+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Thread: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=18626)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 07-06-2015 23:22
Tonight is yet another feeble effort by the looks of things.
Outfits with no relevance to the set.
Nudity for nudity's sake with little or no movement and change of pose.
Same old outfits, sets and positions.
No sexual stimulus whatsoever.
This is just hopeless. Utterly utterly hopeless.
How on earth the channels have the temerity to transmit this tripe just appalls me. It is a total disgrace.
They should be paying me £1.53 per minute for having to endure such monumentally monstrous output. There are no words negative enough in any dictionary of any language that could possibly do justice to the contempt I have for the shows right now. Reprehensible garbage yet again.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 07-06-2015 23:24
Your only option is not to watch
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 07-06-2015 23:26
The channels should be providing me with a better option!!
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 07-06-2015 23:27
(07-06-2015 23:26 )snookered147 Wrote: The channels should be providing me with a better option!!
They can but first they have to grow a set and we know they will not do that
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - eccles - 08-06-2015 00:31
(07-06-2015 13:21 )Censorship :-( Wrote: I'm afraid that Ofcon, censorial cunts though they are, are not to blame [snip - stuff]
Er, yes they are. As long as a handful of operators know they just need to pick up the phone when a new competitors turns up, and Ofcom will do their dirty work, there wont be competition or incentive to push the boundaries. If ordinary channels worked the same way we would only have BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky, soaps would be limited to 3 episodes a week, sport would only be broadcast at the weekend, Jeremy Kyle and the Loose Women would be out of work, only pantomime gays would be allowed, and villains in cop shows would never say anything ruder than "chufffin".
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 08-06-2015 01:10
Has anyone ever considered posting a Tonight I'm Hating Thread as they're plenty of names as I could easily dump on that list beginning with.............
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 08-06-2015 01:13
I'd add the producers to this list! They seem to be absent during much of the sessions tonight on BS and especially Studio 66. Why aren't they filming the women?
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 08-06-2015 11:47
(08-06-2015 01:13 )mrmann Wrote: I'd add the producers to this list! They seem to be absent during much of the sessions tonight on BS and especially Studio 66. Why aren't they filming the women?
the dicks on 66 where spending there time fucking around rather than doing there job, when Tamara was on they keeped cutting to a different camera that was filming them pulling silly faces and when they where showing Tamara where doing special to make it unwatchable, felt sorry for her as they where stopping her getting calls
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 08-06-2015 12:09
(08-06-2015 00:31 )eccles Wrote:(07-06-2015 13:21 )Censorship :-( Wrote: I'm afraid that Ofcon, censorial cunts though they are, are not to blame [snip - stuff]
Er, yes they are. As long as a handful of operators know they just need to pick up the phone when a new competitors turns up, and Ofcom will do their dirty work, there wont be competition or incentive to push the boundaries. If ordinary channels worked the same way we would only have BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Sky, soaps would be limited to 3 episodes a week, sport would only be broadcast at the weekend, Jeremy Kyle and the Loose Women would be out of work, only pantomime gays would be allowed, and villains in cop shows would never say anything ruder than "chufffin".
Please don't misrepresent what has been written, by snipping important information - What I actually wrote was:-
"I'm afraid that Ofcon, censorial cunts though they are, are not to blame; they are a convenient scapegoat - yes, they are fundamentally responsible for the serious decline over the years
, which has led to the near destruction of the babe channels, but more recently, it's the broadcasters and some (many? most?) babes to blame, as far as I can see."When did Ofcon's code change in such a way that could excuse the broadcaster's from blame, not just for the decline over the last couple of years, but the further tame down of 2015?
Plus, as I also pointed out:-
"The broadcasters will not challenge Ofcon's censorship, they have meekly capitulated at every turn..."
They don't have to put up with the broadcast censor, but have chosen to do so, and as a result, the shows have suffered massive decline for years.
RE: Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 08-06-2015 12:21
(07-06-2015 23:24 )Broncobilly Wrote: Your only option is not to watch
That’s the option I chose, sadly.
Nothing of even slight interest during the obligatory 'flick round', and that was it for me.
I'm now at the stage that I'm beginning to wonder if it is even worth expending this modest amount of effort? TBH, if it weren’t for the possibility of schedule changes/errors, I think I would only check on nights where a favourite babe is scheduled to be on, and there aren't many favourites left these days; and from what I've seen, few, if any newbies worth bothering with (whether that's their 'fault', or the broadcasters, is open to argument).
With very few exceptions, this truly seems to have become the era of 'dayshows at night'!