+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: Former Studio 66 babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+------ Forum: Anna Lovato (/forumdisplay.php?fid=139)
+------ Thread: Anna Lovato Online (/showthread.php?tid=18381)
RE: Anna Lovato Online - chrislatimer - 06-04-2010 20:41
(06-04-2010 20:39 )PillowPants Wrote: I may be changing the subject a bit,but all i want to know is the site any good? I want to subscribe,but i'm holding off untill i read enough reviews on the forum before i commit myself.
Is it just another bog standard Cellcast type site? in which case i won't bother.
the videos are between 7-15 mins and some people i have heard arent to happy with the pics.
go back through the pages and read.
RE: Anna Lovato Online - Hollywood PillowPants - 06-04-2010 20:58
(06-04-2010 20:41 )chrislatimer Wrote: go back through the pages and read.
I have,Anna's contract i feel i could quote backwards,the website itself another matter.I just wondered if it was the same old trick where the previews are better than the actual site content.
RE: anna elite content for website - elitetvonline - 06-04-2010 22:43
Upon reflection I have chosen to remove my post as I feel I am allowing myself to be drawn in to a petty and unprofessional slanging match.
I have said my piece on the matter and will leave it there.
Many thanks,
Jamie.
RE: Anna Lovato Online - vila - 06-04-2010 23:40
(06-04-2010 20:11 )Hexit Wrote: sorry guys but yer wrong on this 1. as soon as anna signed the contract she agreed to the terms. whether she understood them or not.
(06-04-2010 20:15 )chrislatimer Wrote: the hex is right, the contractor does not legally have to double check every single point with the contractee. if the contractee was not sure about something, shouldnt of signed the contract in reality.
Nope, you're wrong, for the reasons I've given here: http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=8492&pid=483202#pid483202
RE: Anna Lovato Online - HEX!T - 07-04-2010 00:27
honestly vila you can go round and round. you say the contract is ambiguous when you yourself have not read it, there for have no grounds to make that statement other than hearsay.
AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS UP TO ANNA HOW SHE HANDLES THIS, she signed rightly or wrongly but it is legal until a court says otherwise.
RE: Anna Lovato Online - vila - 07-04-2010 01:13
(07-04-2010 00:27 )Hexit Wrote: honestly vila you can go round and round. you say the contract is ambiguous when you yourself have not read it, there for have no grounds to make that statement other than hearsay.
Bluebird's own post confirmed that Anna misunderstood the reference to her "own site". As I've said, if there's any wording in the document that can be misconstrued by either party, the contract can be declared invalid and unenforceable. That isn't my opinion, it's fact.
Quote:AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS UP TO ANNA HOW SHE HANDLES THIS, she signed rightly or wrongly but it is legal until a court says otherwise.
Obviously. I'm simply pointing out that it can be challenged. I thought that was plain enough.
RE: anna elite content for website - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 07-04-2010 04:22
(06-04-2010 22:43 )elitetvonline Wrote: Upon reflection I have chosen to remove my post as I feel I am allowing myself to be drawn in to a petty and unprofessional slanging match.
I have said my piece on the matter and will leave it there.
Many thanks,
Jamie.
Thanks Jamie.
Both our organisations are agreed to leave it there.
We're happy. Anna's happy
with her revised BB contract.Anyone who wants to spend the next 100 posts arguing about contract law in relation to a contract which no longer exists, rather than posting about babes is of course welcome to that pleasure.
Jamie, BB and Anna are all off to make hot babe content instead.
RE: Anna Lovato Online - woolleysheep - 07-04-2010 10:10
(06-04-2010 20:39 )PillowPants Wrote: I may be changing the subject a bit,but all i want to know is the site any good? I want to subscribe,but i'm holding off untill i read enough reviews on the forum before i commit myself.
Is it just another bog standard Cellcast type site? in which case i won't bother.
I think the Anna site is good, but I've only ever been a member of one Cellcast site so I can't make any meaningful comparison.
RE: Anna Lovato Online - woolleysheep - 07-04-2010 10:13
(06-04-2010 20:58 )PillowPants Wrote: the website itself another matter.I just wondered if it was the same old trick where the previews are better than the actual site content.
Were there any previews? I only saw this, so is that what you mean?
http://www.annalovatoonline.com/freevideo.asp
RE: Anna Lovato Online - HEX!T - 07-04-2010 10:25
(07-04-2010 01:13 )vila Wrote:well m8 theres a difference between pointing something out and bashing sum1 over the head and you chose the latter i was 1 of the first respondents to BB's announcement and i said you guys wouldn't be happy, im sorta glad you proved me rite but really it has gone on long enough. anna will do what anna thinks is best for anna, as it should be. BB and elite will do whats best for themselves too. and what we think on here is moot to them all.(07-04-2010 00:27 )Hexit Wrote: honestly vila you can go round and round. you say the contract is ambiguous when you yourself have not read it, there for have no grounds to make that statement other than hearsay.
Bluebird's own post confirmed that Anna misunderstood the reference to her "own site". As I've said, if there's any wording in the document that can be misconstrued by either party, the contract can be declared invalid and unenforceable. That isn't my opinion, it's fact.
Quote:AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS UP TO ANNA HOW SHE HANDLES THIS, she signed rightly or wrongly but it is legal until a court says otherwise.
Obviously. I'm simply pointing out that it can be challenged. I thought that was plain enough.