+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Xtreme Filth (/forumdisplay.php?fid=335)
+---- Thread: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=61914)
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 12-09-2014 02:37
THURSDAY 11th SEPTEMBER 2014.
KIKI MINAJ & BAILEY JANE (ARIZONA FAY)
![[Image: image-B1EE_54125AB2.jpg]](https://www.tvgirlsgallery.co.uk/image-B1EE_54125AB2.jpg)
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - elgar1uk - 12-09-2014 07:54
(11-09-2014 02:58 )William H Bonney Wrote: the EPG change, which was only a short time later, meant that channel 969 became 942.
Yes Bluebird said they liked having a channel with 69 in the number, as mr mystery mentioned earlier, but it was very shortlived as it was only a month later I think that it was renumbered.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - kevin symons - 12-09-2014 08:01
(12-09-2014 02:22 )Digital Dave Wrote: What the fuck are you called? Switch TV, KKHC TV or XtremeFilth? It doesn't help that KKHC TV is nowhere to be seen on screen, yet they seem to want to use this name on social media.
KKHC is the name of the forthcoming webshow, not the TV show.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - murphdogg11 - 12-09-2014 08:10
Some really hot babes appearing on this channel but it doesn't show up well on TV. Half the screen is covered with the telephone numbers & we never seem to get low down or close up shots. This channel could be so good with very little effort.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - schvall - 12-09-2014 08:15
(10-09-2014 05:15 )bigglesworth Wrote: I'd already put the channel ahead of Storm or Xpanded, even at this early stage. With some of the names to come I would expect it to have a fair chance of succeeding.
I agree that the channel is probably better than Storm or Xpanded, although it doesn't take a very high standard of show to accomplish that. I'm afraid the Storm picture puts me off, even though they have a good lineup on there, and I've never been a fan of Xpanded. It's early days yet anyway, so we'll see how the channel develops. I'm not expecting anything special, but you never know with some of the names which are apparently coming.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - space watson - 12-09-2014 08:23
(12-09-2014 08:10 )murphdogg11 Wrote: we never seem to get low down or close up shots. This channel could be so good with very little effort.
I agree murphdogg11, the camerawork has been a bit of an amateur effort so far. But the channel has only been going 4 days, so they are still beginners at the moment. Let's see where they go from here. If they are fast learners we could see a big improevement before long.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - george lusk - 12-09-2014 08:27
(12-09-2014 08:01 )kevin symons Wrote: KKHC is the name of the forthcoming webshow, not the TV show.
Yes it stands for Krystal Kiki Hard Core.
Not to be confused with the Sky TV channel.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 12-09-2014 08:28
Whenever a new or supposedly new channel comes along, the majority of this forum members get all excited at the prospect of the chance to watch something new. Anticipation of something new and maybe different is there in lots of posts. And then when it arrives disappointment just outweighs the expectancy. Does this not tell us something? Does it not let us know how outdated these programmes really are, and that we crave for something fresh. I think it does.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - space watson - 12-09-2014 08:31
(11-09-2014 23:47 )admiral decker Wrote: The show is clearly an independent production
I think that's one statement we can all agree on, or all those who have watched the show so far anyway, as they haven't made a good job of the camerawork so far and it needs a bit of attention.
RE: XtremeFilth - General Chat & Discussion - hairbald - 12-09-2014 10:07
RA - I don't think anybody has expectations of innovative new channels; what I expect is that they are good, well produced programmes with, maybe, some new faces.
As you note there are limitations as to what you can do on the channels and the money you make so most channels will have to start small and build. You need a strong base and at least some concempt that makes people want to watch - not sure they have that at the moment