RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-02-2020 00:49
(12-02-2020 00:00 )ShandyHand Wrote: ^ There was a problem with Paige's phone according to the chatbox. She had a conversation with someone behind the camera with looks to her phone before disappearing.
The chat box is more entertaining than the S66 nightshow product 99.99% of the time
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - 4waydiablo - 12-02-2020 01:05
(12-02-2020 00:02 )Liverred Wrote: Shame about Paige, for once she was upright and worth watching.
She was only gone for a few minutes!
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 12-02-2020 07:48
Have to say Both S66 and BS have been Piss poor for months really got into XP at moment i know not the best moves wise but actually got girls who get your attention and keep it
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - RutgerWhore - 12-02-2020 10:14
I don't understand why when you go to the S66 site you get an age restricted screen sometimes but you can go to a certain other site and watch the same girl there. For example, right now Daisy is Age Restricted on S66 site but I can see her on the other site.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - GMach1 - 12-02-2020 10:47
They want you to pay for it now and most of the girls are now doing b/g with their boyfriends at home which means perv cam.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - 2015watcher - 12-02-2020 15:32
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 12-02-2020 15:56
If £334.28 was 50% of the money she brought in, then double that and divide by the 48 hours worked, and she was generating £13.92 per hour. Based on that, it doesn't seem to make sense to pay £20 per hour for that, but of course if that is what they promised they need to pay up.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 12-02-2020 18:12
^ Yes. Communication of intent would not seem to be their strong point! (I'm deliberately trying to avoid the obvious conclusion in saying same.) The £180 they "might" be able to add is, interestingly, the equivalent of £20 per shift rather than the per hour Amanda believes she was promised. Hmmm.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 12-02-2020 19:09
(12-02-2020 15:56 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: If £334.28 was 50% of the money she brought in, then double that and divide by the 48 hours worked, and she was generating £13.92 per hour. Based on that, it doesn't seem to make sense to pay £20 per hour for that, but of course if that is what they promised they need to pay up.
Fully agree, if s66 agreed to pay £20 an hour, they have to honour their side of the contract, especially given Amanda is getting legal advice.
Plus Amanda can also hurt s66 by telling people not to use s66 cams given they treat babes like this & tell other potential models not to work for s66
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Chrisst - 12-02-2020 21:08
That's the thing about things that seem too good to be true.
|