+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 02-01-2013 20:29
(02-01-2013 16:53 )StanTheMan Wrote: In other news, not that I want to come across as impatient (and I did promise to stay optimistic Re BS new license), but if the channel is planning to take advantage of this development then last night's show would suggest they're in no hurry to do so. Despite the new license, last night was 'same old shit'
Yeah my thoughts exactly. Hope they make use of it tonight!!!
S
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 02-01-2013 20:47
Well folks it's seems rather exciting times are possibly just round the corner concerning the babe channels, and what a way to start the year with the great news about Babestation. Now as we've clearly seen the Babestation executives no what they're doing, and with new babes heading there way it's only a matter of time when the producers will unleash stronger content.
Now while Babestation seems to be sitting pretty, the rest of the babe channels i.e playboy/redlight bluebird/elitetv/stormbabes/xxxpanded etc will be looking over there shoulders quite worried i would imagine seeing that Babestation are getting away with a lot more stronger content, while they all have to abide by Ofcoms rules. However i think this might force the other channel executives to force there hands to either force ofcom to change there current rules and regs, or maybe the other channels might look to find there own foreign licences to try and compete with babestation?? an interesting thought perhaps I'm only speculating.
Either way i think what ever happens in the coming months will only serve to have a positive effect on the rest of the channels and this of course is a good thing.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 02-01-2013 20:57
Reintroducing the hand thong is one thing, but whether Babestation will go further is anyone's guess at the moment. Push it too far and it'll hit their other shows where the babes already show more, which makes me think Cellcast won't be pushing things that far.
As for the other channels, I think they'll only change if they see a decrease in their revenue, whilst loyal viewers/callers will always tune in and pay to chat to their favourite babe, no matter how strong the content is. Hence the reason even the tamest channels continue to make money from people calling in.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 02-01-2013 21:30
All this talk of the 'new license', but is there any actual evidence yet that BS does indeed have a new dutch license other than 'Tiffany said', or is it all just our speculation?
I'm just asking because if last nights output was the same old same old, maybe this is all just bullshit and we are just working ourselves into a feeding frenzy for no reason
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 02-01-2013 21:37
I agree.
It's not like they are going to start standing and doing full frontal, or showing uncensored content during 2-4-1s, if they end up doing more 2-4-1s to begin with.
I really doubt it's going to be any naughtier than they are allowing it to currently be.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 02-01-2013 21:43
Its probably bollocks but I live in hope. It's all I have...
S
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 02-01-2013 21:47
I guess time will tell, i agree they probably won't go full frontal nude for the simple reason that it will render babestation x pointless, i mean lets face it would you would'nt spend a fiver if you were getting what you wanted for free of course not, however i do think they'll be a bit more 241 action and a bit more nudity involved.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 02-01-2013 22:36
(02-01-2013 21:30 )munch1917 Wrote: All this talk of the 'new license', but is there any actual evidence yet that BS does indeed have a new dutch license other than 'Tiffany said', or is it all just our speculation?
I'm just asking because if last nights output was the same old same old, maybe this is all just bullshit and we are just working ourselves into a feeding frenzy for no reason
Well as someone else has already said, it seems like a funny thing to announce if it were not true. If she'd said a throwaway comment like, "Hey guys, stay tuned cos things are set to get better in the near future" then you could, and probably should, put it down to marketing spiel, but to actively announce they have a second Dutch license without it being so, doesn't really add up.
Of course, none of this means change is guaranteed.
Incidentally, would this new license affect all the BS channels or just 906?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 02-01-2013 23:10
(02-01-2013 22:36 )StanTheMan Wrote: ...
but to actively announce they have a second Dutch license without it being so, doesn't really add up.
I haven't seen the clip of what was said, but as I understand, she said they 'have a new license' which allows them to go further than before. The dutch license was speculation from this thread to try to explain what was meant by this, but it could still have been a throw away comment said in the heat of the moment by an over enthusiastic girl trying to fill 30 seconds of mic time.
(02-01-2013 22:36 )StanTheMan Wrote: Incidentally, would this new license affect all the BS channels or just 906?
Each channel has it's own separate license, the sky channels and freeview channels all require individual licenses. So if there is a new license, it would only be applicable to one channel. Of course, if it is true, then they could have replaced all their ofcom licenses. We just don't know
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Don Tingley - 02-01-2013 23:17
Not trying to get involved in the discussion, I don't really give a shit, but this is what Tiffany said: