+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 16-06-2015 18:45
(16-06-2015 18:29 )Broncobilly Wrote: The girls read the forums so they should take some of what we say to the production and change thingsThey might be averse to violence, though
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 16-06-2015 18:54
Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 16-06-2015 19:02
(16-06-2015 18:29 )Broncobilly Wrote: The girls read the forums so they should take some of what we say to the production and change thingsAs long as they are getting well paid i doubt they care about the production tbh, they won't get paid as well if they go on the x stream because hardly any one will call them regardless of what kind of show they put on, people seem to think the girls will bring in the calls if they are always on the x stream but they will never get as many calls as they will on the sky channel, because causal callers won't bother looking for the x stream, you could have Ella Jolie and Bex Shiner doing a Dom show together on Sky and they will still get more calls than a naked 2-4-1 between Ella Mai and Ree Petra on the x stream
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 16-06-2015 20:28
^Scary thought but probably true
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 16-06-2015 21:00
(15-06-2015 14:32 )babelover48 Wrote: I just wonder sometimes if the girls are plonked on the X - streams with the following instructions :-
"just fucking bore the viewers to death don't do anything remotely exciting!"
FFS!! lighten up sin TV, you are fucking adult channel and ffs do something worthy of an adult channel please!!
If you are not going to be exciting then you are not going to get any calls!!
Desperation and all round lack of belief in what they are doing on the xstreams is not conducive to putting out sexy shows is it?! IMO that's what we are seeing on there atm - a total lack of faith in the xstreams ability to bring in calls in any volume. As Joey has said, Sins' better regarded, more established, babes are now even using their clout to avoid appearing on there too often it would seem.
...Even if a girl on the xstream can manage to look sexy whilst pining for a call, she probably only has the eyes of a scant few hundred people that somehow managed to randomly catch the session..!
How many of those are likely to call do you think?! Maybe Sin, you should try something radical you know... like, erm, you know, maybe telling babe show fans when the sessions are going to be on, whom they will be featuring, and for how long!
And please stick to it! Short sessions will do a first (20 minutes say) and tell the girls to do as much as they can to build the audience for their second, third, or tenth such session. They need not to worry about getting calls early on (because they obviously aren't going to). But with consistency and regularity the audience and callers will build.That said, I also wonder if Sin do have comprehensive "viewing figures" for their webstreams at all as yet? You would hope they have enough info by now to see which shows went better than others in terms of page hits as well as calls. I'd want someone there building from stuff like that. (It doesn't look like anyone is planning a coherent strategy from that kind of data from the randomness we see on our monitors atm.) Hopefully, the small improvements made to their website and on their email communications recently are a truer indication of a better direction ahead.
I'm still hopeful this channel may still pull it out the bag at some point in the future (that's if they are really learning on the job)... but its definitely a little forlorn hope right now.
Edited for mangling typo!
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 16-06-2015 21:42
(16-06-2015 18:54 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want
Rammy why do you always support all of the girls ?
If Miss Piggy was on the babeshows with Kermit the frog you would support her
Keisha & Karina are certainly not top rated porn stars. I don`t want to watch their porn. If they were top rated porn stars then Brazzers or one of the other top porn producers would have signed them up
I don`t think that Keisha has been on a babeshow channel since she left Bang Babes before they closed down but I my be wrong
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 16-06-2015 21:51
(16-06-2015 21:00 )ShandyHand Wrote: snipWe keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - retah-rotaredom - 16-06-2015 21:54
(16-06-2015 21:42 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:(16-06-2015 18:54 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Wouldn't say Keisha Kane & Karina Currie are 3rd rate porn stars myself. I think they are top rate porn stars that would make other channels wish they were on their channels as they have lots of fans who will watch & call them and that's what channels want
Rammy why do you always support all of the girls ?
If Miss Piggy was on the babeshows with Kermit the frog you would support her
Keisha & Karina are certainly not top rated porn stars. I don`t want to watch their porn. If they were top rated porn stars then Brazzers or one of the other top porn producers would have signed them up
I don`t think that Keisha has been on a babeshow channel since she left Bang Babes before they closed down but I my be wrong
Keisha did a few stints on RLC summer of 2013 - some excellent shows. I know she isn't your taste but she is dirty, and knows how to pose.
As for tonight's line up, to call them 3rd rate would be flattery...
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 16-06-2015 22:02
(16-06-2015 21:51 )Broncobilly Wrote: We keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?
For me, not from what I've seen on-screen recently, no.
The only hope comes from how they set up and presented their output on-screen initially (up to their first couple weeks on Sky). I would like to think they still have plans to move back to that style when they can. Whether they will be able to is another question.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 16-06-2015 22:11
(16-06-2015 22:02 )ShandyHand Wrote:(16-06-2015 21:51 )Broncobilly Wrote: We keep hoping for an improvement, has anyone seen signs to give hope to this ?
For me, not from what I've seen on-screen recently, no.
The only hope comes from how they set up and presented their output on-screen initially (up to their first couple weeks on Sky). I would like to think they still have plans to move back to that style when they can. Whether they will be able to is another question.
There is no reason why they can't go back unless they are stuck in a rut and no one has the motivation to change