+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 03-01-2013 01:38
(03-01-2013 01:05 )StanTheMan Wrote: But I thought freeview were on an Ofcom license, which the theory suggests is why BS1 haven't been able to take advantage of their Dutch license - because of the duel broadcast?
Ooh, my head's starting to hurt now.
One of their Freeview channels has a Dutch licence (forgotten which one but mr mystery can no doubt fill us in) which they use to broadcast from 9 or 10 pm. The Ofcom Freeview channels can only start after midnight. It was this that Ofcom complained to the Dutch authorities about and got nowhere.For some unknown reason Cellcast have so far not mirrored Sky 906 (Dutch) with their existing Dutch Freeview channel, instead using an Ofcom-regulated Freeview channel.
As I write this post I'm realising that in fact Cellcast are a bunch of idiots and having an additional Dutch licence on Freeview probably won't amount to a hill of beans. Why are they even bothering?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 03-01-2013 03:50
Cellcast are certainly an odd bunch, that's why we'll probably only see how much you can really get away if another babe channel ends up getting a Dutch licence.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 03-01-2013 04:30
Does anyone else recall how bs used to run its channels some years ago i remember there were seperate shows for freeview and sky,then they merged and the shows on sky were toned down to comply with freeview regs,perhaps the only reason for the new license is to standardise the output,bearing in mind since the announcement apart from the 241 the other night content has not dramatically altered apart from an ad showing Cherri topless on Tuesday night just after 9pm.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 03-01-2013 12:49
(03-01-2013 01:38 )Digital Dave Wrote:(03-01-2013 01:05 )StanTheMan Wrote: But I thought freeview were on an Ofcom license, which the theory suggests is why BS1 haven't been able to take advantage of their Dutch license - because of the duel broadcast?
Ooh, my head's starting to hurt now.
For some unknown reason Cellcast have so far not mirrored Sky 906 (Dutch) with their existing Dutch Freeview channel, instead using an Ofcom-regulated Freeview channel.
As I write this post I'm realising that in fact Cellcast are a bunch of idiots and having an additional Dutch licence on Freeview probably won't amount to a hill of beans. Why are they even bothering?
Until now i believe these are the BS channels on freeview with a Dutch license
Freeview Ch 174, is Dutch licensed, it starts at 11pm, (a hour before Ofcom rules allow babe channels to broadcast on freeview) and is used to broadcast BSX the encrypted channel after 11.30pm, but between the hours of 11pm to 11.30 pm it shows the same feed as Sky Ch 906 that is also Dutch regulated , they use this 30 min section that is non Ofcom regulated to mainly promote BSX telling people to press the red button on this channel. etc
Freeview Ch 173 is also Dutch licensed and starts at 10pm (2 hours before Ofcom allow babe channels on freeview to broadcast) it shows the same feed as Sky channel 909, 909 is Ofcom licensed .
You can tell which channels on freeview are Dutch licensed because they usually start before 12am .
Until now freeview channel 172 that starts at 12am and finishes at 5am was thought to have a Ofcom licence and shows the same feed as Sky channel 906 that is Dutch licensed, Sky 906 and freeview 172 is the channel that Tiffany announced had got a new licence, she didn't give any more details other than the girls can now touch and lick when doing 2-4-1's .
Also they have quite clearly emphasised on the mic on these 2 channels that the hand thong can be used again, Lori was on the mic talking to either Megan or Geri and telling her to look what i can do again and demonstrated the hand thong technique, as we know the girls under Ofcom rules can use the hand to cover themselves but cannot touch their lady bits while doing so or be seen to be rubbing or applying pressure etc , Lori is clearly touching and applying pressure and doing what Ofcom don't allow and has even boasted about what she can now do on the mic, this along with what Tiffany said seems to me to indicate that they have definitely got some type of new licence and probably a Dutch one for freeview Ch 172 .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 03-01-2013 17:39
Thanks for the clarification Mr M. I was getting quite lost!!!
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 04-01-2013 13:53
So. Nothing much special happened with the new license then!!!
Boring... Maybe it was all hot air after all!
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 04-01-2013 16:37
Let's be honest here, with the selection of models that Babestation had last night we were never ever going to see the limits being pushed that much.
Incidently I fell asleep on the couch as soon as I got home after having been up since half four in the morning for work. Woke up at the back of 2, watched the shows for a few hours before going to my bed. Looks like I missed fuck all.
Last night they could have had rules as explicit as Sexysat TV only for it to yield no results. A tame model will always be tame irespective of what the rules and regulations are.
Tame shows followed by more explicit ones have always been the case even before ofcom started to put their foot down. This is also the case in the rest of Europe who don't have miserable censors like we do here in the UK.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 05-01-2013 10:21
So, was the new license used to good effect last night?
I didn't watch as I'm so despondent with the whole scene at present...
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 05-01-2013 15:45
(05-01-2013 10:21 )shylok Wrote: So, was the new license used to good effect last night?could not see much diffrence personally.
I didn't watch as I'm so despondent with the whole scene at present...
Shylok
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 05-01-2013 18:36
Camilla was great, but like others have said, there is no difference. They've done every type of handthong in the past, as well as in early and mid last year, so there's nothing new.
Unless they actually show uncensored full frontal, or get really naughty during nude 2-4-1s, nothing is new.