+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Discussion and thoughts - sid_bridge - 30-11-2009 12:01
Yes I saw Club Paradiso last night and I thought the lighting could have been better. I also thought the camera could have given a closer shot sometimes. There were times when the girls seemed a bit distant to what they could have been.
RE: Discussion and thoughts - SirAssAlot - 30-11-2009 12:12
(30-11-2009 12:01 )sid_bridge Wrote: Yes I saw Club Paradiso last night and I thought the lighting could have been better. I also thought the camera could have given a closer shot sometimes. There were times when the girls seemed a bit distant to what they could have been.
I've said something similar to that about the camera work so has a few other members. Bob said a while ago he got new equipment for the camera so it would move around the girls instead of the camera being in 1 place but I guess it was BS cause I haven’t seen any changes apart from a new set.
RE: Discussion and thoughts - stoly - 30-11-2009 12:36
(30-11-2009 12:12 )Tintin Wrote:(30-11-2009 12:01 )sid_bridge Wrote: Yes I saw Club Paradiso last night and I thought the lighting could have been better. I also thought the camera could have given a closer shot sometimes. There were times when the girls seemed a bit distant to what they could have been.
I've said something similar to that about the camera work so has a few other members. Bob said a while ago he got new equipment for the camera so it would move around the girls instead of the camera being in 1 place but I guess it was a BS cause I haven’t seen any changes apart from a new set.
I agree Tintin, and the lighting is still something to be desired, as well as a dark studio, there are still shadows at the back of the bed. Bob take a look at 960, they have improved their set 100% take note, or I feel what Juliet said, may actually happen.
RE: Discussion and thoughts - Bob Paradiso - 30-11-2009 21:27
Chaps -
You're forgetting that our image sharpness is possibly the best, and our fancy new piece of kit has improved colours - but yes, you're all actually right with the darkness issue. My own thought originally was to go for a darker, moodier more intimate look - but that's gone down about as well as a bacon sandwich in a synagogue with you lot.
We're still not as bright as some of the other channels - which if you look, are often over lit and over-exposed. I suppose it comes down to whether one wants to be technically correct or just follow the competition. Have another look, I think we've possibly got it right now, and remember that our set itself is a dark colour (it is winter after all) but the foreground lighting, i.e on our gorgeous girls, is fine.
Anyway, we haven't even started with the newer sets and these are lighter in colour. If you want it brighter still, it's very easy to do - I just think TOO bright loses skin tone, but what does an old duffer like me know? As ever, I always welcome the feedback of our esteemed viewers..
Yours, still
Bob
RE: Discussion and thoughts - Ree's No.1 fan - 30-11-2009 23:45
Fair play Bob I think things have improved since the old dark days and it is appreciated. I'm just watching the lovely Morgan doing her thing and she certainly looks good both technically and aesthetically at the moment. She is a favourite of mine and is certainly one of the best babes on the box at the moment.
RE: Discussion and thoughts - perana68 - 01-12-2009 01:11
Bob, sorry to be critical but I think most of us "chaps" would say less about the lighting, camera work, set design etc. if the girls on your channel actually made us want to watch it.
And as you know, being a schrewd businessman and all, if we are enticed to watch we will be enticed to call.
So far I watch for 5 minutes and don't feel inclined to call at all
RE: Discussion and thoughts - Bob Paradiso - 01-12-2009 01:24
(01-12-2009 01:11 )perana68 Wrote: Bob, sorry to be critical but I think most of us "chaps" would say less about the lighting, camera work, set design etc. if the girls on your channel actually made us want to watch it.
And as you know, being a schrewd businessman and all, if we are enticed to watch we will be enticed to call.
So far I watch for 5 minutes and don't feel inclined to call at all
That's your opinion old boy and you're entitled to it. I think you'll find our girls are pretty well received around here..and anyway, I love 'em - all of 'em.
RE: Discussion and thoughts - stueyboy - 01-12-2009 01:52
Hi Bob,
I think the image sharpness is very good - this evening the lighting was excellent too. And I agree you have to be cautious about bright lighting, it can make lightly tanned skin actually appear quite pale.
Also, having a camera moving about has to be done very carefully, 'cos you wouldn't want to copy say, Elite TV, and have the camera constantly moving around, with big graphics often getting in the way - that is so irritating. With some other channels, like Elite, the camera gets in so close and moves about so much you hardly ever get to see all the girl's body in the one image.
I think fullbody shots are the best, but with the occassional zooming in or other camera movement.
Keep going Bob!!
RE: Discussion and thoughts - SirAssAlot - 01-12-2009 10:20
(01-12-2009 01:11 )perana68 Wrote: if the girls on your channel actually made us want to watch it (call it).
From the few hours I saw of Sunday nights show I got to see more of Cindy Behr's ass than i did of Morgan's last night I even rang 1s & got the same thing as always
.As for the picture quality 966 has the best I think but what's the point in good picture quality when a few of the girls wont do anything for their callers apart from showing their sides to the camera
. If that’s all the girls are going to do it should be 25p – 35p a minute instead of £1.50 cause the TVX channels show more ass than a few girls on 966 which is really disappointing cause club paradiso is & should be in a better league than TVX…
RE: Discussion and thoughts - Bob Paradiso - 01-12-2009 12:51
Hexit Wrote: bob when stan say explicite, i think he means just a little more. not full on girl on girl knuckle deep fisting and dp shots.
i think hes getting at cam angles, close ups and fake lez'bean'ism. genraly up the game a little to compete with yer competition. unless you see your competition as sportxxx, xxxwives and 960 live. honestly i thought you wanted to compete with bangbabes and babestation. if thats the case then yeah up yer game m8.
Thank you, Hexit, that is precisley what I meant.
OK chaps, point taken, simply a slight language based communication on both our parts....
Make no mistake gents, Club Paradiso's aim is titillation to the highest degree, and as I have confidently announced, over the next few weeks we are introducing all sorts of new gadgets, cameras and the like to maximise your viewing pleasure.... all I humbly ask, my esteemed friends, is that you keep old Bob in your hearts, and bear with me - Paradiso Towers is going from stregth to strength.
This is my promise to you.
Thanks, as ever chaps, for your varied comments, suggestions and words of encouragement.
Bob