+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Calling The Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=409)
+---- Thread: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines (/showthread.php?tid=54123)
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - MONEY BANG - 22-04-2013 21:43
(22-04-2013 20:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: Did you try to Instruct him in the long lost art of Personal Responsibility by any chance?
Personal responsibility? If you take a look at the "Thatcher DEAD" thread on this forum you will see Babeshow fans of his age place the blame for their social inadequacies at the feet of that former Prime minister.
The issue of relevance: "In 1982, Racal Vodafone was awarded the first commercial mobile network operator licence in the UK by the Conservative Government"
(22-04-2013 20:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: Failing that, you could just tell him he's an Oxygen Thief.
Thatcher didn't privatise the air we breath, that was the Governor of Mars, Vilos Cohaagen.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - The Silent Majority - 22-04-2013 23:21
(22-04-2013 20:25 )MONEY BANG Wrote:(22-04-2013 15:23 )seth Wrote: How do you know Kev isn't a member here?
I spoke to him on the other forum.
So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?
(22-04-2013 21:43 )MONEY BANG Wrote:(22-04-2013 20:51 )Tumble_Drier Wrote: Did you try to Instruct him in the long lost art of Personal Responsibility by any chance?
Personal responsibility? If you take a look at the "Thatcher DEAD" thread on this forum you will see Babeshow fans of his age place the blame for their social inadequacies at the feet of that former Prime minister.
The issue of relevance: "In 1982, Racal Vodafone was awarded the first commercial mobile network operator licence in the UK by the Conservative Government"
And are you saying Kev's predicament is all Thatchers fault because she awarded Vodafone their first licence?
Interesting perspective.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - MONEY BANG - 23-04-2013 02:03
(22-04-2013 23:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote: So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?
If I was speaking on his behalf then this thread would have vanished by now.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - The Silent Majority - 23-04-2013 05:11
Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - BarrieBF - 23-04-2013 09:05
(22-04-2013 21:18 )elgar1uk Wrote: "take it from me do not make my mistakes, learn from my bad experience and hold on to your money and self respect".
It's good that Kev is recognising mistakes on his part, but does this mean he's shelved his video project?
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - marlowe - 23-04-2013 11:55
I've got a feeling that the video was just talk on Kev's part and will never materialise, though if it does appear it will be interesting to see what further he has to say.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - MONEY BANG - 23-04-2013 15:05
(23-04-2013 05:11 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?
He is bothered, very much so.
(23-04-2013 11:55 )marlowe Wrote: I've got a feeling that the video was just talk on Kev's part and will never materialise, though if it does appear it will be interesting to see what further he has to say.
He is in the process of setting up a foundation to help like-minded individuals break away from the hold and life dominance of the Babe Shows.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - The Silent Majority - 23-04-2013 15:13
(23-04-2013 02:03 )MONEY BANG Wrote:(22-04-2013 23:21 )The Silent Majority Wrote: So, are you speaking on his behalf then, when you ask for this thread to be deleted?
If I was speaking on his behalf then this thread would have vanished by now.
(23-04-2013 15:05 )MONEY BANG Wrote:(23-04-2013 05:11 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Well if he's not bothered, why is it bothering you so much?
He is bothered, very much so.
So you are speaking on his behalf, then.
I wish you'd make up your mind
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - archibald cockfoster - 23-04-2013 15:53
(23-04-2013 15:05 )MONEY BANG Wrote: He is bothered, very much so.
Reading the coverage and the comments he got in the newspapers must have utterly destroyed him then. He can consider himself fortunate that posters in this thread have been relatively kind to him.
RE: £91,000 phone bill calling chatlines - MONEY BANG - 23-04-2013 15:59
(23-04-2013 15:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote: So you are speaking on his behalf, then.
I wish you'd make up your mind
No, if I was speaking on his behalf, then this thread would have already vanished.
to "speak on behalf of a person or entity" is to "speak on their side or part as their explicitly or implicitly delegated representative."
To mention that he has publicly spoken about an individuals comments on this thread being devastating towards him is not "acting as a delegated representative".