+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 17-01-2013 19:31
(17-01-2013 18:28 )Digital Dave Wrote: ^^^ What a joke! It seems that the main enemy of the babe channels at the moment is not Ofcom, it's the jumped up little twerp running S66.what chance of the channels making any progress when things like this happen within the industry , i hope tit for tat doesnt start between them it could cause even more sanctions being put in place , stupid fuckers
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 17-01-2013 21:35
(17-01-2013 19:31 )shankey! Wrote:(17-01-2013 18:28 )Digital Dave Wrote: ^^^ What a joke! It seems that the main enemy of the babe channels at the moment is not Ofcom, it's the jumped up little twerp running S66.what chance of the channels making any progress when things like this happen within the industry , i hope tit for tat doesnt start between them it could cause even more sanctions being put in place , stupid fuckers
Erm, that's already been going on for ages, and it'll continue.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-01-2013 21:43
So this tit for tat goes on, when will the channels learn and in particular Studio66 who have been victim to ofcom hassle's before. Why and what does any channel have to gain out of all this. RLC will probably go oh well fuck you Studio 66, we'll get our revenge out on you. It's fucking pathetic, I hate a snitch.
Whatever happened to the days of well we'd better up our game, anything they can do, we can do better rather than going down this sucidal path.
Also why can't a model put on a sexy outfit during the day, I'd be very interested to know why ofcom deem it such a problem. Repeats of Baywatch are being shown during the day on one of the mainstream channels which is far more titillating than anything the dayshows have to offer.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - schmoo - 17-01-2013 22:19
Yes it is pathetic and ultimately why the end of the dayshows are just around the corner i'm afraid.
Ofcom are hell bent on enforcing the minority mindset that is the "sexualisation of children", which is a fkn myth in any case. Unfortunately, these channels, in the daytime for certain presently, are deemed a major threat to this.
It's just one, of many, ridiculous panderings this country bows down to the minority about (so called human fkn rights from those non-indigenous people of this country is the other major thing going on that really fkn annoys me too).
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 17-01-2013 22:29
There are some good points there. 20 years unrestricted access to internet porn, and no explosion in sexual offences or disturbed children. It really would help if people responded to Ofcoms consultation on its annual plan - closing date is 5pm 22 Feb. I will be saying that Ofcom should regulate genuine offence and harm, rather than being a willing tool in trade disputes and anti competitive behaviour. That is not in the public interest or what Parliament set them up for. There are more important issues they concentrate their scarce resources on. It would not hurt to copy brief, polite responses to the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/draft-annual-plan-2013-14/
http://www.parliament.uk/cmscom
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 17-01-2013 22:47
(17-01-2013 21:43 )Scottishbloke Wrote: So this tit for tat goes on, when will the channels learn and in particular Studio66 who have been victim to ofcom hassle's before. Why and what does any channel have to gain out of all this. RLC will probably go oh well fuck you Studio 66, we'll get our revenge out on you. It's fucking pathetic, I hate a snitch.
Whatever happened to the days of well we'd better up our game, anything they can do, we can do better rather than going down this sucidal path.
Also why can't a model put on a sexy outfit during the day, I'd be very interested to know why ofcom deem it such a problem. Repeats of Baywatch are being shown during the day on one of the mainstream channels which is far more titillating than anything the dayshows have to offer.
I'd never complain about any channel (Not about the nudity or sexual content), or encourage anyone to, but many of us have evidence saved that could get these channels fined by Ofcom. Any producer that is snitching on someone else, is risking have some angry person here complain about them because of their snitching, and use their recordings to prove when intentional slips have been allowed, or other moments.
The producers should use better judgement and stop fighting with one another, despite ripe competition!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-01-2013 23:04
I think it's high time all the channel execs all got together and called for a ceasefire and to end this ridiculas competitive war that has been going on for years. With ofcom present it's a very dangerous game they are going down with this snitch mob mentality.
The reason Bangbabes TV had their licence revoked at the start of 2011 was down to these very tactics. Sure if RLC were to suffer the same fate then yes Studio 66 would have a surge in calls greater than it is at present, let's not bullshit about it. But then it would just be a waiting game before they then became the next ofcom victims.
Also on the note of even regulating these channels, why, for what purpose. They are supposed to be titillating, they were designed to be titillating, the clue is in the name. They are wank channels, sexline channels, whatever name you want to call them, they have no plot or storyline whatsoever to them.
People watch them and for one reason alone, how ofcom can even be bothered to regulate them in the first place is beyond me. So long as all the models are legal and have consented to doing this type of entertainment then that ticks all the boxes.
The channels are kept well apart from the mainstream channels. If it's not your cup of tea then don't watch them and don't fucking bitch about them either. I'm fucking pissed off with the amount of nonsense that has burdoned this type of entertainment since day 1.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Chilly - 17-01-2013 23:12
(17-01-2013 23:04 )Scottishbloke Wrote: I think it's high time all the channel execs all got together and called for a ceasefire and to end this ridiculas competitive war that has been going on for years. With ofcom present it's a very dangerous game they are going down with this snitch mob mentality.
That would be the common sense thing to do, but it isn't going to happen. They simply don't see the bigger picture, so the tit-for-tat war will continue until they've all gone out of business. Sadly, it's just the way it is.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 17-01-2013 23:19
Every complaint about a channel strengthens Ofcoms position against ALL channels. It enables Ofcom to state there have been so many complaints about adult channels in the past year/month and use that as a justification. We know they conveniently forget to say those complaints are not from the public.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 18-01-2013 00:00
Weekly Audience Complaints Report
Report covers complaints received between:
Tuesday, 8 January, 2013 to Monday, 14 January, 2013
Celebrity Big Brother Saturday, 12 January, 2013
- Channel 5: 103
Dancing on Ice -Sunday, 13 January, 2013 ITV1 London: 11
Lilla Årskrönik Monday, 17 December, 2012 - Kanal 5: 12
True Stories: Gypsy Blood Thursday, 10 January, 2013 - Channel 4: 34
3 of these relate to broadcasts during the reporting period. Interestingly the Kanal 5 ones refer to a show broadcast a month earlier. (Kanal 5)