(23-08-2016 23:19 )M-L-L Wrote:  I like pussy as much as the next guy, but I guess purely semantically, the cams could be described as "pervy" to the extent that for a lot of the time I'm guessing all they offer is a single continuous static close up shot of one area of the babes' body, ie. wherever the cam happens to be pointing at, presumably the crotch but not always (in my limited experience of using it ! ) so such a "restricted" view without any other context could be argued to be reasonably pervy - at least on TV with a reasonable cameraman you get a bit of an idea of what the rest of the babe looks like - even in close up they can actually pan the camera.
Unless the babe has the pervcam in her hand and is waving it about up and down herself, which I think we would notice on the TV so let's it face it noone has been brave/imaginative/stupid enough to do that, then basically you are logging on to see continuous static footage of a fairly motionless crotch in the same position ? After a minute or so, that's probably almost as dull as seeing the TV version of a motionless top-half from the shoulders up only shot of a babe sitting with a camera looking up her snatch supposedly (but not really ? playing with herself ?
If the babe's actually moving at all then I imagine (again from limited previous experience) what you are seeing is a blurred pixellated-to-buggery image which might as well have a big fat babestation badge all over it for all that you can actually see.