(21-12-2019 23:12 )Bluenose1959 Wrote:  I thought the MrP angle was great when it began and over the past 6 months it has of course moved on at a pace. Good for Alice (and more recently) to Sophie but Alice in particular. However is this a tease channel or something different? BSX or BSWeb? BSTV is admittedly awful these days. Last night’s Alice/MrP show was pretty average yet 6 months ago we’d have been celebrating. The show a week ago had us all thinking what went on when they blurred the screen? Cynically I suspect BS/Alice has and does make a significant amount of money from these shows and that’s supply and demand. But equally there is now an angel on one shoulder (tradition/tease) and a devil on the other (push the boundaries some more). Wherever you sit on this the production values need to keep up and they haven’t lately; MrP might have turned in for a shift last night despite being ‘ill’ but it might have been better if he hadn’t tried? But if the idea was to somehow recalibrate to six months back, that is probably not an option. So, BS MrPs whoever you are and the lovely BS girls, time for imagination and a strategy. Sorry - a first post and no wish to annoy, but surely I can’t be alone?

(22-12-2019 00:07 )TheProf Wrote:  I agree with you. The reheated Alice/Mr. P shows over the past few weeks have certainly raised a dilemma for BS and Alice. Fans (inc. myself) now completely disdain the routine cheesy 'sitting on the desk' TV routine, and eagerly look forward to the web-only offerings.
The problem now is how far the performers are prepared to go to satisfy the demands of a potentially huge audience. OK, I accept that pervcam is the vehicle to pay for this - but when it is so obvious that fakery is being employed (just witness the howls of derision from paying pervcam customers in the live feedback threads) - revenue must eventually dwindle as punters realise they are getting nothing extra for their money.
So what next? - do they employ real porn performers? - or remain at the current standard - possibly using more daring girls like Sophie H or the gloriously uninhibited Atlanta to push the boundaries (and cameramen/ MrP's who are better equipped to cope with the stresses of public performance)??
It would certainly be an interesting experiment for BS to really go for it on the webshow 1 or 2 nights per week to see if the revenue justified the investment. It would certainly dent the competition's audience on those nights.
What do folks think?

(21-12-2019 20:18 )GMach1 Wrote:  I bet if you look at her OnlyFans you won't find a single acutal b/g scene because she is not a porn star and of course married(okay Beth did some stuff but that was with her then boyfriend) and I doubt you will see her do it UNLESS she has a dramatic change of direction.

(22-12-2019 00:22 )Bluenose1959 Wrote:  

(22-12-2019 00:07 )TheProf Wrote:  

I think that’s precisely the dilemma but I agree too with @ai1234 Pandora’s Box has been opened. So there’s no “going back”. The question is what is going “forward”??

(22-12-2019 15:15 )shankey! Wrote:  

(21-12-2019 20:18 )GMach1 Wrote:  I bet if you look at her OnlyFans you won't find a single acutal b/g scene because she is not a porn star and of course married(okay Beth did some stuff but that was with her then boyfriend) and I doubt you will see her do it UNLESS she has a dramatic change of direction.

him shoving his fingers in and out her pussy and arsehole dont count as b/g then,cause they are doing that on perv cam on b/s