The UK Babe Channels Forum
Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 DAYTIME GENERAL FORUM (/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+----- Thread: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=8090)



RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 26-05-2018 14:00

There is a part of me that thinks that If St66 created new sets they'd probably be more boring than the ones they have now what I'd like to see them create are sets that do offer interaction for both babe and caller or at least tweak their guidelines a touch so the babes do a little more interaction so that both babe and caller get some enjoyment.

Given how long it has been since Tiffany left, I would say that her place has been filled admirably by the likes of Kira, Heather and Lily, but at the same time checking the 'Girls' section of their site there are no images on the list for both Heather or Lily or any of the other babes they have introduced to us lately, which makes me think they use Heather or any other new babe as one to fill in the schedule if a regular is sick.


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 26-05-2018 15:10

^No, the 'fill-in' or 'appear-ONLY-when-someone-is-hungover-or-can't-be-arsed' job is already taken by Thai.

As far as new sets go I think we ALL know 66 are too lazy, uninterested, and cheap to bother.


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 26-05-2018 15:40

^Who would that have been applied to today?


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Robot Devil - 26-05-2018 15:46

God knows, mate. She's looking good, regardless. She certainly puts the effort in. Unlike a certain girl that's on today.


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 26-05-2018 15:55

^Which i can only assume is a certain girl on Opt. 4 today that you are referring to.

And wha i like about Thai is that she adds a touch of exoticness to the viewing and does draw you in.....


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Skyline - 26-05-2018 16:08

I don't care what set the babe/girl is on, if it's used in the best possible way to maximise it's potential then I'm a happy viewer, but if I tune in and see someone playing with their mobile,hair or anything else other than trying to engage an audience then I just lose interest!


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 26-05-2018 16:33

There are also times when they have 1 (or more) babes when babes "backstage" (or perv cam) and only two babes on stream I can't see why the don't exploit that and let the babes on live stream do a 2-4-1.


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Rake - 26-05-2018 16:54

(26-05-2018 15:10 )Robot Devil Wrote:  ^No, the 'fill-in' or 'appear-ONLY-when-someone-is-hungover-or-can't-be-arsed' job is already taken by Thai.

I get the distinct impression that Thai gets a bum deal at S66. She has been the victim of the TV feed-gone-missing-on-the-website for 2 weekends in a row at least before today, and the last time is was not rectified after I asked the producer via the chat, still not rectified after Thai herself asked them too.

She always does shifts weekends and bank holidays but I think this might be due to her residing and working in another part of the country in the week?


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - lovebabes56 - 26-05-2018 16:59

^Which TV are you on about mate?


RE: Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread - Rake - 26-05-2018 21:00

(26-05-2018 16:59 )babelover48 Wrote:  ^Which TV are you on about mate?

Any TV in the world that is tuned to whatever channel Thai Marder is shown on S66.

Anyway she is rather dull so maybe that's why they give her the graveyard shifts and screw her over?