - RRROGER - 14-05-2010 11:24
(14-05-2010 09:55 )admiral decker Wrote: They are linked because Bluebird are leasing a Cellcast channel and that's really all, no need for conspriracy theories.
BluebirdOfficial response was "we own all our channels, we don't lease any"....not even FV99 broadcasting LIVE960(owned by Bluebird)???? & as i've previously posted, BSXtreme seems more Bluebird than Cellcast.
At the end of the day we are a forum,to debate issues large & small,must be something of a relief to BO to have the forum defending him, rather than the earlier diatribes about girl poaching.
RE: Bluebird TV - RRROGER - 14-05-2010 12:21
(14-05-2010 10:35 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
That's a contradiction in terms........
Seems at odds with your earlier reply to accusations of girl poaching, about your "agreement" with Cellcast to not poach their girls; but seems you have a back door recruitment campaign; put the word out on the grapevine, leave the door open, recruit anybody walks in that meets your criteria, find out who they are after signing contract.......... this is where BluebirdTalent comes in???...ex Cellcast????
That way you haven't poached them.....they've poached themselves,& why would Cellcast consent, given a choice, with the recent steady exodus of girls to other channels, not Bluebird....
Remember...Beware Playboy TV...it's not the ides of March on this forum ....
Have a nice day, my local Montgomeryshire pub has got Chiswick's finest beer as guest...Fuller's London Pride & I'm off to get some down my neck...this posting is thirsty work.
RE: Bluebird TV - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 14-05-2010 23:16
(14-05-2010 12:21 )RRROGER Wrote:(14-05-2010 10:35 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote: We have an agreement with Cellcast not to take their talent without their prior consent. As will have been noticed, they have consented to some talent transfers.
Also - we don't know who shot Kennedy
That's a contradiction in terms........
Seems at odds with your earlier reply to accusations of girl poaching, about your "agreement" with Cellcast to not poach their girls; but seems you have a back door recruitment campaign; put the word out on the grapevine, leave the door open, recruit anybody walks in that meets your criteria, find out who they are after signing contract.......... this is where BluebirdTalent comes in???...ex Cellcast????
That way you haven't poached them.....they've poached themselves,& why would Cellcast consent, given a choice, with the recent steady exodus of girls to other channels, not Bluebird....
Remember...Beware Playboy TV...it's not the ides of March on this forum ....
Have a nice day, my local Montgomeryshire pub has got Chiswick's finest beer as guest...Fuller's London Pride & I'm off to get some down my neck...this posting is thirsty work.
Nope, sorry you've lost us now.
What we just posted was completely clear.
Everyone understands what "not without their consent" means. There is no contradiction.
This latest 'backdoor/grapevine' conspiracy theory makes no sense in itself: such a policy would be in breach of our agreement with Cellcast.
What exactly is everyone supposed to worry about with Playboy by the way ? That the weight of their unpayable bond debt papers is gonna fall on someone's foot?
Our US TV output is already outselling PB in every state & on every platform.
RE: Bluebird TV - Digital Dave - 15-05-2010 02:30
I've no idea what the stuttering RRROGER is going on about personally. In particular his 'Beware Playboy' nonsense.
I think he's LLLOST IT!
RE: Bluebird TV - elgar1uk - 15-05-2010 08:17
(14-05-2010 12:21 )RRROGER Wrote: Remember...Beware Playboy TV...it's not the ides of March on this forum ....
Ides of March? Is Julius Caear running a babe channel? Or are you comparing someone to Julius Caesar?
RE: Bluebird TV - sharinel - 15-05-2010 10:31
Friends, Romans, Countrymen....Lend me your babes!