+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - barracuda - 06-06-2015 09:27
(04-06-2015 22:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.
I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 06-06-2015 09:58
(06-06-2015 06:35 )Charlemagne Wrote: Whilst I welcome a few new faces on their nightshow, I can't help feeling that Aimee Luis was a reluctant participant.
It would be better to try the gorgeous Thai Mander.
First night nerves maybe?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 06-06-2015 09:59
(06-06-2015 09:27 )barracuda Wrote:(04-06-2015 22:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.
I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.
Depends why they sacked her? She wasn't there long enough to mess up
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 06-06-2015 10:59
How do we know Lacey was sacked? Does anyone know that as a fact?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 06-06-2015 12:15
(06-06-2015 09:27 )barracuda Wrote:True. but they are short of quality girls like Lacey so she would have had to done something quite bad for them to sack her(04-06-2015 22:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Lacey's bio on the website has been changed. It had said "No longer a sinner" but now it just has her name. It may mean nothing but maybe they aren't ruling out a return.
I can't see why they would take her back, after having sacked her. They aren't exactly short of girls.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 06-06-2015 12:51
(06-06-2015 10:59 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: How do we know Lacey was sacked? Does anyone know that as a fact?
could be various reasons why lacey left sintv, just because she wasn't there that long doesn't mean she was sacked.
cant really say lacey was sacked unless you have proof or lacey herself has said she was
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - FanofCamilla - 06-06-2015 13:01
Lacey has always been terribly unreliable, so that may be the reason.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 06-06-2015 13:20
Was she unreliable at Sin? Bit hard to say when there was no schedule to check it against.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 06-06-2015 14:47
She even worked the morning show a couple of times after working all night and she was arguably one of their best babes, but it is a bit strange why she would leave Sin TV to join Xpanded even though Sin TV is just like Xpanded now
BTW Rammy why do you still defend girls you don't even watch? i wouldn't leap to the defence of Louise Porter if someone said she has been sacked, how many babes say they were sacked publicly anyway?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - trax - 06-06-2015 15:19
(06-06-2015 14:47 )Joey 27 Wrote: She even worked the morning show a couple of times after working all night and she was arguably one of their best babes, but it is a bit strange why she would leave Sin TV to join Xpanded even though [undefined=undefined]Sin TV is just like Xpanded now[/undefined]
BTW Rammy why do you still defend girls you don't even watch? i wouldn't leap to the defence of Louise Porter if someone said she has been sacked, how many babes say they were sacked publicly anyway?
Bit harsh don't you think?
Sin may be a bit safe and people on this forum don't like multiple babes onscreen but at least Sin actually has more than one set and has a good camera quality (not blurred like Xpanded) plus they actually have a usable website.
Xpanded is the worst Babeshow ever and now they've taken over RLC which is kick in balls for the future of the Babe Channels.