Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Digital Dave - 24-02-2013 02:34 (24-02-2013 01:23 )RCTV Wrote: great how you guys seem to be jumping on someone who hasn't put any actual evidence down. WELL DONE VERY CLEVER OF YOU!!!!! Give it up and get help. RE: Ofcom Discussion - RCTV - 24-02-2013 02:36 (24-02-2013 02:34 )Digital Dave Wrote:(24-02-2013 01:23 )RCTV Wrote: great how you guys seem to be jumping on someone who hasn't put any actual evidence down. WELL DONE VERY CLEVER OF YOU!!!!! awww don't like someone fighting back. poor you, makes me so sad. You seem to totally ignore that post, as it actually gives reasons that you don't like as it can totally disprove what you said. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 24-02-2013 02:50 FIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!! RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 24-02-2013 11:06 This Ofcom thread is going off track, mainly due to the wild and seemingly fraudulent claims by RCTV to have worked for Ofcom and the Babe channels, RCTV has said he/she worked for BS and Bangbabes, RCTV has said he/she was a producer of these shows, RCTV has claimed that he/she worked for Ofcom between 2004 and 2008 (i think), RCTV has even said that he/she managed to get slight changes to the rules, then there is the claims made about running a babe channel in Spain etc and being prevented from broadcasting in the UK by Ofcom . RCTV has been using this so called insider knowledge that he/she claims to have when in debates concerning the channel and Ofcom etc to give weight to what he she is saying, these seemingly fraudulent claims have led people to think that RCTV is actually a Ofcom member come onto this forum to give info concerning how Ofcom actually does things, RCTV has been given a rep for being a Ofcom member prepared to come on here and explain things,. People are actually believing RCTV's claims to have worked for Ofcom are true and that he/she knows more about how the babe channels and Ofcom are run than the rest of us . What i will say to RCTV is put up or shut up concerning you're Ofcom and babe channel CV. Seemingly fraudulent claims to have worked for Ofcom and the Babe channels has led to this Ofcom thread going off track and no serious Ofcom debates taking place due to you're claims, you you're self will not be taken seriously until you prove these claims are true, these claims can easily be verified to admin in private, you claim that some of the babe channel girls know you from you're time working on the babe channels, many girls, producers, babe channel staff still work on the channels today that did when you say you worked on the channel, some are members of this forum so should be able to verify who you claim to be, Cellcast will also be able to verify that you were a employee of theirs, admin is in contact with Cellcast and the other channels, so could verify this for you, Jamie from Studio 66 was the main producer of Bangbabes before he joined Studio 66, so presumably he could verify that you worked for Bangbabes . IMO if you want anyone to take seriously anything you say concerning you're knowledge of Ofcom and the babe channels then you need to prove that you're claims aren't fraudulent . RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 25-02-2013 15:15 I don't think you're going to get a response RE: Ofcom Discussion - Carl-Gen X - 25-02-2013 16:58 No response has been provided by RCTV since Mr Mystery's post was written over 24 hours ago. All I have seen is the Ofcom discussion being well and truly derailed and shifted down a blind alley of claims which I would consider to be questionable at best. Of course the claims made by RCTV could be genuine, but my instincts tell me they are not, just too many indescrepencies for me to take what he/she says seriously, and I'd hazard a guess that the same feeling is shared by many on here. Floor is yours RCTV....prove us wrong.....in your own time........ RE: Ofcom Discussion - shano123 - 25-02-2013 17:26 i agree, need proof that RCTV worked for ofcom. Its too good to be true for my liking, i mean its like me saying I was a producer at bangbabes. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Addison - 25-02-2013 23:25 Regardless of whether or not RCTV once worked for Ofcom, the interrogation of her/him was starting get unpleasantly pack-like. Three or four forum members at a time, circling round insisting on explanations isn't particularly good form. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mh92 - 26-02-2013 00:33 (25-02-2013 23:25 )Addison Wrote: Regardless of whether or not RCTV once worked for Ofcom, the interrogation of her/him was starting get unpleasantly pack-like. Three or four forum members at a time, circling round insisting on explanations isn't particularly good form. I was thinking that, also find it quite ironic that there is a group of people who claim that someone doesn't work for ofcom when they have no knowledge of ofcom's internal workings. For all we know RCTV could be telling the truth, just he/she (assuming she by her signature) but rather than using official documents, she's using her own memory, far shot, but could be true. RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 26-02-2013 07:02
for gods sake can we move on, how long is it now this subject has been discussed ? i myself couldnt care less about who has or who is working where ever ,but i am interested in the creditable posts made about the thread title
|