The UK Babe Channels Forum
Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394

RE: Ofcom Discussion - MONEY BANG - 23-02-2013 18:30

(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Munch thanked and didn't condemn the post quoted below that admits to "digging", lets not forget that the same "digging" applied to another forum fantasist, (simply looking at a facebook profile, which exposed years of lies posted on this forum), yet that "digging" was frowned upon.



(23-02-2013 11:00 )Digital Dave Wrote:  ^^^ Spot on, munch.

I knew she was a fantasist when she was last here two years ago because there were too many inconsistencies and generalities in what she said.

I've done a little digging on her and it's very interesting. She made the classic error of linking to her real Facebook page from her profile here (she's now removed the link).

Rather strange that people exposing freaks stealing photos of babies and children to share with members of this forum is frowned upon, yet those same members who defended that freak are playing detective with RCTV.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Addison - 23-02-2013 19:03

(23-02-2013 11:55 )admiral decker Wrote:  
(23-02-2013 01:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Recently Dundee United changed their manager. Out went not only the departing manger but also the assistant and the first team coach also. So based on that I'd imagine whoever replaces ED in any future Ofcom committee would also want to bring in his/her own team.

So by following events at Dundee United we can better understand how Ofcom works. Rolleyes

That comparison was meant to clarify, but it just gets in the way of the point being made (we end up veering away from footy entirely at the end, into a consideration of who should get the blame when a ship sinks!). It perhaps works better when applied to the babe shows themselves. Like football clubs, they're competitively run organisations, out to win viewers and 'beat' their competitors, with babes signing and transferring to other channels, like star players. Ofcom is/are more like match officials, monitoring proceedings, with no vested interest in the 'result,' ensuring the rules of the game are abided by, and answerable to a higher agency (Parliament) as referees are (the F.A., FIFA).

RE: Ofcom Discussion - The Silent Majority - 23-02-2013 21:10

(23-02-2013 18:30 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Because it makes you look naive.

I only have a college diploma and know fuck all about ofcom but even I could see that it wasn't a PhD writing those posts.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Addison - 23-02-2013 21:23

(23-02-2013 21:10 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  I only have a college diploma and know fuck all about ofcom but even I could see that it wasn't a PhD writing those posts.

I always thought the 'PhD' thing was referencing the name of a production company ("Production Professional with PhD," not "with a Phd"). Meant to make you do a double-take, but not relating to an acquired qualification.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - The Silent Majority - 23-02-2013 21:36

(23-02-2013 21:23 )Addison Wrote:  I always thought the 'PhD' thing was referencing the name of a production company ("Production Professional with PhD," not "with a Phd"). Meant to make you do a double-take, but not relating to an acquired qualification.

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=53112

RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 23-02-2013 21:47

(23-02-2013 18:30 )MONEY BANG Wrote:  
(23-02-2013 17:00 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  What's wrong?

Embarrassed that you're the only one that thanked almost every post he/she made?

Why would that be embarrassing?

Munch thanked and didn't condemn the post quoted below that admits to "digging", lets not forget that the same "digging" applied to another forum fantasist, (simply looking at a facebook profile, which exposed years of lies posted on this forum), yet that "digging" was frowned upon.



(23-02-2013 11:00 )Digital Dave Wrote:  ^^^ Spot on, munch.

I knew she was a fantasist when she was last here two years ago because there were too many inconsistencies and generalities in what she said.

I've done a little digging on her and it's very interesting. She made the classic error of linking to her real Facebook page from her profile here (she's now removed the link).

Rather strange that people exposing freaks stealing photos of babies and children to share with members of this forum is frowned upon, yet those same members who defended that freak are playing detective with RCTV.

Well i'm glad both have now been exposed, and neither can be defended in my book, both seem to have the same problem in that they live in fantasy land and wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit them on the ass .
This is a Ofcom thread read by forum members and unregistered guests, some of us post stuff in this thread at times that may not be entirely accurate, but generally that's through ignorance because we don't know the facts, it's not us telling complete lies, we don't go round telling people we work for Ofcom or have worked for Ofcom, RCTV has been telling a complete pack of lies and misleading forum members into thinking he/she worked for Ofcom for 4 or so years and telling us stuff about his/her role in Ofcom that was completely fictitious . So i'm glad people have been doing a little digging to get to the truth about RCTV the same as i was about the other fantasy land member .

RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 23-02-2013 21:49

(04-07-2010 22:07 )RCTV Wrote:  I've been sent this picture of it claiming to be someone who it obviously isn't. I wondered if anyone could tell me who this is or if they recognise the picture?
[Image: 3699894_stressed.jpg]

Yes it's me, i'm actually female and work for Ofcom Bounce

RE: Ofcom Discussion - Addison - 23-02-2013 21:56

(23-02-2013 21:36 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=53112

Fair enough! Hard to credit, but again, you take things on trust until you definitely know otherwise.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - RCTV - 24-02-2013 01:23

great how you guys seem to be jumping on someone who hasn't put any actual evidence down. WELL DONE VERY CLEVER OF YOU!!!!!

Dave you such a BIG MAN pming people with claims about me, why don't you pm them to me, I don't use my real name on that facebook Big Grin

You can have dyslexia and get a PhD. a PhD doesn't equal amazing English and Grammar, it means you have a specialist knowledge in a subject area.

RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 24-02-2013 01:30

Lets not turn into one of those forums where the members spend all their time having a go at each other. What matters is the rules Ofcom imposes.