Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 09-02-2013 22:16 Wasnt part of the problem with Bangbabes that whoever was running it kept on breaking the rules even after Ofcom found against them, did not defend themselves when investigated by Ofcom and failed to supply recordings? Its one thing to challenge Ofcom, another to ignore them and hope they go away. RLC having some staff and facilities in common with Bangbabes does not mean one is the other under a different name - a lot hinges on management. Quote:ResponseBulletin 168 25/10/2010 RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 09-02-2013 23:19 (09-02-2013 22:16 )eccles Wrote: RLC having some staff and facilities in common with Bangbabes does not mean one is the other under a different name - a lot hinges on management. Phil Barry is the managing director of RLC/Playboy TV chat, to my knowledge he wasn't a manager of Bangbabes, but RLC was part owned/run by Bangmedia at the time Bangbabes went bust, Cathy Barry made a post on here somewhere stating that RLC was in partnership with Bangmedia or something like that, so from what i can gather when Bangmedia went bust RLC then became independent and carried on on their own, they took over the remaining Bangmedia channels and took on some of their staff, RLC is not Bangmedia under another name, but they were in association with them as stated on TV and by Cathy, RLC just grew more from the ashes of Bangbabes, RLC even used to broadcast a program called Bangbabes after 12am every night month's after Bangmedia went bust, this was not just a carry on in the program guide from when Bangbabes were using the channels, it was put in the program info guide after Bangmedia stopped broadcasting . RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 10-02-2013 12:27 ^^^ In reference to my above post concerning the relation ship between RLC and Bangbabes and what Cathy said about it i have just found this post of hers replying to a post asking if she will still be on Bangbabes . (04-10-2010 21:54 )cathybarry Wrote: yes of coarse i am all my friends are at bang babes I thought i'd find the post of Cathy's just in case i'd got it wrong and didn't want the RLC rep having a go at me for posting speculation again lol . So to me it looks like not only have RLC inherited some Bangbabes staff and Channels etc, they have also inherited the malicious complaints made by the same rival channel boss and girls that helped in the demise of Bangbabes . RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 10-02-2013 16:47 To me this is utterly ridicules childish behaviour, if RLC other rival channels can't do what this channels does, then what happens they throw there toys out the pram, and start complaining to Ofcom the trouble is that when they do this they are giving Ofcom ammunition to put more pressure on the channels, this is bloody stupid Anyway moving on from this, I personally believe that when Ofcom goes I think that the old ways will return, in otherwords the kind of adult entertainment we had say 3-4 yrs ago. We must remember that the reason we've lost the majority of our channels is down to Ofcom, and if the ITC were still in charge I do believe things would have stayed the same. Nevertheless as it's been mentioned the babe channels have not helped themselves, the main cause is that they never confronted Ofcom when they had the chance I do believe that the babes themselves are pissed of with all the antiquated rules and regulations, and I think the producers have had enough to!! Question will the producers rock the boat? Probably not, maybe they're just biding there time waiting for Ofcom to depart, and hope the new regulators will be more tolerant, maybe the channels have insider news that we're not privy to? Who knows. I think all we can do is to wait and see how 2013 unfolds, that's pretty much all we can do. RE: Ofcom Discussion - RCTV - 10-02-2013 20:08 Bang Media Ltd is still active as is Red Light Central Ltd. which started in 2011. They could of very easily started up a new company after purchasing assets from Bang Media Ltd and offered some staff contracts with them. RE: Ofcom Discussion - admiral decker - 10-02-2013 20:35 (09-02-2013 23:19 )mr mystery Wrote: they took over the remaining Bangmedia channels There were no remaining Bangmedia channels, unless you mean the ones they were renting from Playboy. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 10-02-2013 21:24 (10-02-2013 20:08 )RCTV Wrote: Bang Media Ltd is still active as is Red Light Central Ltd. which started in 2011. They could of very easily started up a new company after purchasing assets from Bang Media Ltd and offered some staff contracts with them. If they are still active they have to be careful as Bang are persona non grata at Ofcom and they can declare people involved in decision making to be not "fit and proper" to run a channel. Camera crew should be OK but it could extend to producers, directors, compliance officers and senior decision makers, not just the licence owner. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 10-02-2013 21:34 (10-02-2013 20:08 )RCTV Wrote: Bang Media Ltd is still active as is Red Light Central Ltd. which started in 2011. They could of very easily started up a new company after purchasing assets from Bang Media Ltd and offered some staff contracts with them. Bang Media Ltd is still active (iv'e just checked) but Bang Media (London) Ltd is in liquidation (iv'e just checked), from what i can gather there was three Bang Company's , Bang Media Ltd, Bang Media (London) Ltd and Bang Channels Ltd , it was actually Bang Channels Ltd that were issued a winding up order when they couldn't or wouldn't pay the Ofcom fines (i think) (10-02-2013 20:35 )admiral decker Wrote:(09-02-2013 23:19 )mr mystery Wrote: they took over the remaining Bangmedia channels Yes i meant they took over the remaining channels Bang Babes were broadcasting from that Playboy was the licence holder of, obviously Bang Babes were not using their own channels/Licence at that time because Ofcom had already revoked their licence and they had been removed from the Sky EPG some time before this . RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 10-02-2013 22:32 (10-02-2013 21:34 )mr mystery Wrote: Bang Media Ltd is still active (iv'e just checked) but Bang Media (London) Ltd is in liquidation (iv'e just checked), from what i can gather there was three Bang Company's , Bang Media Ltd, Bang Media (London) Ltd and Bang Channels Ltd , it was actually Bang Channels Ltd that were issued a winding up order when they couldn't or wouldn't pay the Ofcom fines (i think) That's right. It was Bang Channels Ltd but also Bang Media (London) Ltd. The latter held the Freeview licence. This is the link to Ofcom's judgment on the matter: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/content-sanctions-adjudications/bangmedia-revocation.pdf Quote: Bang Channels Ltd holds three TLCS licences: TLCS-933 (Tease Me), TLCS-1015, (Tease Me 2) and TLCS-1231 (Tease Me 3). Bang Media (London) Ltd holds one DTPS licence: DTPS-078 (Tease Me TV) (the four licences referred to collectively as “the licences”, and Bang Channels Ltd and Bang Media (London) Ltd referred to collectively as “the Licensees”). The Licensees are under common control, and have the same directors and compliance team. Bang Media Ltd is totally unconnected with Bang Babes and is in a completely different area of business. As you said previously mr mystery, it was the channels that were licensed through Playboy TV that remained on air for a short time and were then taken over by Phil Barry, becoming re-branded as Red Light. So I agree with your premise that RLC is the successor to Bang Babes. All the RLC music is Bang Babes music (about time they changed it really!). RE: Ofcom Discussion - winsaw - 11-02-2013 13:10 RLC and bang are not and have never been the same companies, bang help pumpkin films set up a tv channel(RLC) as they were not competition at the time so the channels had a very good relationship which is what Cathy is on about, when Bang went bust RLC were in the right place at the right time to use their long standing and good relationship with playboy to take on the channels that were now free, they also signed a lot of the girls and production staff up who were out of work and re-branded the channel away from the bbw 40+ market to the main stream channel we see today, |