The UK Babe Channels Forum
Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Red Light Central (/forumdisplay.php?fid=191)
+---- Thread: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=25154)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - continental19 - 07-02-2012 10:51

(07-02-2012 10:48 )KerrAvon Wrote:  
(07-02-2012 10:04 )Broncobilly Wrote:  They will be doing them when they get clearance i'm sure but they will respect the rules.

And when will that be? 2012, 2013, 2014....

The problem is no one really knows the shifting state of Ofcom's made up as they go along rules except themselves it seems. But the channels only definitely find out when they're suddenly hit with a breach or fine.

It's a bit like the saying, how long is a piece of string, by the sounds of it.


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 07-02-2012 11:22

No one likes the restrictions but we can't expect them to do things that they know in advance will get them into trouble. I'm sure they don't like having to be so careful anymore than we do.


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 07-02-2012 11:32

(07-02-2012 00:33 )winsaw Wrote:  
(07-02-2012 00:17 )continental19 Wrote:  I mean it seems Babestation are even being allowed the Hand Thong now, which is great news for them and us. I remember the early stages of Redlight it was Hand Thongs Galore especially with Lucy summers. Oh well I guess time will tell.Smile

this is what playboy say about the hand thong "stopping presenters cupping their genitals until they have further clarity on the issue", i guess they are still waiting for that clarity to arrive Rolleyes

I've said this before and i will say it again , the hand thong technique is allowed by Ofcom , Ofcom said so on their own website . When the new rules were brought out in 2010 Ofcom clarified a few things that weren't exactly clear , they made it clear that boobs were not allowed out before 10pm and the girls couldn't get naked till after 11pm , Ofcom also clarified that the girls could use their hands to cover themselves when naked , Ofcom stated that the girls should whenever possible use straight fingers to cover themselves , winsaw uses the term "cupping" to cover themselves , so it's possibly this method that needs clarification , the term cupping seems to indicate that RLC are asking Ofcom if the girls can cup their hands round their lady bits in stead of using straight fingered hand thong method .
Anyway whatever Playboy/RLC want clarifying about the matter the facts are that the girls can use their hands to cover themselves and Playboy/RLC WOULD NOT get into trouble if they did it . Ofcom have clarified this in one of their own bulletins , and Playboy's rival channels are doing it night after night and week after week , they wouldn't be doing it if it was against the rules , Ofcom would have found them in breach by now .


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - continental19 - 07-02-2012 12:03

Great post mystery, I agree with you ofcom have clearly stated that the Hand Thong is allowable, maybe Redlight/playboy are waiting for a bit more clarification before they go ahead?


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 07-02-2012 12:49

I'm going to say something now that i believe may have a bearing on RLC/Playboy not letting their girls use the hand thong method , i hope this is OK as it concerns a breach of the rules made by RLC , Ofcom already know about it and have already found Playboy "in breach" and given them a fine for the incident , the incident took place in April last year (2011) , a RLC girl was using the hand thong method and was sitting on the back of a black lounger style seat , the camera was fairly close but not zoomed right in , the girl sat to far back on the lounger and lost her balance , she removed her covering hand to grab old of the seat to prevent herself falling backward , thus revealing all for a split second , the camera man was very alert and instantly paned up to the ceiling , Playboy explained the circumstances to Ofcom but still got found "in breach" , my own guess is that Playboy don't want to risk anymore accidents taking place and getting more fines , so probably don't want to start doing the hand thong again , well not just yet anyway especially as there is the possibility of slips occurring , people are still making complaints about RLC to Ofcom , RLC is mentioned in the latest Ofcom bulletin , the good news is that ofcom didn't think the complaints were worth investigating .
To be honest i can understand why Playboy/RLC isn't showing the type of material that BS is showing , it seems to me that someone is monitoring everything RLC does and is just waiting for a slip so that they can report them to Ofcom , staying on the safe side is probably the best course of action at this time .


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 07-02-2012 15:23

(06-02-2012 14:15 )zola Wrote:  Kandi has so far been a great signing based on her performance yesterday. Now it has been revealed they have also signed ella jolie.
Now a question I'm sure everyone wants answered is can we now see more than one girl on a channel at a time?, I mean how about some 2-4-1 or even 2 girls with 2 phones that occasionally interact.
RLC now have the best looking girls, with kandi, ekka dionne,jemma jey, tori etc, so they could really be the best channel with a little shake up of the roster,
Right, so Kandi WAS on a channel where she was crammed on screen with 1 or 2 other babes at a time, and is now free to roam around (so to speak) on her lonesome for hours on end.

And you think RLC should build on this success... by putting another babe on to cram things up again!?

Are you in Marketing? Rolleyes


[split] RLC Schedule - KerrAvon - 07-02-2012 15:35

(06-02-2012 21:42 )winsaw Wrote:  Wednesday 8 February-

2200-0530 Ruby Summers, Chloe Coles(PB), Dionne Mendez, Sarah Daniels

Is this the same Chloe from TVX? I hope so because that byatch is FINE Tongue


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - zola - 07-02-2012 15:36

(07-02-2012 15:23 )Doddle Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 14:15 )zola Wrote:  Kandi has so far been a great signing based on her performance yesterday. Now it has been revealed they have also signed ella jolie.
Now a question I'm sure everyone wants answered is can we now see more than one girl on a channel at a time?, I mean how about some 2-4-1 or even 2 girls with 2 phones that occasionally interact.
RLC now have the best looking girls, with kandi, ekka dionne,jemma jey, tori etc, so they could really be the best channel with a little shake up of the roster,
Right, so Kandi WAS on a channel where she was crammed on screen with 1 or 2 other babes at a time, and is now free to roam around (so to speak) on her lonesome for hours on end.

And you think RLC should build on this success... by putting another babe on to cram things up again!?

Are you in Marketing? Rolleyes

No I'm not Big Laugh, I was just Saying Kandi does great 2-4-1 shows as proved last week with priya, and that it is a shame she will not be doing that anymore especially as RLC have better girl such as dionne,torie jemma and now ella


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 07-02-2012 15:46

The solo shows have been good even though they had to tame things down. Red have lots of women who put on good shows.


RE: Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 07-02-2012 15:55

My only concern about the new signings is the amount of night slots they'll be able to get on RLC. They've got a lot of night capable girls now. Even with four channels, some of their own girls don't get enough play. Rebecca Jade and Rachel Taylor are two that come to mind.