+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Sin TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=347)
+---- Thread: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=63996)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ILoveBrunettes - 25-06-2015 20:54
(25-06-2015 19:48 )terence Wrote: maybe the pole's purely cosmetic.
That is a thought i had as well... just fitted to the floor, not secure enough to actually use
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 25-06-2015 21:11
(25-06-2015 19:48 )terence Wrote: maybe the pole's purely cosmetic.
But it would be great if it was a secure pole that the girls could use but with 3 girls in the night club on screen at the same time there is not enough room for them to move about
Poor planning by Sin Tv
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 25-06-2015 21:18
(25-06-2015 20:19 )ShandyHand Wrote: ^ Makes líttle difference really. Which of the nameless strangers shall we blame for the farcical elements!
Only practicable distinction is that I think the addition of one or two key personnel could turn Sin around. Whereas if you see Sin's problems as more widespread it could take a whole new staff!
Naturally the people paying for it have a say but I think in general the production team decide what goes on each night as they are the ones in the studio. But without someone to confirm or deny this from the channel it's pure guess work.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ILoveBrunettes - 25-06-2015 21:38
(25-06-2015 21:11 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:(25-06-2015 19:48 )terence Wrote: maybe the pole's purely cosmetic.
But it would be great if it was a secure pole that the girls could use but with 3 girls in the night club on screen at the same time there is not enough room for them to move about
Poor planning by Sin Tv
In my opinion, the three girls on screen don't do it for me, not one bit. There is too much going on. Bluebird TV used to do that (in fact, i remember them having up to 5 girls on screen at once and it was awful). SinTV now do it and it is just a distraction. What if you are on a call to one of the girls, your watching, and the camera zooms to another girl? Hell, that would piss me right off. All SinTV need to do is add some more streams to their site, and offer up 2-4-1's from time to time, and also have some fun. Each time i watched the three girls on screen when i was watching Ree Petra, the camera operator really did not know where to go with the camera. I know it's popular with many the three on one screen, but for me, i hate it. I would rather flick from stream to stream than three girls on the same screen. The club set is the only one they can accomodate that type of play really, and it's just not used to it's potential at all. Strip away part of that set (where they sit down a lot) and build a stage/platform, make that pole secure, have 2-4-1's on there, have the girls use bluetooth headsets and just let them loose to have fun. I know a lot of people will disagree with me on this, but that's just my thoughts on this
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 25-06-2015 22:18
Boo! Ella's caller just told her the mic has been switched on for the last 15 minutes. "Thankyou slave" she said. Good while it lasted.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 25-06-2015 22:22
(25-06-2015 21:38 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote:(25-06-2015 21:11 )TURNIPHEAD Wrote:(25-06-2015 19:48 )terence Wrote: maybe the pole's purely cosmetic.
But it would be great if it was a secure pole that the girls could use but with 3 girls in the night club on screen at the same time there is not enough room for them to move about
Poor planning by Sin Tv
In my opinion, the three girls on screen don't do it for me, not one bit. There is too much going on. Bluebird TV used to do that (in fact, i remember them having up to 5 girls on screen at once and it was awful). SinTV now do it and it is just a distraction. What if you are on a call to one of the girls, your watching, and the camera zooms to another girl? Hell, that would piss me right off. All SinTV need to do is add some more streams to their site, and offer up 2-4-1's from time to time, and also have some fun. Each time i watched the three girls on screen when i was watching Ree Petra, the camera operator really did not know where to go with the camera. I know it's popular with many the three on one screen, but for me, i hate it. I would rather flick from stream to stream than three girls on the same screen. The club set is the only one they can accomodate that type of play really, and it's just not used to it's potential at all. Strip away part of that set (where they sit down a lot) and build a stage/platform, make that pole secure, have 2-4-1's on there, have the girls use bluetooth headsets and just let them loose to have fun. I know a lot of people will disagree with me on this, but that's just my thoughts on this
Fun on a babe show I have a distant memory of this
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ILoveBrunettes - 25-06-2015 22:26
^Oh there are some out there who can give this on screen... but it's becoming a dying art with the 'established few' who are seemingly getting lazier and not working for those calls. Damn, i did NOT want to say that, but it's something i'm seeing a lot of, and i mean a LOT of on all the channels
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - broncobilly10 - 25-06-2015 22:30
(25-06-2015 22:26 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote: ^Oh there are some out there who can give this on screen... but it's becoming a dying art with the 'established few' who are seemingly getting lazier and not working for those calls. Damn, i did NOT want to say that, but it's something i'm seeing a lot of, and i mean a LOT of on all the channels
Yes we can still rely on a small number of girls to bring it.
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - TURNIPHEAD - 25-06-2015 23:02
So much for 4 girls on SIN TV tonight
It is now midnight and there are only 2 girls and the web x-stream has been off air all night
Total shambles
RE: Sin TV - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 25-06-2015 23:07
(25-06-2015 21:38 )ILoveBrunettes Wrote: ...What if you are on a call to one of the girls, your watching, and the camera zooms to another girl? Hell, that would piss me right off.... Each time i watched the three girls on screen when i was watching Ree Petra, the camera operator really did not know where to go with the camera. I know it's popular with many the three on one screen, but for me, i hate it...
Good post but I have to pull you up on 3-in-1s being "popular"?! Really? With whom? I've not seen them anything but slated on here really. I can't imagine anyone (casual viewer or fan) who's not a channel operator finding any reason to favour them really! Tolerate, yes, I can see that; if you thought 'your' girl (of the night or favourite) might not be on screen otherwise or something. But is that popular?
Anyhow, sorry to quibble but they are a little bugbear of mine too...
The current multi girl sessions are (IMO rightly) derided - mostly for the exact reason you enumerate. They don't allow the caller/viewer to focus on the object of their affection. No-one can really fantasise about three babes consecutively in this format! (At least not unless they are writhing in an orgasmic mass! :-D Hardly likely under the current rules.) A guy's focus is always going to favour one girl and be disappointed by the inevitable distractions from that focus as you say.
(The pole has been used by Sin girls in the past btw. It is practical. At least, it was.)