Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266) +----- Forum: Former Studio 66 Daytime babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=312) +----- Thread: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=22764) |
RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 01-11-2010 08:45 (01-11-2010 04:46 )HEX!T Wrote: now thats how a 2-4-1 should be done. much better than the caty/charlie 1 yesterday. ...They probably practice every day at home, they are an item. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - mrichie10 - 01-11-2010 10:16 (01-11-2010 02:20 )Rise Wrote:(01-11-2010 02:10 )mrichie10 Wrote: As much as i loved becky and rachael performances tonite i have always been skeptical of becky cause she reminds me of danica alittle which i'm not sure whether thats a good or bad thing, but at this moment becky is still on doing her thing for england :-p out of the two i perfer becky cause she seems to want to please her fans/viewers hopefully she will continue to do nites Thankyou for correct me that always happens, as i said in my earlier thread i perfer Rachel than becky due to which i feel Racheal alot more down to earth than becky; Rachel is the bubbly one and Becky come across as the fiesty one. Not that i have a problem with fiesty people because i'm exactly the same being a Scorpio but i also like humour RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 01-11-2010 10:56 Missed becky and rachel's show last night as I was in London. Glad to hear they had a good night RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - RRROGER - 01-11-2010 11:10 The day show up to 8pm was close to night show standards; even after 9pm after their break it was hard to tell the difference until they took their tops off, then the show was smouldering....... ...only way they could have improved it would be by getting Danica back for a guest appearance & using her as the filling for a Becky/Rachel sandwich. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - annakatherine - 01-11-2010 11:23 Loved this show.. XXX RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - chrislatimer - 01-11-2010 11:38 (01-11-2010 04:46 )HEX!T Wrote: now thats how a 2-4-1 should be done. much better than the caty/charlie 1 yesterday. i agree with hex it was a much better 2 4 1 then the caty charlie 1, becky and rachel dont really need to get so filthy its the spark they have between them that makes their night shows compelling RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - Rise - 01-11-2010 12:22 (01-11-2010 11:23 )Anna Lovato Wrote: Loved this show.. XXX Just wish you'd still been around to join in, Anna. That would have taken it to the next level for sure! RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 01-11-2010 12:55 (01-11-2010 11:38 )chrislatimer Wrote:(01-11-2010 08:45 )RRROGER Wrote:(01-11-2010 04:46 )HEX!T Wrote: now thats how a 2-4-1 should be done. much better than the caty/charlie 1 yesterday. For me it was just as good, but I wouldn't say better than the Caty/Charlie one. The four of them are super cute women who work well with each other, though I would like to see Becky and Rachel get naked. The topless thing is great with the two of them, but for the whole night it can get a bit old, which is why I'd like to see them get fully nude like Caty and Charlie do. Maybe they have decided they just want to do topless on nights, while revealing a bit more here and there. Good show nonetheless!!! Loved their outfits!!! RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - HEX!T - 01-11-2010 17:19 thing is m8 im sick of the taking off of panties and covering with the palm. its just pointless. id rather they kept there panties on if they cant show, or at least if they do take them off, they put them back on after the call has ended. the girls last night hit the right balance for me, they didnt have to worry that the cam was gonna catch a slip so they just got on wit it. the reason i got bored with pantie-less shows is that more often than not they just end up lying on there front waiting for the next caller. caty being the 1 exception but even then she still gets repetitive in the positions she gets into while waiting. there is no real reason to do an entire shift without panties as it really does limit the girls mobility and the cam ops ability to get decent angles. RE: Becky & Rachel - Nightshow Special - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 01-11-2010 17:32 (01-11-2010 17:19 )HEX!T Wrote: thing is m8 im sick of the taking off of panties and covering with the palm. its just pointless. id rather they kept there panties on if they cant show, or at least if they do take them off, they put them back on after the call has ended. Good point! Usually the women (Not so much Caty) are more subdued when they are naked, because they have to be careful, whereas the non nude shows offer more movement usually. I like a balance really, but still think they could get away with a bit more, as another channel has done so and I haven't seen any fines yet. Alright, enough complaining from me! I'm happy as a clam |