The UK Babe Channels Forum
Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312)
+----- Thread: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18868)



RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - WelshMichael - 31-10-2018 19:37

(31-10-2018 18:59 )teewee Wrote:  
(31-10-2018 17:37 )Robot Devil Wrote:  Don't worry you sappy sods - she'll be back by Christmas, I bet.

I`ll take that bet,any price you like

I think you're right - January is my bet Big Grin


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - RutgerWhore - 01-11-2018 07:16

She obviously didn't want to go. I don't think any of them did. But S66 put that demand on them and they backed themselves. I can see where S66 was coming from, but they've destroyed their roster and I'm not sure the girls are as interchangeable as some think.


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - geoffh - 03-11-2018 09:23

(01-11-2018 07:16 )RutgerWhore Wrote:  She obviously didn't want to go. I don't think any of them did. But S66 put that demand on them and they backed themselves. I can see where S66 was coming from, but they've destroyed their roster and I'm not sure the girls are as interchangeable as some think.

I wouldn't be surprised if S66 just use this decision to reduce the wage bill anyway


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 03-11-2018 11:10

i love how your all jumping on s66...
they didnt start an only fans page where the girls would sell exclusive content to s66 customers, without giving s66 there cut.
they were also showing pussy to get only fans yet refused to do the same and thus not bring in as much for s66... there employer.

the girls did this to s66 not s66 doing it to the girls.
its the girls who set themselves up as direct competition to the channel. its the girls who were taking business directly off s66 by telling s66 customers not to sign up to the site as it was the hub of a credit card scam run by the credit service provider and rampant/firestom??? (sic)

yeah in this s66 are the victim here. and while it pains me to say it. they have acted correctly by asking for a tax or asking the girls to leave.
i wish it wasnt true but yeah not s66's fault, at least not in the way you all seem to be laying the blame...


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - teewee - 03-11-2018 11:14

Don`t disagree with you,but not sure why this seems to being discussed in Becky`s thread? Surely should be in the main S66 and onlyfans thread?


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - Lynx - 03-11-2018 11:17

(03-11-2018 11:10 )HEX!T Wrote:  i love how your all jumping on s66...
they didnt start an only fans page where the girls would sell exclusive content to s66 customers, without giving s66 there cut.
they were also showing pussy to get only fans yet refused to do the same and thus not bring in as much for s66... there employer.

the girls did this to s66 not s66 doing it to the girls.
its the girls who set themselves up as direct competition to the channel. its the girls who were taking business directly off s66 by telling s66 customers not to sign up to the site as it was the hub of a credit card scam run by the credit service provider and rampant/firestom??? (sic)

yeah in this s66 are the victim here. and while it pains me to say it. they have acted correctly by asking for a tax or asking the girls to leave.
i wish it wasnt true but yeah not s66's fault, at least not in the way you all seem to be laying the blame...

Have to agree here....

This is a business at the end of the day. We don't know the figures here, but perhaps S66 started losing money because no one was calling in or signing up to there website because instead people were joining the girls OF pages instead? I know I wouldn't be happy to be paying someone good money to steal customers from my company (if i had one Big Laugh )


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - WelshMichael - 03-11-2018 11:17

(03-11-2018 11:10 )HEX!T Wrote:  i love how your all jumping on s66...
they didnt start an only fans page where the girls would sell exclusive content to s66 customers, without giving s66 there cut.
they were also showing pussy to get only fans yet refused to do the same and thus not bring in as much for s66... there employer.

the girls did this to s66 not s66 doing it to the girls.
its the girls who set themselves up as direct competition to the channel. its the girls who were taking business directly off s66 by telling s66 customers not to sign up to the site as it was the hub of a credit card scam run by the credit service provider and rampant/firestom??? (sic)

yeah in this s66 are the victim here. and while it pains me to say it. they have acted correctly by asking for a tax or asking the girls to leave.
i wish it wasnt true but yeah not s66's fault, at least not in the way you all seem to be laying the blame...

Why should S66 get a cut though, unless it was S66 content they were selling? The road S66 has gone down seems like a sledgehammer to crack a walnut approach to me. Surely they could have reached a compromise on the issue i.e. don't promote onlyfans when you're on TV or also promote S66 on onlyfans, work to similar levels on both platforms etc.


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 03-11-2018 11:29

Q: why should they get a cut?

A: because they were selling to s66 customers.
its not rocket science.

as for there way of solving it...
again are you sure its s66 who swung the hammer?.
because im pretty sure they had zero intention of loosing 10 or so girls off there roster in a week.


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 03-11-2018 11:31

@teewee its fine mate all these threads will be closed soon anyway and as im talking about becky in a becky chat thread... no real reason to move it. (imo)


RE: Becky Roberts - Chat & Discussion - WelshMichael - 03-11-2018 11:35

You're right I've no idea who did what like most here I'm looking in from the outside. However, if the content they sell doesn't belong to S66 and they are not selling their own content when they are working for S66 (i.e. on screen or on cam) I don't see how S66 can expect a cut of what they earn. Unless whatever contract they sign to work there has some kind of clause preventing it. Anyway long term I think S66 are in the stronger position and will fill the gaps on their schedule quite easily.