+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shylok - 07-01-2013 19:21
(07-01-2013 19:11 )Rob169 Wrote:(06-01-2013 17:16 )StanTheMan Wrote:(06-01-2013 11:12 )Rob169 Wrote: i see a couple of thismornigs studio66 girls were complaining on twitter about how a rival channel were getting away with slutty nurse outfit, stockings and crotch shotstry sticking 2 fingers up at ofcom for a start and taking them on
I presume they were talking about crotch shots during the day? If so, I'd like to know where, cos I ain't seen any.
just writing what was tweetedbut i did see a couple of knicker flashes from Ani james so that might've been it
No good complaining! As Stan says the lazy cows should get of their arse's and DO something about it!! How about coming on here and supporting us lot for a fucking start! Moaning bitches...
RE: Ofcom Discussion - oklahoma001 - 07-01-2013 19:44
Ofcom's latest bulletin.
No investigations but someone has a vendetta against Chatgirl.
![[Image: image-B42A_50EB24D4.jpg]](https://www.tvgirlsgallery.co.uk/image-B42A_50EB24D4.jpg)
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 07-01-2013 20:09
^^ How in fuck's name did xxxXpanded make that list?
(07-01-2013 19:11 )Rob169 Wrote: just writing what was tweeted
Well clearly another one who's talking through her fanny then. There isn't any dayshow offering crotch shots to my knowledge.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 07-01-2013 22:14
(07-01-2013 19:44 )oklahoma001 Wrote: No investigations but someone has a vendetta against Chatgirl.
Indeed, and it's been going on for the last couple of months.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 07-01-2013 22:41
Thanks to oklahoma001 for that. December and August are always strange times for regulators, viewers and complainers.
11 complaints against ChatGirl but just 3 against all other babe channels combined? Clearly part of a targetted harassment campaign. If someone did this on Twitter it would be possible to take out an injuction against them.
On the plus side Twatcom rejected 14 complaints against babe channels (Chatgirl 11, Studio66 (night) 1, Studio66 (day) 1, Xxxxxxxxpanded 1). The complaint categories ranged from "Sexual material" (11), "Participation TV - Harm" (the usual adult category, just once), "Generally Accepted Standards" (once) and "Participation TV - Protection of under 18s" (once, suggest daytime material). Why the different categories? Covers 27 Nov to 17 Dec.
Other rejected sex related and discrimination complaints against 4thought.tv, A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex (sexual orientation, not sex as such), Any Answers on Radio 4, BBC News At One, Radio Exe, Brainiac: Science Abuse, Celebrity Who Wants to be a Millionaire?, Lemon La Vida Loca, Misfits, New Girl, Phones 4U's sponsorship credit, Rules of Engagement, Kiss FM, Peace FM, The Dirty Dozen, The Radio 1 Breakfast Show with Nick Grimshaw and You've Been Framed!
Some of these I can understand but others show just how touchy and pettey some people are. I wish Ofcom consistently threw out petty complaints about babe channels too instead of launching investigations half the time and throwing the book at channels for minor transgressions.
12 full investigations listed, but no adult shows among them. Only covers 6-19 Dec, so the Christmas/New Year list wont be out for a few weeks.
Meanwhile Ofcom has made itself popular by finding that a 12a film that had been cut further by the broadcaster (X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Channel 4) was unsuitable for broadcast before the watershed. The violent bit was at 8:40pm.
Leeds TV broadcast the word "Fuck" at 6:30pm. Ofcom says this is among the worst language possible, broadcasting it at kids tea time is about as bad as it gets. If a babe channel had a nipple flash at that time they would be fined or worse. Leeds TV gets a mild telling off.
National Geographic Channel broadcast a trailer at 4:30pm for their Sex season, making repeated references to sex, sex slaves, rape and teen sex. Not ideal teatime viewing, and parents do encourage kids to watch documentary channels. NGC didnt even get a telling off, the complaint was Resolved.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 07-01-2013 23:03
A National Geographic Sex Season
RE: Ofcom Discussion - schmoo - 07-01-2013 23:11
With all this clear targeting of "incidents" being reported to Ofcom and then them dishing out their own punishment, clearly impartially in respect of other breaches across TV (as per eccles' post above, for example), but should the (fkn screaming with disbelief laughter i'm actually posting this!!) the channel bosses have ever thought about challening this type of Ofcom behaviour, the word "vexatious" is used mega favourably by the legal profession when it's clear someone/some body is on the receiving end.
Just a thought.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 07-01-2013 23:37
The channels bring it on themselves. Stupidity is their lifeblood.
They grass each other up, the reason being that they know that each and every 'complaint', no matter what the source, will be investigated. Nearly every complaint made against the babe channels is vexatious (i.e. a rival channel), but that seems to cut no ice in Ofcom land. Ofcom needs to change their methods and stop wasting public money on following up such complaints.
I agree with the comments above that Chatgirl TV is being targeted. I think it was in the previous month that they received 14 complaints in one day, which must be a record! Luckily Ofcom decided not to proceed further after an initial investigation.
Why would people be targeting Chatgirl TV? It's a pretty dumb strategy to go after the most boring and bland channel in the 900s, apart from XXXpanded, which also received a complaint! Very odd.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 07-01-2013 23:41
(07-01-2013 23:03 )StanTheMan Wrote: A National Geographic Sex Season
If you read the typically erotic Ofcom report on the incident it seems almost worth signing up to National Geographic to see the shows!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - schmoo - 08-01-2013 12:31
(07-01-2013 23:37 )Digital Dave Wrote: The channels bring it on themselves. Stupidity is their lifeblood.
They grass each other up, the reason being that they know that each and every 'complaint', no matter what the source, will be investigated. Nearly every complaint made against the babe channels is vexatious (i.e. a rival channel),
~~~~~
Quite right Dave. Which is why half of me really wants to see the channels go under.
Also, re my/your "vexatious" comment, i meant to suggest that it also works the other way too - by that, i mean Ofcom are "vexatiously" targeting the channels in respect of breaches and punishments etc.