RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Robot Devil - 23-04-2019 15:32
I'm with Kerr on this. That's more a case of quantity over quality. Lots of names but very few 'game changers'.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - bigglesworth - 23-04-2019 15:47
Hannah Martin said she was finished with TV anyway, even before the OnlyFans episode. As for the rest of the list, only Valentina stands out for me, but even she gets used mainly as a camgirl at Babestation and doesn't get much TV time these days.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 23-04-2019 15:48
(23-04-2019 11:07 )KerrAvon Wrote: I see it more as setting the bar other babes SHOULD be rising to, instead of getting away with bare minimum
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttt?????
We can't have that. The viewers and punters might enjoy it.
Now go and stand in the corner and water those plants Clare never got around to .
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - thefred - 23-04-2019 16:03
No reasons left to keep this channel going. Can someone pull the plug, please?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 23-04-2019 17:23
(23-04-2019 13:21 )TheProf Wrote: (23-04-2019 11:56 )LoveUKGirls Wrote: It's very hard to understand why they are so bad... really, I can't!
Even a monkey could run this channel better than that.
They really are an hopeless case.
Let's face it, the normal standards of business conduct don't apply here. This Channel is being run by the genius / genii who thought that publishing a Lads magazine (Sixty6) would be a sure-fire winner in today's social climate!
Even I know a launching a lads mag nowadays is a non-starter, especially a high end one like sixty6 as people will go “why do i pay for a mag, when I can get similar pics or even harder pics for free”
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mysterion - 23-04-2019 17:52
(23-04-2019 17:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Even I know a launching a lads mag nowadays is a non-starter, especially a high end one like sixty6 as people will go “why do i pay for a mag, when I can get similar pics or even harder pics for free”
Going by that logic, the babe channels shouldn't exist either.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - generator60 - 23-04-2019 17:59
(23-04-2019 17:52 )mysterion Wrote: (23-04-2019 17:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Even I know a launching a lads mag nowadays is a non-starter, especially a high end one like sixty6 as people will go “why do i pay for a mag, when I can get similar pics or even harder pics for free”
Going by that logic, the babe channels shouldn't exist either.
I take it high end just means expensive?
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rob169 - 23-04-2019 18:12
(23-04-2019 10:52 )GreenMachine Wrote: Maybe then the callers should be encouraged more to 'direct' the camera all the time not just a one-off for a roam or PoV.
coming from someone who never calls i wonder how you can suggest anything
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 23-04-2019 18:17
Just comes naturally.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 23-04-2019 18:32
(23-04-2019 17:52 )mysterion Wrote: (23-04-2019 17:23 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Even I know a launching a lads mag nowadays is a non-starter, especially a high end one like sixty6 as people will go “why do i pay for a mag, when I can get similar pics or even harder pics for free”
Going by that logic, the babe channels shouldn't exist either.
They are nothing alike. Porn is not to the babeshow what free pics are to mag. You can't interact with a mag.
|