RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 08-12-2019 19:32
We should make "Fuck off OFCOM" the Christmas No1 single!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 08-12-2019 20:09
With the amount of underwear Caty has given away I am not surprised she has none left!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-12-2019 20:24
(08-12-2019 18:21 )Stemmw Wrote: (08-12-2019 18:00 )jennifer Wrote: I noticed that Caty said "I like knickers! I like NO knickers but I'm not allowed to do that..."
Yeah BS and S66 have adopted a "no nudity" rule as of late. I spoke to Lola on S66 and she said she wasn't allowed to take off her panties, also she said she hopes it doesn't last too long like this. Fucking fuckoffcom sticking their beak in and ruining it for the rest of us.
I don't think the night time rules have changed, just the channels being very cautious as fuckoffcom said they were watching very closely
That’s exactly it, Ofcom have warned the channels they were keeping an eye on them, in particular on the transition from days to nights & vice versa
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 09-12-2019 23:18
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Topless only Babestation = boring.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 10-12-2019 02:31
Was surprised to see S66's Lycia Sharyl and as expected she has been shunted behind the scenes BUT she is doing some terrific strips and has great movement and gyrations-this could be the natural place for her.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 10-12-2019 07:24
i see alfleece is down for tonight,wonder if atlantas free for an hour to give her a few lessons on how to do a webshow,my god there aint a bad difference between the two
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Patrick645 - 10-12-2019 11:12
My view is that even with a fine tooth comb Ofcom will not find a single thing worthy of complaint with these channels for many years now. Nudity without labia exposure is the most explicit thing any of these channels perform on tv now. Ofcom can't do one damn thing about that... Anyone currently complaining must be confusing the webshows with tv - again Ofcom can't do one damn thing about the webshows. So even if Ofcom are currently scrutinizing these channels, only the naive think that they have anything to worry about. The fact that the webshows and pervcam are making so much more money than just the phone calls means that the studios are happy to play the Ofcom card. Unfortunately the real money is no longer in the tv shows, but don't be fooled about what powers Ofcom possess.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dave_A - 10-12-2019 15:32
If BS wanted, and thought it would be worth their wile, they could show a separate feed on freeview and Sky, they have done it before.
The non Ofcom Dutch regulated Freeview channels could generally show the same sort of content that both the Sky and Freeview channels were showing before the recent taming of the shows on both platforms, and keep the tamer ones they do now on Sky for the time being .
I doubt very much they would consider this, as i believe the crack down has given them a reason to tame down the tv shows to encourage viewers to switch to watching web only shows .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 10-12-2019 16:24
if theres a way of making money from it they will,
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Patrick645 - 10-12-2019 17:25
(10-12-2019 15:32 )Dave_A Wrote: If BS wanted, and thought it would be worth their wile, they could show a separate feed on freeview and Sky, they have done it before.
The non Ofcom Dutch regulated Freeview channels could generally show the same sort of content that both the Sky and Freeview channels were showing before the recent taming of the shows on both platforms, and keep the tamer ones they do now on Sky for the time being .
I doubt very my they would consider this, as i believe the crack down has given them a reason to tame down the tv shows to encourage viewers to switch to watching web only shows .
Exactly. That is why the crackdown is not necessary at all; but it suits the channels to hide behind Ofcom's investigations as the reason to tone things down even further than they already were. When what they were was perfectly satisfactory within Ofcom's rules.
|