+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 06-01-2013 17:23
(06-01-2013 17:17 )StanTheMan Wrote:(06-01-2013 16:06 )mrmann Wrote: Babestation gets more leniency, so that's just tough luck for the other channels.
Does it? Show me the evidence.
Handthong is evidence. Are we talking days here?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 06-01-2013 17:27
Days or nights. The handthong comes and goes on all the channels, and I don't think there's anything in Ofcom's regs to say it's not allowed anyway.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 06-01-2013 17:40
^^The girls can only use a hand to cover/shield themselves when naked but not touch, rub, put pressure on their genitals, Storm were found in breach last year for a girl using the hand thong and making contact while doing so, Elite were also found in breach a few times for girls using the hand thong and touching themselves while doing so as was RLC. No channel at the present is doing what BS is doing when the girls are using the hand thong , ie full hand contact while they are spread legged naked facing the camera, it's been done before but no channel is doing it now other than BS on Sky 906 and freeview 172 , when it's been done before on non BS channels Ofcom usually ended up getting involved .
Check out the rules posted by chilly
(21-12-2012 03:00 )Chilly Wrote: Here's the list:
![[Image: captureptj.jpg]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/341/captureptj.jpg/)
The bit at the bottom of Ofcom's rules about what 2 girls can do when on screen together is of interest as well as what Tiffany said they can now do with the new licence when doing 2-4-1's differs from Ofcom's rules . Tiffany said with the new licence they can now touch and lick the other girl, if i remember right she then went on to suck Lori's nipple .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 06-01-2013 18:20
Come tomorrow, If you were to read on Ofcoms website that they are going to relax their rules on the babestations. what effect do you think it would make. Do you think that it would open the floodgates and allow the girls to really entertain us, or do you think that the channels would keep a lid on it? I would bet my bottom dollar that it would be the latter. After all what have the babechannels got to gain by unleashing the girls flashing talents. As long as the punters keep phoning, and the money keeps coming in, why should they have it any different. You have to remember these TV companies, and the models for that matter don't do it for the sake of someone having a "J Arthur" in a darkened bedroom as the milkman delivers his gold top. They do it for their profits, nothing more, nothing less. So my way of thinking is this, gone are the days when you get a free show like we have in the past. Any future pussie flashing will come at a price, you can bet on that. Fans of the babechannels put it down to Ofcom for spoiling their entertainment, but the babechannels have not busted a gut to get these archaic censorship rules changed. If anything they have added to them, just take those OSGs as an example.As I have said many times, Ofcom rules are not set in stone they can be challenged. But whilst the calls keep coming they may as well be carved in the hardest of granite.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shano123 - 06-01-2013 18:30
It's true the babechannels can have atleast have a go at challenging the ofcom rules but they don't wana risk anything plus considering the money they make why not have one channel encrypted? They can't come out and say sky charges too much because they can afford it or atleast try for a short period to see how it does.
We all say the same things in terms of how tame and boring the shows are but it it just looks like the people running the shows don't care about the fans because surely going encrypted is the best thing to do So why not just try it out?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - lucent-x - 06-01-2013 18:32
re. the last two points on the list about language.
I happened to catch part of the 10 minute TVX promo on Freeview the other night and it was full of sexually explicit language (not to mention actual sexual activity itself), which I'm sure wasn't always the case. Are there different rules to cover this broadcast?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 06-01-2013 18:34
(06-01-2013 17:27 )StanTheMan Wrote: Days or nights. The handthong comes and goes on all the channels, and I don't think there's anything in Ofcom's regs to say it's not allowed anyway.
Just remembered Chilly posting this info as well concerning the hand thong .
(15-10-2012 15:49 )Chilly Wrote: [
Ofcom's regulation of the babe channels tells you all you need to know, which means they'd more than likely view it (hand thong) as being 'sex material'. The channels probably know it's not worth bothering with now.
![[Image: Capturenew.jpg]](http://s10.postimage.org/e8sddihbd/Capturenew.jpg)
Ofcom don't regard the babe channels as adult sex material , so it's not allowed on the babe channels, they regard the channels as teleshopping services and licence them accordingly .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 06-01-2013 18:41
(06-01-2013 17:40 )mr mystery Wrote: No channel at the present is doing what BS is doing when the girls are using the hand thong , ie full hand contact while they are spread legged naked facing the camera[...]
So that's it, is it? Handthongs... that's what this all-mighty Dutch license is allowing them to do?
Whoop-de-fucking-woo! Power to the people!! Put down your arms, Comrades, the fight is over. Ofcom and their dictatorship has fallen, and we couldn't have done it without Babestation!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 06-01-2013 18:43
^^^^ don't forget the licking and touching lol
RE: Ofcom Discussion - TheWatcher - 06-01-2013 20:10
(06-01-2013 18:32 )lucent-x Wrote: re. the last two points on the list about language.
I happened to catch part of the 10 minute TVX promo on Freeview the other night and it was full of sexually explicit language (not to mention actual sexual activity itself), which I'm sure wasn't always the case. Are there different rules to cover this broadcast?
I don't think the preview is much different now from what it used to be. They did move the start time of the preview from 11pm to midnight just over a year ago, perhaps due to ofcom. The preview might have slightly different rules since none of it is live now, just recordings.
For anyone who has not seen them (hidden away in an "archive" section of the forum), I re-uploaded 2 vids last year http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=46220&pid=1050526#pid1050526