+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 DAYTIME GENERAL FORUM (/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+----- Thread: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=8090)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 12-03-2018 06:32
the goings on At St66 are enough to make a man turn to drink!!
I would say Shandy mate any hope of new talent making the daytime babes watchable again on St66 are getting to the point where it seems the established babes are even starting to make the move into the management side of things bye putting the restrictions on new babes and ensuring their own callers keep them happy and I would not be surprised if it has reached the point where they accuse their regular callers of cheating on them by simply calling anyone different or new
I agree Heather (and possibly even Kylie) are the two best new faces St66 have introduced for a long time and Heather does possess the qualities to even take over Fernanda's place when she decides to step away from the TV screens. St66 have had the perfect opportunity to give Heather the same kind of free reign Fernanda has on TV and they simply blew it big time.
I imagine we could see Heather walking out of St66 and going to either BS or XP before the end of the year and leaving St66 wondering why she left when they missed an opportunity to unleash a bright diamond performer.
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Chrisst - 13-03-2018 05:47
A couple of points from me guys.
Firstly this exchange I noticed:
![[Image: image-1EA1_5AA75E9E.jpg]](https://www.tvgirlsgallery.co.uk/image-1EA1_5AA75E9E.jpg)
Interesting that 'Mr. Gallery' implied frustration with Ofcom's requirements, I surmise that other than 'official' warnings about content there is a process in place where Ofcom complain about what has been broadcast, that that has occurred recently (or is ongoing) and concerns 'slips'.
Secondly I'm intrigued by the two previous comments above that there is in place at Studio 66 a 'development program':
1. That a presenters performance is considered to be art(by anyone other than us).
2. That her performance is considered to have a bearing on the quality of interaction with callers or the amount of money she earns for the station.
3. That one presenter is allowed a greater degree of freedom of expression than another.
4. That a presenter (one in particular) might leave and somehow be seen as leaving a void. (By anyone other than us).
5.That a new presenter might be seen to fill that void (or partially).
6.'Move into the management'.
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 13-03-2018 07:11
very interesting
[split] Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 13-03-2018 09:43
![[Image: image-5A11_5AA79D12.jpg]](https://www.tvgirlsgallery.co.uk/image-5A11_5AA79D12.jpg)
Hmm someone's clearly not happy with their cam & credit service!!
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - DuggyG2 - 13-03-2018 17:58
If the boring babe's by a stake or go into management there then lads... Let's just watch them fall into oblivion
Better stations than this depleting shite
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - ShandyHand - 13-03-2018 19:56
^^^^First off, thanks for adding these chatbox grabs. Please continue to do this as gallery comments of this sort need preserving here.
Tbh though mate you can tell you're relatively new to the forum, as most of the topics you mention, while interesting, have been discussed here since almost day one.
There's always pertinent stuff coming out of the channels though, and the changes that happen over the years do affect things, so it's good to revisit and see what guys can add.
On the specifics: Ofcom presumably have avenues of communication to the operators and can deliver some sort of informal warning should they feel the need. (This has been assumed before on here without direct evidence IIRC.) As to this gallery's message though, these guys have to work with their rules every day, I don't think we can assume Ofcom have been in touch every time they mention their name. If anything formal has happened it'll be in the regulator's monthly bulletins shortly - all available online. It'll be posted here for sure it that happens. They always are.
Stacey's bra on Sunday and Cara in outwear covering her flimsy top today, might mean the nips issue has been mentioned to all the babes not just Heather. And she just got it worst. (FWIW, I also saw the first logo-ing I've seen on nights for a very long time the other night. It was on Hannah's show.)
But on to your list:
1. ...Art is too pretentious a word for any of this. (Although if the babeshows were in a gallery Ofcom would never have gone near! :rollseyes: ) All 66 SHOULD be concerned with on expression is whether their callers are getting VFM on TV (complicated now by the availabilty of the cams) and if babes are being held back for dubious reasons (professional jealously or the protection of a certain way of working). Genuine compliance should be the only thing holding back expression.
All I'd say is that in 10 years of watching the shows I've never seen such a blatant and heavy handed repression of a babe's instincts as we got at the weekend in the name of complaince.
2. Of course, it's utterly fundamental. More so on nights but still... That a major fan of Fern has to ask this I find surprising.
3. Hmmm, massively thorny issue. Perhaps best if you do a forum search for the term 'favouritism'! For now, let's just say it seems likely that it can be a factor. However, with Heather it had the appearance of some sort of disciplinary measure rather than anything else.
4. 66 must be concerned at the prospect of losing Fern. She is unique on the shows these days and must be a major source of revenue. She is given some extra leeway in terms of expression on TV because of this, I think it's quite plain. What also looks to be the case is if six Ferns walked in off the street in the current climate they wouldn't be allowed to work in the way the current one does. But established Fern gets away with it, so you may conclude that, ultimately, she'd walk away if not accommodated.
5. Would they look to replace like for like performance wise if Fern went? I don't see it as a development programme of any sort. I don't think they look at it in any other terms than revenue and ensuring a balance of 'looks' (in term babes body type, hair, so forth) over their roster. I was talking of Heather as of the Fern type performer in the eyes of the fans only.
6. This was babelover. But I imagine he was thinking of a 'move upstairs' like Lilly Badcock did at BS (no idea if this likely for Fern) or those increasingly managing their own glamour careers away from the channels. The channels are various kinds of stepping stones for most babes.
Finally it's also interesting that gallery is quite pointed in not giving himself a first name. Can't blame him really as he'd only get berated on there and here. (Stacey R 'outed' "Alex" on the mic just before Heather started so he could have been a morning or afternoon shift guy. I don't think we cleared up that changeover time on here recently.)
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - ShandyHand - 14-03-2018 15:14
I now see Ofcom's Broadcast Bulletins went fortnightly a while back. Next one is out around 19th March if anyone is waiting on it.
It'll appear here.Also a rough time of capping might be useful when guys are kind enough to post chatbox grabs. Cheers.
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - MikeyCr - 15-03-2018 11:09
First Anna Martin, now Anna Arris?? Someone at studio66 despises the letter H
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 15-03-2018 12:02
^And Macy has, apparently, dropped the 'Leigh' from her name. There's definitely an issue going on. Hannah & Anastasia are long established models. Why they'd suddenly change their names is a mystery. Maybe some oddballs out there have been stalking them or their families. That's just a worse case scenario, obviously.
RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Skyline - 15-03-2018 17:44
It's so good coming home from a hard day's work and seeing the sensational Heather Kay on my screen, so glad she's doing a mid-week show and I hope she continues with these...waiting a whole week to see this beautiful woman from Sunday to Sunday is just too dam long (but well worth the wait).
...my bad meant to post this on Heather chat and discussion